this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
443 points (99.6% liked)

News

34656 readers
4554 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love that they are specifically calling out Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller. He's behind MOST of the worst stuff in MAGA, especially all the racist and immigration stuff. The guy really has a bug up his ass about non-white people.

Most of America has no idea who he is, but to know him is to be reviled by him. He is easily one of the most repellent people on the planet, and not surprisingly, so is his wife. He's so awful, that the word was that when he entered the first MAGA administration, he was still a virgin in his 30s, because women wouldn't go near him. He met his wife in the White House. Apparently she comes from a family that routinely uses the N-word at the dinner table. I'm sure he felt right at home, like he'd found his people.

The Dems should make him one of the main faces of the Midterm campaign, because he is easy to hate, and people will eagerly vote against him. Blame him for ALL this immigration stuff because he is responsible. The orders to start killing American protesters, and send a message, almost certainly started with him.

We can't vote him out, but we can make him such a liability that MAGA will eject him themselves. Or maybe not. Maybe they'll double down, and let him get worse, and we can enjoy his eventual execution with even more satisfaction.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

By the way, did you see what the Vanity Fair photographer did to him on the last White House photo shoot? It's a stroke of editorial genius:

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He looks a little like Il Duche.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

He looks a little like Il Duche

Lil Douche you say?

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My thoughts exactly, with maybe a sprinkling of Al Capone:

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capone had some humanity and deserves more respect than fucking Miller.

Capone is why we have expiration dates on milk!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Douche! Douche! Viva il Douche!

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, but also let's be careful about scapegoating when the entire administration is to blame. It's not like their removal will make fascism go away, it'll just be less obnoxious, more easy to ignore.

In for a penny, in for a pound, they all must go.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Not just go, these people are covering up crimes and conspiring to create conditions where more crimes will occur. They need to go to jail.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is an interadministrational problem. DHS and ICE were created two decades ago and have been overseen by both Democratic and Republican executive administrations and congressional legislatures.

This is what they agree on, this is the plan. You are in a pincer movement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pincer_movement

[–] Soulg@ani.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Democrats overseeing and agreeing to what DHS and ICE were doing in the past is a problem. Nobody disagree with that.

You cannot claim that they are also in favor of what they're doing now under trump in good faith. It's both sides bullshit and just completely fucking wrong and only exists to sow division.

Two thoughts can exist on someone at the same time. The death of nuance is the death of the country

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The Democrats have gone out of their way plenty to chill dissent and actively expand the police state, but let’s see how this budget discussion goes. Besides their own nefarious actions abroad with the wars and persecution of journalists and whistleblowers and whatnot, I see the myriad of inventive ways the Democrats use to “steal defeat from the jaws of victory”, and this forms a clear composite picture of deliberate collaboration. That could change, but right now I see both political parties playing “good cop/bad cop”, both political parties intent on normalizing paramilitary secret police in the streets.

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 110 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Our demand is clear: Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who was responsible for carrying out the policy that led to Alex’s needless killing, and Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, the architect of that policy, must resign immediately. If they refuse, President Trump must dismiss them," AFGE National President Everett Kelley said in a statement.

“Public reporting has established that Mr. Miller is the driving force behind the administration’s harsh immigration agenda," he continued. "He personally directed its implementation and used high-pressure tactics to force compliance across the federal government. These were not abstract policy choices. They were imposed from the top and enforced without regard for the consequences."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 44 points 1 day ago

I LOVE that they are calling out Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller so forcefully. It's long past time to move past blaming the ICE Apes they keep putting on TV, and get to the real source of the problem.

PeeWee Himmler is America's biggest MAGA problem. He is Trump's Wormtongue, whispering poison into Trump's ear all day. Nobody knows how to manipulate Trump better than PeeWee, and he's got him twisted around his little finger. Get rid of PeeWee, and Trump will be mostly rudderless, just focusing on his own corruption, instead of policy.

And corruption is something we can prosecute him for.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

It's something (words -- maybe not 'something' in these times). But will the union demand their members to strike? I mean, that's the most (only) meaningful action a Union can do; it's sort of what they're for, right? Right?

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's a felony for federal workers to strike. Kinda makes you wonder why federal employees even have unions, but that's the capitalist hellscape we live in...

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I am outside the US so I didn't know this. So... Unions, whose biggest and perhaps only effective weapon against exploitation, the strike, cannot, by law, call for a strike. And it's a federal offense for federal workers to do so?

Wow. Just Wow. Why even have a union?

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The last time federal workers went on strike, Reagan fired every air traffic controller. We're still trying to recover from THAT, 40 years on.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

We're also about to have a mass retirement because of it

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know people involved in some of these unions. They still fight for federal workers and are successful at times in assisting them with so many other things. They negotiate contracts (like collective bargaining agreements) and seek more fair workplace practices, they represent workers in disputes, they scrutinize HR and administrative practices, and they bring lawsuits in federal courts.

Yes, they don't have the teeth of large strikes, but it's still helping them in the sense of banding together and pooling resources. Of course, this fucking piece of shit administration has just unilaterally taken away a lot of things and exposed a lot of the flaws in the system. From what I know, morale is in the shitter for most normal, everyday, civilian federal workers who simply wanted to provide a good public service and pay their bills.

Note that I think it being illegal to strike is fundamentally un-constitutional and un-American. But hey, not much of the U.S. is how we feel it should be.

[–] Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub 12 points 1 day ago

The only purpose of police unions is to come out in solidarity when one of their own fucks up. Like if a teacher's union rallied around the teacher every time they were accused of inappropriate contact with a student. The union would back the teacher and besmirch the student. That's how law enforcement unions work in the U.S.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

I don't know if this ever happened and I only have experience as a government contractor. I think ICE and CBP might have different rules, but...

The "loophole" to strike is if and only if the union can't reach an agreement on terms to extend their CBA then there is no legal requirement to not strike. Meaning if the negotiations go sideways and the other side isn't negotiating in good faith as far as raises, healthcare, PTO, etc then the union members can vote to not accept the CBA. if the CBA ends so does the obligation to not strike.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Unions can strike. Unions of critical services workers, like air traffic control and police, can not legally. This is the first time I read that federal employees can not.

Unions can still be useful, even if their most powerful tool is taken away.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a felony for federal workers to strike.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

Felony, in a lawless land? Break your chains.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They can still do a work slowdown. Have just enough folk call in sick. Also this gives voice to what could become a national general strike. They're also directly calling out Steven Miller so hopefully that embarrasses the administration enough to oust him from his military base accommodations.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

But will the union demand their members to strike? I mean, that's the most (only) meaningful action a Union can do; it's sort of what they're for, right? Right?

Do you think strikes are the only thing unions do?

[–] Lumun@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Massive American unions usually have anti-strike clauses (in this case it's actually a law), so they will never be able to go that far. Outside organizations would need to organize wildcat strikes of those workers instead. I would say a good strong union even with a clause could still prep their members to respond to a strike call though, they just can't legally do it themselves

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Its The American Federation of Government Employees. Title makes it sound like it's a union representing Border Patrol agents. It's not. It's representing all federal employees who obviously are not happy with the current administration because of massive layoffs and the shutdown.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, it also represented pretti according to the article

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago

Miller getting removed is a wet dream

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I beleive that USA has something called "Fellony Murder" (or similar)?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

An early start on the Good German myth then.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A prerequisite for being a good German is to do nothing to resist, this is at least something.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Part of the myth is the “clean Wehrmacht” myth, in which it was falsely claimed that the regular military weren’t involved in war crimes and crimes against humanity, they were just soldiers following orders, and that they would have been shot if they hadn’t participated. Complete bullshit of course, but the Western Allies didn’t want to have to occupy Germany indefinitely and they needed a force to take over.

This isn’t resistance, this is just laying out groundwork for when the trials happen.

Yeah, except the clean Wehrmacht myth was also primarily about pardoning generals and officers, not protecting rank and file soldiers.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Would you rather they said nothing?

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Not knowing the name of a single concept is not really about education funding.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If it gets Miller out… maybe we let this one play out.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

Or else what?