I actually enjoy my work, most of the time, sue me.
I guess getting an education in what you like and are good at while it's in demand by the market is kinda lucky though.
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
I actually enjoy my work, most of the time, sue me.
I guess getting an education in what you like and are good at while it's in demand by the market is kinda lucky though.
Yeah, this exactly. I actually really love my job, most of the time, and it pays pretty well, with a strong union and an excellent work/life balance. But I look out at the market, and it doesn't take a genius to realize, boy was that a miracle. I'm not so blinded by my own anecdotal evidence to not realize things drastically need reform, and that everyone deserves a job as fulfilling as mine.
This person is just describing the psychological factors underpinning self-determination theory as it applies to work but without the language to convey it: https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2017_DeciOlafsenRyan_annurev-orgpsych.pdf
Ain't it funny how that can happen? How someone can "stumble across" some academic theory or whatnot without knowing it. This isn't at all to say academia isn't necessary, this is just an observation.
Academia is just very strict standards of thinking and talking about thinking. This makes it difficult but reliable.
Oh, I personally love to see it. It's how we bridge the gap of academia and the real world. There are many things that people feel or experience but don't have the language to discuss, but once they do it can be very empowering. If you're familiar with urban planning discours online then you've maybe heard of the word "stroad" describing the horrible 6 lane + type roads in much of the US filled with stripmalls. Being on one you can get this feeling of alienation and artificiality, like something isn't right. However once you have a name for it, you can now discuss and advocate to change the "stroad".
Depends on what we call work. Food in nature is free in the economic sense, but spending time and effort gathering it can be considered work as well, and maybe isn't as joyful as we can expect, especially when doing it for the 3427th time, and when it hasn't regrown since last time we collected, so we need to go further of find alternate sources.
I like to put a clear distinction on what is work in the broader sense, and what is capitalist work. We don't need capitalist work to live, and we would be better without it, but some form of daily struggle to maintain ourselves, we will probably always have, unfortunately.
Getting rid of capitalist work would be great. We can mostly leave things as they are, except git rid corporate ownership of anything, and corporate personhood.
You sign a contract with a real, living person. If you must sign with a company, you sign a contract that binds every officer of that company personally. If a company does something illegal, well, it didn't. A person in that company did something illegal and the highest ranking person on that contract needs to take personal responsibility for it and go to prison for murder, tax evasion, or whatnot.
Also regulate the stock market until it's almost completely gone. It's not a good place for retirement accounts, and that's the only good thing that the stock market has going for it.
Then add in a few fix actions in general, like limit home and land ownership to what a person actually uses. No squatting on homes to rent them out.
Also full medical and dental for everyone, no private ownership of either practice. As a doctor, dentist, or nurse, you are suddenly a government employee, with government certification and training programs that are open to anyone who applies. Most people wouldn't make it through the program (and background check) but anyone could try.
Add in some more social safety nets, and life could be good.
That's why he distinguished work from effort though. But I think the concept we're looking for here is called alienation.
Food production is at an all time high and yet food prices and food waste is insane. It is 100% price gouging. They would rather waste massive amounts of food and ruin topsoil and insist on shrinkflation instead of sacrificing a few dollars.
Transportation cost.
I live in a city that makes a specific brand of granola bars. If I go buy a box off the shelf at the store, that box has traveled a minimum of 400km before I touch it (ignoring converters and whatnot in the production facility.)
Centralization has really fucked up the cost of things.
I can’t remember when or where I read this so please take it with a grain of salt; but most food shortages are caused by market speculation
Islam forbids this kind of profiteering off food and stuff. I am an atheist, but the fact that stuff like this is mentioned in very old religions is telling for how far back this bullshit goes.
People for the last twelve thousand years: "Hunting and gathering cannot support the needs of a growing population. We should create a system where crops can be grown efficiently and in high quantities, and animals can be bred and raised. It will be labour-intensive and require specialized knowledge, skills, and equipment, it will lead to the economic stratification of society, but it's the best way to not have most of our people starve to death."
One guy who recently read the Communist Manifesto (abridged version): "But food is literally free!"
I mean, yes, food is not literally free. But there are certainly ways to organize an agricultural society that don’t automatically lead to social hierarchies, and that would be vastly preferable, imo. The enclosure of the commons has been a disaster
I think a big reason why work feels bad is because in many jobs the surplus value of your labor is being stolen by the executives. When you put in effort to personal projects that feels good because you are actually getting to reap the rewards of your labor.
People like doing stuff that's useful, not just for ourselves but for others as well. What we don't like is being exploited.
Yeah the myth that people don't want to work is crazy to me. How do all these insane open source projects exist then? Why did I spend extra effort to contribute to a project when I already got it working for myself? Most people just inherently like working on things they think will help other people.
Housing is basically free as well. Have you seen caves!?
Unfortunately we would have a cave housing crisis on our hands very soon. Although our numbers might dwindle in the bear wars.
We've extended our population far beyond what "remove the fences and weapons and let everyone scavenge" could support.
Personally I think people who didn't contribute to that problem should get to scavenge whatever they want, though.
food is literally free until someone builds a fence around it and guards it with weapons
This is the violence inherent in the system.
Yep. And not just our system - it's inherent to life itself. After all, other animals hoard food, too. If we just "let nature run its course" things will never change - we need to be proactive in building systems that work differently.
This person has never heard of the tragedy of the commons
and you have never heard of the book "governing the commons" by Elinor Ostrom, which is a book explaining in great detail and with the use of real examples how the tragedy of the commons can be avoided
Lol without agriculture you would literally end up eating shit and dying.
Not true. Other ways to cultivate plentiful food that are not 'agriculture'; adjacent practices
No there aren't. Not at the scale that humanity currently exists. We would literally die even if we just couldn't make fertilizer. There would be no way to produce enough food for this many people.
Your mom isn't at the scale humanity currently exists!

Real, this is a delusional slop post. All food requires some degree of labour, maintaining food supply or access to food requires even more labour.
Civilisation ≠ the natural human ecosystem, it's something we created... To feed ourselves.
First, the fact that labor is external to the worker, i.e., it does not belong to his intrinsic nature; that in his work, therefore, he does not affirm himself but denies himself, does not feel content but unhappy, does not develop freely his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind. The worker therefore only feels himself outside his work, and in his work feels outside himself. He feels at home when he is not working, and when he is working he does not feel at home. His labor is therefore not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labor. It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need; it is merely a means to satisfy needs external to it. Its alien character emerges clearly in the fact that as soon as no physical or other compulsion exists, labor is shunned like the plague. External labor, labor in which man alienates himself, is a labor of self-sacrifice, of mortification. Lastly, the external character of labor for the worker appears in the fact that it is not his own, but someone else’s, that it does not belong to him, that in it he belongs, not to himself, but to another. Just as in religion the spontaneous activity of the human imagination, of the human brain and the human heart, operates on the individual independently of him – that is, operates as an alien, divine or diabolical activity – so is the worker’s activity not his spontaneous activity. It belongs to another; it is the loss of his self.
-- Marx