this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
173 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26172 readers
4774 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that the federal government owes him “a lot of money” for prior Justice Department investigations into his actions and insisted he would have the ultimate say on any payout because any decision will “have to go across my desk.”

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 103 points 4 days ago

He's saying clearly, he can cut a check to himself. With taxpayer money. It's all kosher. Right?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Remember the morons applauding his good character, his generosity, and his incorruptibility when he said he wouldn't take the Presidential salary because he wasn't doing this for money. Just to be clear, that salary is 400k/yr. $230 million is 575 years worth of Presidential salary. Even if the presidential salary had always been 400k since George Washington's first term, Trump would be taking more than twice the money ever paid out to all presidents combined with this one payment. For the offense of... being investigated. For justified suspicion of, and even verified in some cases, crimes and corruption. Jesus H Fucking Christ.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Weirdly enough, that "privately funded" ballroom they're building is almost $230m. You know, the one Trump said he'd build and pay for himself?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can we piss in his new ballroom when it's finished?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

You can, but you won’t be the first.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seems like something a judge would decide, not the president. It’s blatant corruption that they’re even considering it anyway.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And more generally, that the beneficiary decides their own benefits. I mean this is the mother of all conflicts of interest.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention, he’s not owed shit. He was prosecuted for a reason and the only reason it failed was corrupt judges and a weak justice system. He’s guilty and should be in prison right now, not president.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah I agree with you 100% there.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 42 points 4 days ago

You would have thought that deciding the amount of taxpayer money to spend on yourself is the essence of corruption but then the man is the definition of corruption.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

The weird thing about this story is that after finding Crypto, it seems Trump is not hurting for money anymore. Not only is he sitting on a pile of shitty tokens, but the smart contracts governing those tokens constantly funnel money his way. Recent disclosures indicate that he and his family own $5 billion just in WLFI, and that doesn't count other crypto scams like the NFTs and such.

So, by all accounts, he doesn't really need this money anymore. Still, he will push to take as much as possible, just out of spite. Whether or not he actually broke any laws doesn't factor into his thinking. He is out for revenge, pure and simple. And Republicans in Congress will let him grab them by the pussy, because they want a piece of it.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Remember when MAGA insisted he wasn't taking his salary because he was already rich.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I still see his idiots using that dumb talking point even after watching 10 years of escalating self-dealing schemes like crypto and various other grifts.

Rubes like that are exactly the kind of marks that a con man like Taco can spot and butter up for maximum self-gain. He's just doing it at a national level.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

"You are all going to pay me a lot but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make"

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is preposterous. Have we used that adjective yet?

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

#NOKINGS

#KILLALLHITLERS

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think this should be deferred until after he's out of office.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Or at least until after he's dead

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Good thing they fired that ethics overseer

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The kid has the keys to the cookie jar. This couldn't possible go wrong.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -1 points 4 days ago

But Biden/Obama did it.