this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

News

36491 readers
2535 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Food banks have already been contending with higher food prices and increased need. Administrators say demand will skyrocket if federal nutrition benefits stop in a few days because of the government shutdown.

"The average household that we see receives about $350 per month, which roughly translates to about $44 million worth of SNAP benefits that will be gone from families," she told NPR. "There is no way that we alone can make up for a $44 million food budget shortfall."

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

its brutal out there, CP24 Put out a thing saying something like 1 in 5 food bank users have jobs which is wild. isn't that the whole point of the social contract? We provide productivity and in return the employer provides payment for you to live? what happens when thats not enough...

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 4 months ago

I think we've found out what happens. It's happening now, and not for the first time.

Most species, we now believe, exist for a few millions of years. We might not even be a million years old, and for most of that we've been a constant companion to disaster. An unsympathetic observer might even see it as a defining trait.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Wife and I saw the SNAP suspension coming and dug around in our budget to give what we could split between local and state food banks. Feels like barely anything compared to what's needed.

How can we not agree on "no hungry children or seniors"? If not just "no hunger". I guarantee we're net losing money by not feeding our people. How is it that the cruelty is really the point? I can't wrap my head around it

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I remember when Faux was spending untold hours of air time concerning itself over people eating steak and lobster on SNAP benefits. I know lots of Karens constantly concern themselves with how people on SNAP might buy....SODA! Republicans work to pass legislation to exclude certain foods from SNAP use. I am quite sure a lot of total asshats think those on SNAP benefits should just be subsisting on something like stale bread and water.

I mean, with attitudes out there on prominent display, the ghoulishness is there for all to see...for some reason, there is no big movement to police what the idle rich/parasitic class eat, though.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 6 points 4 months ago

...look for the helpers...Fred Rogers is spinning in his grave...