this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
422 points (99.8% liked)

News

32914 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed https://archive.is/cvouF

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 162 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Nobel Peace Prize material right there, folks.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 30 points 3 days ago

I hear you WTF

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 15 points 3 days ago

Totally sane approach to winning it as well

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

He's going to build a desolation and call it a peace.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

When asked by a reporter why he would not ask Congress for a declaration of war, he replied: "I think we're just gonna kill people. Okay? We're gonna kill them. They're gonna be, like, dead."

He added: “The land is going to be next. And we may go to the Senate; we may go to the Congress and tell them about it, but I can’t imagine they’d have any problem with it."

Fuck I hate this guy so much. Can't even call a Nazi tyrant war criminal a Nazi tyrant war criminal.

BTW I don't agree with Candace Owens on anything else, but I don't think her claims that Trump may have been involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination (or at least allowed it to happen) are exactly "unhinged," when he's comfortable openly saying this kind of shit to the fucking press. If he can talk openly about just murdering people on a whim, if he can release an official memo that very much implies he plans to do the same for any American citizen who disagrees with him, why would it be "unhinged," to think he's capable of something like that?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He wouldn't be able to keep his mouth shut, if there is a conspiracy it's coming from the puppeteers; Stephen Miller, Roger Stone, Susie Wiles, etc.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's always seems so weird to me that the night Charlie Kirk was murdered, he called him a "martyr for free speech." Then he started cracking down on free speech and framing it as terrorist activity.

Then he literally bragged "we took away the freedom of speech."

I think if there was some kind of conspiracy to allow it to happen, then everybody in his administration is aware of it. Hours before he was murdered, the Senate finance committee asked Scott Bessant why he wouldn't release the bank records for several banks including JP Morgan, regarding Epstein and people like Peter Thiel.

Then Republicans in both the House and Senate blocked an attempt by Democrats to subpoena those records, but nobody even noticed bc everybody was paying attention to the assassination.

So many wealthy and powerful people were desperately in need of a big distraction that day. Not only did it work to distract, it allowed them a BS reason to claim they had to crack down on the left and any opposition.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 149 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Imagine if Obama said "We're just going to kill people" in any context. I hate this shit so much.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 48 points 3 days ago (17 children)

To be fair...Obama did "just kill people" by the thousands.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 39 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Liberals like Obama because he did it while keeping a low profile so they could keep their conscious clean.

MAGA like Trump cuz he gloats about it so they can revel in it.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Sludge@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Dawg is he actively trying to launch into an actual emergency or war to try to hold on to power? Looks like it.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 days ago

Yeah. He tried to get into a war with Iran in term 1. He "predicted/projected" Obama would start a war to increase his polling to get reelected. So we know he thinks this way

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago

All of the above.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He'll declare war before the midterms and claim that there can't be elections while the US is at war.

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

shame we held open and fair elections during every war we've had in the past, including civil war

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, from Ukraine, though an actual war is occurring. Russia are more than happy to hold elections since they're rigged anyway.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ukraine has a different constitution than us, with provisions for suspending elections during war. We do not have any such provisions in our constitution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 104 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com 57 points 3 days ago

Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence or the threat of violence against people or property to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, often to further political or social objectives. It can be categorized as international, involving foreign groups, or domestic, driven by domestic social or political issues.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dictators don't even say that shit out loud.

He's not smart. Even for a dictator. And the bar's pretty fucking low there.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Can we please do the right thing here and convict this man of war crimes. Even if he's already dead when allegedly sane people get back in power, they need to sue the shit out of his remaining trusts and kids for corruption, bribery etc.

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 80 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This guy is so dumb, man.

As if "we'll just kill people" isn't just a declaration of war. 🙄

[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 32 points 3 days ago

The US hasn’t technically been at war since WW2 by US definition technicalities, a system that many Americans seem to enjoy stating when talking about the millions of people killed by the US military and allies since in various invasions and occupations

[–] vivi@slrpnk.net 22 points 3 days ago

it's like the opposite of "i declare bankruptcy!"

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago

A war is a two-way conflict. No way they want that.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

”He loved to watch people burn, the way their skin blackened and blistered and melted off their bones. He burned lords he didn't like, he burned Hands who disobeyed him. He burned anyone who was against him. Before long, half the country was against him. Aerys saw traitors everywhere.”

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shit is that the Mad King?

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago

That's Stephen Miller's inner monologue

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 31 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Declaring war is a boring, formal process that acknowledges authority other than himself, of course he doesn't want to do it. Why do all of that when he already has the thrill of ordering the deaths of random civilians and having the footage streamed live to him while he scarfs down a McDouble? If he wants to send in a Marine division he'll just say go do it, who's going to stop him?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 22 points 3 days ago

"Just" 🤦🤦🤦

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

in order to distract from the files, he would have to declare war like Nixon did.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

renames Department of Defense back to Department of War

declines to actually declare war

What is even the point, then? Ignoring the whole "only Congress can declare war" part, of course, but it's not like that's going to be a particular difficult hurdle for the regime.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago

The point of pretending to change the name of the department was so Petey could pretend to be a big tough warrior in front of all the army guys.

It's theatrics and make-believe, because Republicans live in a fantasy of their own imagination

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

you know, in comparison dubya at least tried to have this kind of diplomatic subtlety that is nowhere to be found in current administration

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Cheney/Dubya laid a lot of the groundwork for the fascist wave currently swamping the USA

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›