this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
718 points (98.8% liked)

politics

27071 readers
2494 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Conservatives in comment sections everywhere: "pssh he's just kidding, god you libs are so sensitive!"

Pretty sure those cowardly fucks said if they kept their guns they would step in against tyranny.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

"It's nice that he always says the truth"

"He's only joking, he doesn't actually mean that"

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Pretty sure those cowardly fucks said if they kept their guns they would step in against tyranny.

It's not tyranny to them if they're in the Kool Klub.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Is that the Kool Klux Klub?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago

Do it let’s pop this shit off already

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 72 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's literally not capable of joking, so this is serious.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck does he have to do to be taken seriously? Invade a foreign country and take away their leader?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

It was just a prank, bro!

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

God forbid you disrupt the global economy.

[–] ikies@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for that big beautiful obituary

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Believe him when orange hitler talks

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Workers need to take control of the economy. No longer should capital be held in high regards in reference to OUR economic way of life. Workers must stop believing the circuses and take over the bread making.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 181 points 4 days ago (18 children)

What is this fucking headline. He is not in a position to float changes like this.

Trump plans on circumventing the law and becoming a ~~forever president~~ king.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 155 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Prove to me that he's not already a king. He suffers zero consequences and solely controls every aspect of the federal government. He is what a 6 year old thinks the president is.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Almost all of his "decrees" get overturned. Most of those decisions get somewhere followed. His people try to operate through loopholes in the laws rather than outright violating them. He wouldn't be tiptoing around vague legality this much if he were actually a king

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

Funny you should say that; he literally brags that he hasn't matured past age 6.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It’s how he normalizes his insane plans without being directly implicit. He starts with the “I’m not saying they should cancel the elections. But if they did… I’m not saying they should do it though. But I mean, it wouldn’t be unheard of.”

Anyone who has ever worked as a restaurant server knows the old “blame they, not yourself” trick. Forgot to bring out some table’s food, and now they’re upset that it’s taking so long? Don’t apologize for it and take the blame, because that will have them potentially tipping you less. Instead, say “Oh, did they not bring that out? Let me go take care of that real quick.” Now you’ve deflected blame off to some faceless entity, and have put yourself on the customer’s side as someone who wants to help. Your tip won’t be affected, because you’ve positioned yourself as helpful.

Notice that when Trump floats ideas like this, it’s almost always “they”, not “we”. “They” is a faceless, nebulous entity. It can be anybody or nobody, so placing blame on “they” is a convenient way to float potentially unpopular ideas without putting any individual (or himself) in the crosshairs. If he used “we”, he would naturally be the figurehead for the idea, and any blowback would land on him.

It’s a message to his followers on what he wants, without directly tying himself to it. And it allows the various talking heads to use it as a springboard to normalize the idea before it is ever implemented. That way when the thing actually happens, his followers have already been primed to accept it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ach@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He is absolutely in a position to change this. It's become abundantly clear that we're way too culturally fractured as a nation and will never unify for any single cause. The DOJ is in his back pocket and there is zero chance all 350 million of us can put our differences aside to stop him, especially since a ton of people want this.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well he can't unilaterally cancel the elections, for example, you know California will hold elections. The question would be whether he gets congress to ignore the results of the midterms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 57 points 4 days ago

He's not in a position to break the US and International law either, but here we are..

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (16 children)

If elections are canceled so is work

[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can't work and riot at the same time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

it's a bit late for that.

If elections are cancelled so is the entire civic contract.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No taxation without represenatation applies here I'd say, yankees pitched a fit about it once before

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

That's already cancelled.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

“I won’t say cancel the election, they should cancel the election because the fake news will say ‘he wants the elections canceled. He’s a dictator.’ They always call me a dictator,”

Complete melted brain babble

But even if it’s successful, they don’t win. I don’t know what it is. There’s something psychological, like you vote against,”

People vote for you on concepts of a plan or don't vote because they think their life will be the same either way then they actually see what you do they turn out and vote. This isn't that hard.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 112 points 4 days ago (53 children)

Omg, I think the most eerie thing about this whole thing has been how perfectly all of this was predicted.

If it was a tv show I would say it’s lazy writing.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 89 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Almost like it's exactly according to a document someone published years ago.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but the fact that they published that, it actually hit critical mass, and they got elected to do it anyway is bonkers.

Or at least it should be

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shitler and the Turd Reich are going to commit as many crimes against the constitution and international law as they can until they are stopped

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

As a Canadian I'm not holding out much hope for the US later this year. If Trump doesn't stop elections, or rig their outcome, I'm not sure Democrats will muster the requisite votes because "both sides".

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Not sure what you're talking about. I'm not a nihilist. I believe in democracy and the rule of law, among many other beliefs and principles.

On the topic of Trump, I happen to think most Americans are not ready to do what must be done. I don't believe there is nothing that CAN be done. Do you understand the difference?

I have hope that there are individual Americans, or institutions, that will push back. But if it's successful I doubt it will be because Trump followed the law. There's no indication he cares about the law.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

"You will have to kill us to make us stop"

load more comments
view more: next ›