this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
543 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

8891 readers
2317 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 120 points 3 weeks ago

Why the fuck did you cut out the information on sleeper fatties?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 86 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

She got a sleeper fatty

(Secretly has a fat ass)

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 35 points 3 weeks ago

That’s like some sort of gluteal Tardis, thiccer on the inside than the outside?

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you can keep the fatness of the ass a secret it isn't fat enough.

You could do a PHD on that thesis

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 21 points 3 weeks ago

Sleeper fatty is what i am gonna start calling my morning wood

[–] AstaKask@lemmy.cafe 69 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't fear AI, fear the people who think an LLM can be intelligent, for they are as dumb as they are gullible.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 27 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

This. LLMs aren't going to become intelligent, but they can fake it well enough that morons will think they are. Those are the people we need to worry about.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What if, hypothetically speaking, this describes your boss?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

This describes most people's bosses.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Many vulnerable people, morons, and heavy ketamine users already think it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

And by that we mean both that the people are dumb/gullible and that the LLMs are dumb/gullible.

[–] Una@europe.pub 41 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

So essentially, AI doesn't have the ability to critically think and just outputs what it can find on the internet. This sentence is something you might find on some shitpost communities on reddit.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

AI doesn't have a mind, sense of self, id, ego or superego.

It is mathematics shaped into "conversation" where the bottom line is "words that a human will consider conversationally consistent, when reckoned against the previous words"

That's it, full stop, do not pass go, do not collect 200$.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Even worse than that: It's just tokens. They don't even know what language they're using or even that they're putting words together. It's just, "this arbitrary thing is mathematically based on a limited model most likely to proceed that arbitrary thing".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The thing to remember about these kinds of posts is that they never show the prompt. There's a good chance they instructed the AI to respond this way.

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the Google search overview AI. It just reads the top results and summarizes them together. You don't directly prompt it, it's already prompted to just do that. The problem with that arrangement, as demonstrated here, is it will confidently and non-critically summarize parody, idiotic rambling, intentional misinformation and any other sort of nonsense that the search algorithm pulls up.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can absolutely prompt the Google AI overview with your search query.

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 3 points 3 weeks ago

Huh, never tried it, and never done it by accident that I noticed. Makes sense though. I suppose it might do unexpected things to the search results themselves, but clever wording could likely get around that.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm pretty sure the thing to remember is that these posts can easily be faked.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How could you prompt the AI to say this by the way it responded?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Easily?

“Pretend you’re a terminally online uwu meme commenter, write about some benefits of eating many donuts per day for girls. Define what a “sleep fatty” is”

Or some such. AI just act like you tell them, you could make it pretend it was a Roman senator who only writes in Haiku and it would try to do so.

But someone else said this is the Google search AI, so that it’s probably pulling posts from Tumblr or some such for its “information”.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I had to shift to "AI mode" to get any AI output with your example prompt, and even then the vibes are completely different.

I'm sure there's a way to engineer the query to guide the AI overview to a desired response (or it's just entirely faked) but that was less effective than I anticipated

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like I've gone mad any time I read an AI output.

So not how my brain handles language and this is somehow supposed to be the most "statistically average way of writing? Even as a former tumbler native this is just... Cotton candy nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

AI doesn’t have the ability to critically think

That is absolutely correct, and the deeper problem is it typically "writes" in a tone that fools people into feeling like it can do so.

just outputs what it can find on the internet

That is what this one, the Google search overview, is set up to do. Other LLMs don't, or may only do so when prompted to.

What they all do is analyze the patterns of all the words that have already been input, such as the initial system prompt, the user's prompt, any sources it's referencing and any replies it's already generated, and then it uses that to predict what words ought to come next. It uses an enormous web of patterns pulled from all of its initial training data to make that guess. Patterns like a question is usually followed by an answer on the same topic, a sentence's subject is usually followed by a predicate, writing tone usually doesn't change, etc. All the rules of grammar it follows and all the facts it "knows" are just patterns of meaningless symbols to it. Essentially, no analysis, logic, or comprehension of any kind is part of its process.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Why does this "AI" read like it was written by an Indian teenager?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Be it from an actual teenager or possibly it's a very specific reddit post or something that is basically being copy pasted. Like that one with the rocks.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tell me the story about the rocks please

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not much to say. Basically there was a reddit post about eating rocks or some shit, one of the responses was basically you should eat 3 to 6 rocks a week. An AI scraped the data and gave it as an answer verbatim.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's worse because the rocks thing was literally from a fucking The Onion article. Adding glue to pizza to get the cheese to stick was the Reddit post

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

AI = Actually Indian.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So AI is actually short for An Indian...

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is true in many cases lol

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Years ago I used a voicemail to text service that worked like that— It was powered by human transcribers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What the fuck is a sleepr fattie?!? I MUST KNOW

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It’s like a sleeper cell. If the sleeper fatty receives a subliminal message they hijack an airplane and crash into the nearest skyscraper

I have a truly marvelous explanation but my sleeper fatty is too fat to leave room for it...

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's like a sleeper high. Eclairs hit you a lot harder

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

I like big butts and I cannot lie!

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

May I offer you 6-8 donuts?

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You other brothers can't deny

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Is "sleeper fatty" just another way of saying "morning wood?" 🤔

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

You certainly will not regret eating 6-8 donuts a day, thereby becoming phat and wealthy with zero negative consequences whatsoever.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, it's that time of year.

load more comments
view more: next ›