this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
198 points (99.5% liked)

News

35703 readers
4044 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Our caucus members will oppose all funding for immigration enforcement in any appropriation bills until meaningful reforms are enacted to end militarized policing practices,” the caucus’s deputy chair, Ilhan Omar, who represents most of Minneapolis, told a press conference at the US Capitol.

“We cannot and we should not continue to fund agencies that operate with impunity, that escalate violence and that undermine the very freedoms this country claims to uphold.”

Pramila Jayapal, the top Democrat on the House judiciary subcommittee on immigration, said the caucus wanted provisions included in the homeland security appropriations bill that would prevent ICE agents from wearing masks, require warrants for them to make arrests and end the use of private detention facilities, which have been criticized for keeping detainees in squalid conditions.

“Because the abuses are so widespread and occur in so many different places, we have to address all of them,” Jayapal said.

The opposition from the progressives – who number about 100 members, all but one of whom are in the House – could complicate passage of the homeland security funding bill, which is still under negotiation between House and Senate appropriators. The legislation is one of 12 bills that Congress, which is controlled by the Republican party, must pass to fund the government, and is typically enacted with bipartisan support.

The top House Democrat, Hakeem Jeffries, echoed the progressives’ demands at a Monday press conference, saying: “Clearly, there are some commonsense measures that need to be put in place so that ICE can conduct itself in a manner that is at least consistent with every other law enforcement agency in the United States of America.”

On Tuesday evening, Democratic senators joined with hundreds of protesters outside the Washington DC headquarters of Customs and Border Protection, where they signaled support for using the homeland security appropriations bill to force changes at ICE.

“We must stop funding DHS and ICE thugs, and we must demand that ICE leave Minneapolis and other communities to prevent further escalation and tragic death,” Massachusetts’s Ed Markey told the crowd.

Chris Murphy of Connecticut was one of the first Democratic senators to back the strategy, and has described it as a way both to impose reforms on ICE and ensure that resources from other federal law enforcement agencies aren’t diverted to immigration enforcement.

"It is not too much to ask for the Congress to say this: if we are going to fund the Department of Homeland Security, we want to fund an agency that is simply complying with the law,” he told demonstrators.

Good’s death came after DHS agents fanned out across the Minneapolis area in an operation that was initially directed at its Somali community. Minnesota’s attorney general on Monday filed a federal lawsuit seeking to stop the operation, while Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, announced that hundreds more agents from ICE and other federal law enforcement agencies would be sent to the area.

Administration officials have defended the killing of Good, with Noem accusing her of “an act of domestic terrorism”.

The Democratic congresswoman Robin Kelly has announced she will file articles of impeachment against the homeland security secretary for “obstruction of justice, violation of public trust and self-dealing”.

Delia Ramirez, a member of the progressive caucus whose Chicago-area district was targeted by an ICE campaign last fall, said she supported impeaching Noem but argued for going further.

“We need to prosecute the criminals in masks. We need to cut and claw back ICE’s funding as natural consequences for DHS’s disregard for the rule of law and violations of our rights,” she said.

“We have to use every single tool, including the power of the purse, to end the campaign of terror.”

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The top House Democrat, Hakeem Jeffries, echoed the progressives’ demands at a Monday press conference, saying: “Clearly, there are some commonsense measures that need to be put in place so that ICE can conduct itself in a manner that is at least consistent with every other law enforcement agency in the United States of America.”

Common sense? I s2g... what the actual fuck is wrong with this guy? Even Joe Rogan can recognize Gestapo when he sees it.

I can't get a read on if Jefferies is a robot, or a conservative operative, or if he's even sure what he really is. Why do you refuse to just be a fucking human for one second instead of a politician?

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The democratic party is a conservative (right-wing) party. On the spectrum of rightwing ideology, they believe that technocratic hierarchies are natural and good. In the tradition of Edmund Burke, they think that if the right PEOPLE are in charge, good things will follow; policy be damned.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't know much about Burke, but my very limited understanding is that he was staunchly anti-egalitarian (and seemed to base his claims on the idea that the French revolution proved liberalism was inherently dangerous), so for him, the right person would have to be somebody who was opposed to any policy that promotes equality.

Obviously the label of Democrat has not held up the principles the party claimed, but progressive coalitions within the democratic party have. People like Jefferies don't seem to have much of an ideology other than promoting what they're being paid to advertise.

Basically, they're for sale to the highest bidder. I don't think that person would have to be an actual technocrat, whether you mean the idea of somebody with knowledge based on educational background and experience, or just somebody with wealth like Thiel/Musk/Bezos who sort of purchased the label of technocrat for themselves despite not really having any qualifications to make them an expert in what they want to be handed control over.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Jeffries' best quality is that the two easiest people to compare him to are Chuck Schumer and Mike Johnson and that, despite his best efforts, even he fails to limbo under those bars on a regular basis

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I can’t get a read on if Jefferies is a robot, or a conservative operative, or if he’s even sure what he really is

He’s a standard Democrat.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Or is he just a standard politician? Because AOC is a Democrat. Omar is a Democrat. Sanders is a Democrat.

Standard politicians are a bipartisan problem, and neither party has what can be considered a clean slate in context of all of American history.

•Following the civil rights movement, the majority of people who refused to pretend that a law righting a systemic injustice was somehow also forcing an unjust burden on society were mainly Democrats, but that was also because a lot of people switched parties due to Republicans embracing the southern strategy.

The Republican party at the time justified the use of the southern strategy to gain votes. Even though there were some Republicans who had legitimately previously supported desegregation, they ultimately decided winning an election was more important than their own values.

•Before the civil war, southern Democrats were primarily the main supporters of slavery and claimed states rights should allow them to continue slavery even after it was abolished. Many southern Democrats actually switched to the Republican party following the Republican party's embrace of the southern strategy.

•Since 2025, the Republican party has been weaponizing the federal government to stir up a second civil war, while also undoing what they claim are allegedly "unfair burdens to society and communities." They claim the civil rights act caused these "unfair financial burdens" by forcing public schools to obey the civil rights laws that were created to address discrimination. (It's a bullshit argument, but it's especially fucking dumb when you're also shutting down the department of education, and all other federal resources available to the schools you claim are being unfairly burdened. However, since the actual goal is to destroy America, why expect anything to make any fucking sense).

They are also using the civil rights act as a shield to do other bullshit (like demanding states hand over voter registration rolls along with last 4 digits of ssn and drivers license numbers) by claiming it grants the federal government sweeping authority and the right to strip away autonomy from state and local governments.

Aside from the fact that anyone should sort of inherently understand the difference between a federal government justifying intervening at a state or local level to protect equality for all of it's citizens (bc if a government isn't doing this, then why the fuck do you think it's supposed to exist in the first place?) vs intervening to undo those protections, and violate the constitutional rights and privacy of all of it's citizens. This passive aggressive bullshit also really glosses over the fact that the modern day conservative movement including the roots of Project 2025, can be boiled down to the supreme court and federal government finally telling wealthy individuals who ran private segregation academies, fine, you can continue to discriminate and be shitty but we can't keep giving you tax exemption while you do it. You have to pick one or the other.

Two things wealthy people in this country hate more than anything else: 1. Being told they can't be rewarded for discrimination and 2. Paying their fair share of taxes like everyone else.

And so began the past 50+ years of advertising lies, disinformation, and culture wars which brings us right back into the absolute stupidity that is present day America, and once again on the brink of a civil war.

To this very day, the wealthiest people who continue to exploit and bleed America and all Americans dry while destroying our constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties along with our standard of living, will gladly dump insane amounts of money into an advertising campaign spreading lies and misinformation, in order to fight the "unjust burden" of just paying their fucking taxes and being told they have to follow the law like everyone else.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Sanders is literally not a Democrat.

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We must stop funding DHS and ICE thugs

Also democrats:

2004: funds ice

2005: funds ice

2006: funds ice

2007: funds ice

2008: funds ice

2009: funds ice

2010: funds ice

2011: funds ice

2012: funds ice

2013: funds ice

2014: funds ice

2015: funds ice

2016: funds ice

2017: funds ice

2018: funds ice

2019: funds ice

2020: funds ice

2021: funds ice

2022: funds ice

2023: funds ice

2024: funds ice

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The 2013 to 2015 era is especially heinous.

2013: Obama appoints Tom Homan (current border Czar) to run ICE.

2014: Homan goes on record saying that separating children from parents is an effective means to discourage illegal border crossings.

2015: Obama awards Homan a Presidential Rank Award??

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

It's absolutely wild. Dems set all of this up, Trump exploits it so that capitalism can grow recklessly, Dems pretend to hem and haw about how horrible this is, they get back into power, they do nothing except continue funding ICE and the genocide.

[–] artimexthehybrid@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Most democrats aren't progressive.

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

Exactly my point. They are complicit in what's happening now, if you've paid even just a little bit of attention.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Does ml require you to all be both sidesers or is it a naturally self selecting phenomenon?

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

I mean, if you believe the Dems will actually follow through with this, after 2 decades of record funding, no material changes to how ICE operates, record deportations under Dem leadership, and 75+ dems currently cheering on ICE ... well, I have a bridge to sell you.

To address your attempted dig at me, it comes from actually reading books instead of consuming western propaganda media, which is owned and operated by the same billionaire oligarchs who are pulling the strings on your beloved Dems (and Reps).

Now, kindly get blocked. kthanxbai

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 weeks ago

Both sides? Motherfucker are you paying attention? They're all on the same side. It's us against them.

[–] artimexthehybrid@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago

It's a shame all democrats aren't progressive.

Truly a failure of the left.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

THIS is Unamerican!

-Chuck Schumer!

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Hey there ya go 👏

It took a min to get there, but literally all you have to do is acknowledge the reality of people shitting on the American constitution and murdering innocent people, and then telling America their eyes are deceiving them.

If Jefferies could muster the same enthusiasm, and throw this cautious language bullshit out the window, I would gladly stand and give him the belated applause he finally earned, even if other people want to call me a cowardly bootlicking centrist for doing it.

If/when he slips up again, I will gladly call him out on his bullshit, because THAT IS THE WAY A DEMOCRACY IS SUPPOSED WORK

The time for decorum and reputation preceding actions was over a long fucking time ago, and it's not coming back until we take it back (If we even want it back? I'd be glad to see that one go, but if you feel it's a tradition valuable enough to hold on to, then fight to get it back because we're about to lose it all).

It's "us" vs them. Not North vs South. Not Republicans vs Democrats. It's Americans vs Corporations, paid shills, and the class traitors "just following orders," to help destroy America, civil rights, civil liberties, and the entire democratic process.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago

Jeffries suuuuucks.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better than nothing, but their vow should've ended two words earlier.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 1 month ago

The "without reform" part is important, though.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

News: Democrats Start Funding Shutdown of ICE

House Democrat: ICE is a shitshow and we will cut all funding.

House Minority (Democratic) Leader: I agree

So-called-Leftists: DeMoCraTz aRe tHE WorSt!11! SouLLeSs CoRpOrATe sHiLLs wHo sHoULd aLL DiE!1! BoUrGeOiSe OppEsSor sWiNe-PiGs!1

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Story of my life: Too much of a "leftist" for loyalist Democrat town. Too much of a "centrist lib shit" for leftist town.

I move to form the Garden Party