this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
191 points (98.5% liked)

News

34308 readers
2719 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. President Donald Trump calls the vessel a new class of “battleship” graced by his own name, but China just calls the U.S. Navy’s latest concept a larger and “easier target” for its growing array of anti-ship drones and missiles.

A day after Trump’s Dec. 22 announcement at Mar-a-Lago that he had ordered the construction of a “Trump class” of possibly 20 to 25 battleships, China’s Global Times, a state media outlet, carried an interview with naval researcher Zhang Junshe stating that the type of warship envisioned by Trump would be a ripe target for China’s anti-ship weapons, including the so-called “carrier killer” DF-21D ballistic missile.

“The large size of a battleship also makes it more vulnerable and potentially an easier target, particularly when it is densely loaded with munitions,” according to Zhang, a researcher at the People’s Liberation Army Naval Military Academic Research Institute.

In the wake of the announcement, some analysts suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately be not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake the U.S. shipbuilding industry, which lags far behind China.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 65 points 3 days ago (3 children)

... instead a move by Trump to jolt awake the U.S. shipbuilding industry, which lags far behind China.

I think they're giving shit-for-brains way too much credit here.

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

More sanewashing from the complicit media

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Or some low level christo-fascist management dude at the heritage foundation, that knows nothing about anything had an idea. And now Americans will pay their lives and waste of taxes.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This always happens.

Trump: I'm gonna poop in the rose garden!

Sycophants: Of course the president isn't going to poop in the rose garden, the woke media is crazy.

Trump (while pooping in the rise garden): I'm pooping in the rose garden!

Sycophants: The rose garden is where terrorists come from.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

He's definitely shat in the Rose Garden. Some probably leaked down his leg and touched the ground there.

[–] hector@lemmy.today -1 points 3 days ago

The US navy is way bigger than China's, so I would question that the US shipbuilding industry lags China. I would also recognize that contractors wanting more money spent pump articles warning us about China and saying China is outpacing us.

Like in the cold war, the ussr was constantly overhyped in capability to justify more spending.

I know China is quick building ships. I do however doubt they are anywhere near the US, no matter how many ships they are working on right now or what. I also highly doubt the US should increase yet again our navies size.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 17 points 3 days ago

Everyone has called them that for decades, half a century or more. Big battleships are a thing of the past, ww2 their last hurrah. They are too vulnerable and with the weapons out there, it's better to have more smaller ships than a single big one that could be taken out with one missile or torpedo or mine breaking through.

This is like Hitler getting personally involved in weapons decisions in the war. At one point he took machine guns off the top of tanks for whatever reason he got into his head, determined he was the smartest person in the world. Turned out making them even more of sitting ducks to infantry on the eastern front.

Likewise our leader is surrounded by yes men. No one will tell him he's wrong, and if they did they would be removed from their positions. So you get outdated super battleships rather than the frigates we have been making.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Motherfucker doesn't understand you get things named after you by people who respect you after you're gone, not by your own decision. Classless moron.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

US: The Trump Centre for Destroying American Hegemony. :applause:

China: :popcorn:

Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

He knows. He just craves the attention.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s just a scam like everything else he does, a mechanism to move money around and funnel it to his political patrons, friends, and family. No doubt everyone involved knows that battle ships are basically obsolete among the great powers. It’ll end up being a comical piece of shit, but several people will have made a lot of money off the contracts.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

That's the thing, putting his name on everything, being supremely corrupt, does he not realize after he's gone his name will be removed? Does he think even is successor will continue to revere his name rather than blame problems on him?

Or does he not care? Like the peace prize, even though he knows everyone around his is pretending to think he's great he doesn't care? It's really a case study in late stage mental illness. Where his illness is laid bare by dementia and old age and any pretense is stripped of his actions.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago

It's called the Trump class because it's full of Bubba's sea-men

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

A fart class boat. Probably be fat and ugly and barely able to actually DO anything...

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good point, but look at the catapults it’ll have for launching fighters. Proper traditional steam catapults with analogue warmth, none of that modern digital rubbish.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

And they'll paint camouflage all over them, for "stealth".

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Put Trump on it and use it as a decoy.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Who would have thought …

Ho wait everyone

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I'm surprised they didn't just stay quiet in public (and laugh their asses off in private). China usually seems to keep their cards fairly close to their chest...

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"China calls..." and it's some dude.

Imagine if newspapers used this convention for random American civilian citizens in headlines too.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

some dude

It’s not like he’s a random civilian, he literally works for the PLA.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

So do millions of others.