this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
153 points (95.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
3514 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
153
Supreme Court won’t fast-track ruling on Trump’s claim of immunity (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Supreme Court on Friday said it will not fast-track consideration of Donald Trump’s claim that he has immunity from prosecution for actions he took as president, a question crucial to whether he can be put on trial for plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

The court’s one-sentence order, from which there were no noted dissents, means a federal appeals court in Washington will be the first to review a district judge’s ruling earlier this month rejecting Trump’s claim of immunity. Arguments are scheduled for Jan. 9.

Special counsel Jack Smith had asked the justices to short-circuit the normal appellate process and quickly settle the question of presidential criminal immunity, which the Supreme Court previously has not been called upon to resolve. He said public interest required intervention now, so the federal election-obstruction trial of Trump — the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — could proceed as scheduled in March.

Archive

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 81 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

The GOP establishment, which the Federalist Society that now controls the SCOTUS represents, never liked Trump.

They spent decades turning their base into conspiratorial, counterfactual nitwits through the media they own because then they could easily tell them "climate change isnt real! Give rich people all the money! Poor people made bad decisions!" etc, and rob everyone blind to thunderous applause and their nitwits defending the owner's grift from the rest of us.

Then one day a notorious opportunist got up on stage, said the quiet parts out loud, co-opted that engineered willfull ignorance, and stole their nitwit brigade right out from under them. Remember, the turning point for Trump was the day he told the crowd he'd like to take protesters out back and "beat the shit" out of them. Prior to that he was hiring extras to attend his rallies.

The Machiavellian Mitch McConnells and John Roberts have been quietly seething ever since. Trump makes them feel dirty because he embodies the crassness of the con they've been leading their nitwit voters around by from a sterile distance. Their crass nitwits aren't supposed to bleed into their halls of power! Their careful, coordinated long game grift compromised by a 2 bit snake oil song and dance grifter.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think the people who want Trump removed from the ballot most are establishment Republicans. Not because of the fascism, but because of the populism and repeated lost elections. They won't challenge him in public because they might get primaried (or assassinated).

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Spot on, they've become pariahs within the party they thought they owned.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

They most certainly remember Trump turning his mob against Pence.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well said. This is something I was thinking recently when discussing the matter of Trump's disqualification from being on the ballot with my partner -- on the one hand, it's tempting to think that the Conservative appointees would definitely rule in favor of Trump and that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to him.

But on the other hand, at the end of the day isn't Trump really just a useful idiot for the real power behind the Republican party? He certainly didn't invent all the "issues" he ran on -- he just co-opted them while (as you say) saying the quiet parts out loud. Now he's getting even more divisive and a lot of people that previously thought he was harmless have seen how insane and dangerous he really is, even before January 6th.

With all that in mind, I think it's more likely that SCOTUS will wind up ruling that Trump is indeed disqualified under the 14th amendment so they can finally get him out of the way of the more serious candidates that will do what they want.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

I think it's more likely that SCOTUS will wind up ruling that Trump is indeed disqualified under the 14th amendment so they can finally get him out of the way of the more serious candidates that will do what they want.

And also protect their majority in the court by appearing unbiased.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Beautifully said!

The GOP establishment finally got its own “leopards eating MY face?” moment, which is a reversal they thought would never happen. Even though they caused it.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thank you!

I enjoy I eating their faces as much as the next filthy socialist, the sad thing is, in their cold, sociopathic mission to turn our country into a locked down, stable, generational capital farm/labor camp, they unleashed a fascist blaze that very well may burn them, their nitwits, and everyone else alive.

From the people's perspective, I'm honestly not sure what's worse, the ice of perpetual servitude for sociopaths, or the by comparison fast, unsustainable blaze of murderous, scapegoating hatred.

[–] Ton@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thank you for this! Very poetically written and so very true.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I wish I could give this comment gold.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

And we need to remember that if SCOTUS really was all-in for Trump, the majority wouldn't have rejected his challenges to the 2020 election.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I wonder why Pope Francis did not want it fast-tracked