this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
492 points (95.1% liked)

science

14350 readers
235 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In trials

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MajesticSloth@lemmy.world 151 points 9 months ago (5 children)

When this was posted before someone who followed it fairly closely and others like it, updated the thread with info because the article was behind current info. They had already stopped the trials for MS because it wasn't working. So they began to just focus on one other, the Crohn's, I believe. Figuring if they got one to work, they could go back to the others and get them on the right track.

I have MS, and while this is a new approach, there have been so many articles about treatments that end up going nowhere after the first excitement. So it is still very early to get hopes up.

Hope can be a dangerous thing. Hope can drive a man insane, as Red said.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

T1 diabetes here. A cure is just 5 years away...

They told me, when I was diagnosed in 1992.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 17 points 9 months ago

It always 5 years if properly funded. It's never properly funded so always 5 years.

They are testing an artificial pancreas currently. The cost is the issue as always.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Commercially viable fusion is always 20 yrs away so keep your chin up

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Well damn, I got MS too but caught it fairly early. I'm hoping for a major breakthrough before it gets really bad.

[–] Lycerius@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I came for the Orange reference, but was not disappointed by Red.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 months ago

So, if I understand this right, a more accurate title would be "Research into vaccines against autoimmune diseases continues, new data indicate that a change of focus might be needed"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Website I've never heard of: check

Wild claims that seem too good to be true: check

Little to no proof about said claims: check

Don't get me wrong, this would be fantastic if it's true. But I'm sceptical. It feels like all those articles about a cure for cancer that then never go anywhere.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Here's the article that should have been posted, except of course that it's a few months old and nothing new has been reported on it yet that I know of. https://pme.uchicago.edu/news/inverse-vaccine-shows-potential-treat-multiple-sclerosis-and-other-autoimmune-diseases

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This sounds quite exciting and it doesn't smell like bullshit.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably extremely affordable at 3 million a pop for 5 shots.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Easy hack. Get a bunch of more affordable health care services during the year until you reach your out-of-pocket max, then go in and get your 3 million worth of shots all on the insurance company's dime with zero extra cost to you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Article from September. First I'm hearing of it...

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Every science article is just a comment section disapproving the article. That's why I stay away from these science communities, it's all clickbait and lies

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At the same time, commenters don't necessarily know what the fuck they're talking about either.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah Reddit always had that problem, I think it's here too - top rated comment is someone saying it won't work and the article is wrong, everyone just accepts it without question.

I still see people using battery breakthrough stories as an example of stuff that never comes too market despite most of them being in the very phone the person is using.

I genuinely think a lot of them are just people who hate science and engineering so don't want people to be interested in it

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I genuinely think a lot of them are just people who hate science and engineering so don't want people to be interested in it

So strange for those people to hang out in science communities in that case, to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Looks at that.... The one thing good about reddit was the /r/science sub, it was always full of moderator deleted comments that were off topic, factually incorrect, etc. posted articles actually were scientific reports and not clickbait crap lik this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

What's bad is that it's a good article. It covers things very well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 26 points 9 months ago (7 children)

If we assume for a moment that it works as advertised - what is it that makes this a vaccine? To me it sounds like a cure or treatment.

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The creators call it an inverse vaccine. A vaccine causes the immune system to recognize a compound to attack. This treatment causes the immune system to ignore a compound it had previously recognized. So they are specifically saying it's not a vaccine (and OP is misrepresenting them), even though that word is in the phrase, something roughly like antivenom is not a venom.

Thanks for the additional clarification!

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is not a cure for the reasons others in this thread have stated. It doesn't repair damage already done, it only prevents the disease from advancing. That's still a huge deal, though.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But when it comes to type 1 diabetes the cause is the body destroying beta cells in the pancreas and everything else is a symptom of that. If you can make the body "forget" killing beta cells (like the article states the anti-vaccine would, or rather teach the body to not kill) then it would make sense for the body to recover and repair the damage done.

Wouldn't it then be a cure?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] luna@lemmy.catgirl.biz 22 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Oh fuck yes! I hope this works so badly (living the nightmare with crohns)

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same here friend. The disease is rough and hits everyone differently. Hope you’re doing alright with things tho :)

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would give anything to be rid of this disease. I haven't slept a full night since 1996. And the pain... And it always seems like nobody understands. 'Oh him? He just poops a lot, ignore the doom and gloom.'

[–] NMBA@mstdn.ca 5 points 9 months ago
[–] Dhs92@programming.dev 5 points 9 months ago

I wonder if it also applies to ulcerative colitis...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Only "ten more years to cure diabetes"

-Science 30 years ago

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

This still wont cure diabetes, but it will prevent it from developing or advancing if you catch it early enough.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Downcount@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

In my understanding this could reverse the autoimmune reaction to Type 1 Diabetes not regrow the already killed β-cells.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Call me when the human trials give a positive return

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Patience Padawan.

I have 1 autistic kid with T1D and 1 kid with celiac. I'm confident in next 10 years both will be cured.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing you mean the diabetes and celiac will be cured, not the autism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chaosppe@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Awesome, I have an autoimmune desease that can possibly paralyse me in future. I hope progress can continue 🙏

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if a similar technique could be used to reduce organ transplant rejection.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Ehhh, maybe? If I'm reading the article right (and I haven't yet gone digging past the article to the source itself because that takes more time than I currently have), it's targeting t cells only. Rejection involves more than just t cells though.

It might be at least partially effective, I'm not trained in the field to be able to predict that much, just basing what I'm saying off of past reading and general information.

I'm not confident in this, though. It's pretty damn far beyond the level of actual training I've had. I can say confidently that the basic techniques they're talking about should be applicable to more than just autoimmune disorders, just not the degree of efficacy.

There's just so many more cells involved in something like hyperacute and acute rejection that it's likely to be something that would have to be more complicated than the already complicated technique they're working on.

I would say that, if this proves to work in actual humans safely and effectively, that the immune related cancers would be the more probable beneficiaries of the method.

See, most of the autoimmune stuff is a "false positive" the body at some point got fooled by some kind of external agent, that happened to match some part of the body. So, if you wipe out the "memory" of that false positive, the body stops attacking itself.

The cancers that are immune related should respond in a similar way. You'd still have the malignant cells, but it should stop new ones from going crazy, and the usual methods of killing off the existing malignant cells should effectively "cure" the person with drastically reduced chances of relapse.

But with transplants, there's no false positive. There actually are foreign cells in the body, being constantly exposed to immune cells. There's also usually more than one kind of cell, so the method they're using probably would need multiple efforts to work at all, and would likely need to be administered regularly. I'm fairly confident that the method could reduce severity of rejection, but that's still only fairly lol. But, (disclaimer again), the method should work in either a single or small number of treatments for autoimmune diseases.

I hope like hell this gets into human trials fast. I have a personal stake in it (hence all the reading lol) and what this thing can't do is undo the damage already done. The person being treated is still going to have whatever degree of disability the disease already caused, so the sooner people can start the treatment, the better off they are.

Most of the diseases explicitly listed as targets for this treatment are fucking brutal. Just one year with MS, as an example, can take someone from healthy and active to being half blind, or unable to walk unaided, or any number of other issues. MS already takes time to diagnose, so pretty much everyone that has it has some degree of disability by the time they start existing treatments. And the existing treatments, as incredible as they are, don't fully prevent new damage occurring. Nor do all of them work at full efficacy for everyone. You can end up having to try multiple treatments to find the right one for your immune system.

So, most MS patients have a serious amount of time before their disease even gets slowed. My wife, from diagnosis to first partially effective treatment, went almost a year, and lost so damn much from that time plus the effects from before diagnosis. You're talking someone that was modeling and a jogger being unable to walk down a hallway until over a year of physical therapy, and still can't handle long walks.

And she didn't even lose as much as some people do. She also deals with what's called relapsing/remitting MS (RRMS) which takes breaks between attacks. People with primary progressive MS (PPMS) can lose function faster and more severely. It's a fucking terrifying disease.

This is starting to go very long and tangential, so I'll stop after this bit.

I hope like hell it will work for not only the listed diseases, but rejection too. Gods, the lives it could make better if it can do all of that would change the world, along with the individual lives. It would be the scientific equivalent of a miracle cure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What about Hashimoto's thyroiditis and Graves' disease?

[–] MisterChief@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I remember seeing something on reddit about this earlier this year iirc. Definitely exciting and I certainly hope there is credence to this. Would love to see auto immune disorders go by the wayside in the next couple decades. Once they fix all the real bad ones I hope they make one for vitiligo, I'm tired of 70 spf sunblock and weird looking tans.

[–] Bransons404@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Is this the "T1D cure in 10 years" I was promised 21 years ago?

[–] dunz@feddit.nu 5 points 9 months ago

This looks promising, way more promising than any other cure for MS I've read about

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Chuymatt@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That is a different kind of immune response. It is not autoimmune, it is hyper responsive.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but both are "the immune system attacking something it shouldn't", so I wonder if the same mechanism can desensitize it to allergens.
The article mentioned trails for celiac which although it says is autoimmune, at least involves a foreign substance

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›