this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
446 points (97.0% liked)

196

5132 readers
1571 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes! A Ferrari, a prostitute (male or female) and a psychologist for every citizen. Also, wine on tap in every home.

You either get the joke or you don't.

i was promised a pony and a toothbrush

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago

It'll be a prime example of "the road to hell is paved with good intentions". Can't imagine I'd be able to keep the country running well for more than a year tbh

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'd actually be a great leader because I know literally the only secret to good leadership (not great, but good): appoint people that are really really good at their jobs so you can do fuck all all day.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (8 children)

But are YOU good at spotting talent? Or at the least do you know someone who is?

This crucial first step (and it is only a first step) runs right up against the Principle-agent problem, and a major result of our inability to recognize talent generally leads to a Market for lemons.

Dictatorships suffer immensely from these problems because the dictator is a national focal point for decisions. Every swindler and scammer in the country is running around trying to fool the dictator. Since the benefits of being on the dictator’s good side are sky-high and the costs of being on their bad side are severe, the incentives for honesty and transparency in communications are nonexistent. This is the source of dictatorship dysfunction.

About the only thing dictators tend to be good at (if they survive) is navigating a complex web of sycophantic and untrustworthy relationships. There is a constant need for surveillance and purging of potential traitors which has the effect of inspiring fear and paranoia throughout the regime. This in turn feeds into the dictator’s own paranoia, which becomes a vicious cycle.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Also no closed door meetings, no side hustles, no conflicts of interest. And regular audits just to be safe. If you want to work for the public your business is of public interest.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

People talk about Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot like they are monsters, but the truth is, they were just regular humans, they had feelings, mothers, ambitions, anxieties. They were just normal men. To call them monsters ignores the full range of human capabilities.

Now if if you want a truly monstrous dictator, and not one of these posers, vote for me.

[–] BadJojo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Great. Please refer to me as the god emperor omnissiah from now on. It'll be fine. Trust.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 45 points 2 days ago

I was really skeptical until you said trust, now I know I can trust you.

[–] itsmistermoon@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Guys

What? You mean it? I promise I won't do anything weird haha. All of my laws will be super normal and not involve any of my kinks haha. Y'all are so sweet 🥺. I am very normal and can be trusted with state power

[–] UnGlasierteGurke@feddit.org 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look at those soulless, lifeless eyes.

Black eyes...

Like a dolls eyes...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course comrade! But why do we have to wear these shark costume- STEP COMRADE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

THE SHARK COSTUME STAYS ON OR I PUT YOU IN THE SOUP

A friend of mine literally said that he'll be a great leader and should not be questioned after throwing out all sorts of silly ideas on how to improve our city. I told him he'll be worse than the current government and this is why democracy is still the best, because it does not rely on a single point of failure: which is one leader making bad decisions after bad decisions. A good autocrat is only one in a million.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It will definitely be different yes

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 16 points 2 days ago

That was my thought as well. Probably not better, but yeah, different I can do.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

It'll be different

Still bad, but different XD

[–] kiara@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

🌸Flowers for everyone💐🌸

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

flower farmers wondering who tf will pay for the flowers in the background

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

You're perfect then. Congrats, you got the job

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Good leaders don't seek power.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No thanks. People don’t wield power, power wields people.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

This, you're not going to be successfully holding on to the position of dictator by directing available resources to what's best for the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"if the sum of your possessions exceeds 100 M dollars/euros/whatever, your shall lose your civil rights, including the right to have your -shady- death investigated."

You're welcome. Invest in schools and hospitals. You have one week.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely fucking not unless you also make me omniscient so I know the best course of action.

Otherwise my ass is making my mother in charge of education, tell her to find some people who can help us, and then try to let those people who are experts do shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i unironically feel like I would be a better leader than who's currently in charge. hell, a literal naked molerat would probably do a better job

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

first thing would be to roll out the Guillotine in front of anyone with a networth of more than 10 Million, and ask an Ultimatum: "Either your Money above 10 Million goes to the Community and Infrastructure or your Head." After it has been settled I would resign.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How much is a $25 million mansion worth if you can either die or give it away? Sounds like it's only worth $9 million

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

We need someone strong of character and values, experienced but able to change, willing but not eager to take up the mantle of leadership, someone who knows that their duty is not to build the future themselves, but to empower others to do so and bring together their successes in one coherent vision.
What I'm saying is: Linus Torvalds for world governor!

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

"Who's yuu? I'm Mii!"

So, we going to miniaturize every pony for every man, or not?

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I promise I'll be benevolent dictator

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

I’m down:

  • Single payer medical/dental/vision insurance
  • Implement UBI
  • Taxes based on a curve of net worth up to 100%
  • Universal ranked choice voting
  • Abolish my dictatorship

Might throw other things in there, but I think it’d be the shortest lived dictatorship in history.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Funko pops are now illegal

[–] goatbeard@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago

You have my vote oh my mighty leader

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] morto@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

FOSS on everyone. No large corporations. Almost everything produced locally. Cars only allowed in rural areas. Public transportation will be like this. No big cities, everyone will be spread into medium-sized ones. People will have houses, and every house will be obliged to have a tree in the front. People will only be allowed a max of two children, and we will have a degrowth economy where population itself will shrink slowly until the end of humanity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i dont trust myself enough .. to have such control over so many peeps.

right now i may think "mhm yes mayb i could do it" but mayb i change with power.

i wouldnt trust any individual peep with that...

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would trust myself, choose me

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›