this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
890 points (99.6% liked)

politics

28095 readers
2277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cable news people call them “prison camps” or “Trump prison camps,” but look in any dictionary: prisons are where people convicted of crimes are held. As Merriam-Webster notes, a prison is:

“[A]n institution for confinement of persons convicted of serious crimes.”

But what do you call a place where people who’ve committed no criminal offense (immigration violations are civil, not criminal, infractions)? The fine dictionary people at Merriam-Webster note the proper term is “concentration camp”:

“[A] place where large numbers of people (such as prisoners of war, political prisoners, refugees, or the members of an ethnic or religious minority) are detained or confined under armed guard.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Because Netflix. The circus is strong.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same reason Donald Trump is president.

A significant percentage of Americans are too ignorant to know what's happening around them.

And another significant percentage are bigots who like it.

That's why this ship will almost certainly continue sinking after the orange rapist is dead.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

had three women in an suv give slack for our friday return commute protest. It just blows my mind. their stuff is always. go trump if not an explexitive aimed at us. I mean you are yelling at signs talking about he should not ignore the constitutiion. its so surreal in some ways. all the while they are surrounded by cars giving us waves, thumbs up, peace signs. I honestly am not sure if they see how they are the only ones who are ok with this among the whole crowd at the traffic light.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 183 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

Because everything is on fire all at once, people are scared/exhausted/lack any actual leadership (Fuck you Schumer) and when that happens people hunker down, until something so atrocious happens it breaks through the fog of fear.

Couple that with every major media company being owned by facist Trump Cronies and well… yea

And before some asshat starts going “Then why don’t you do something?” Look out your front door. You willing to go murder your neighbor right now? Because that’s what it’ll come to, a massive civil war. So yeah, nothing is happening yet but the rumbles are there and we are all fucked no matter the outcome.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 91 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Quite so. Everyone lambasting Americans right now seems to forget it was the rest of the world that had to come save the Germans from the Nazis.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wait wait wait wait, where does this idea come from that the German people weren't to blame for Nazism? They were to blame. They were blamed. Their country was partitioned, their army was dismantled, their families were torn apart, and they endeavored to teach future generations what they did wrong. It did not even remotely make up for their nation's crimes against humanity, but they were "lambasted".

Do not weaponize history to justify your own apathy. These lessons were paid in blood. Yet new blood is being shed, and every American who does not fight against the regime is responsible. Yes, it's an unfair ask; no-one wants to live through troubled times. But you are living in them so stop cowering behind historical wrongs to feel better about your inaction.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because everything is on fire all at once, people are scared/exhausted/lack any actual leadership (Fuck you Schumer)

According to him, the people are "aroused".

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l9tTU1dgDwg

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wtaf? Please tell me this is some ai bullshit….

Fucking aroused? That’s insanity. We aren’t aroused, you fuck face, we’re pissed. And some of it is dorected at you, Chuck!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's meaning "aroused" in the dictionary sense, aka "Brought to a state of great psychological tension."

However, it'd be nice if the dude was at least aware enough to know that it sounds very much like he's downplaying the situation for one, and secondly, even though some Americans might know the dictionary definition of "aroused" doesn't necessarily mean it's about someone that has a boner...many do not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 90 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Every major media outlet is controlled by someone that is a member of the Epstein club.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And daily reminder for everyone: just because they caught Epstein doesn't mean this sort of shit stopped. It just passed to new management.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Curious as to why Common Dreams and others aren't using the term "Internment Camp"? I'm not trying to whitewash the present, but it does seem to me that a large number of people might feel that term "concentration camp" is a dramatization of the current situation. "Internment" is also awful but less loaded, and might get more people on board and thinking about this seriously. Thoughts?

Edit: Upon looking it up, I have a few thoughts. One, some say "internment camp" was white washing in the first place. Two, "internment camps" might specifically refer to U.S. Army run concentration camps during wartime. I'm still not really clear, though, and would love some additional insight.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Internment camps are built for criminal reasons or to hold political prisoners. Concentration camps are built for eugenics purposes - to concentrate, contain, and control a target ethic group or population. ICE does not exist to address a crime problem. It exists to address the 'problem' that America will soon no longer be a white majority country.

The term concentration camp is accurate. When your goal is to engineer the demographics of an entire country, then you're firmly in the territory of concentration camps. If Trump announced a new open-air prison to hold thousands of "Antifa members," then that facility would be an internment camp. A facility is labeled based on who it holds:

Actual criminals guilty of real crimes like rape, murder, etc.: prison/jail

Political prisoners: internment camp

Targeted ethnic/demographic groups: concentration camp

[–] Ogy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Upvoting simply because I love to see people challenging their own opinions

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

because at the national level it’s not an emergency. it’s the plan all along.

it’s a human emergency and the leaders need nuremberg trials.

but from all sides of the aisles it’s not at all an emergency to them.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Controlled opposition. They think the republican's extremism is just performative and they are playing bad cop to the d good cop still, despite the fact the administration is clearly playing hitler.

If democrats were involved in systematic voter fraud for decades, they would have to be punished. It doesn't matter what Republican power brokers, ivy league suits they went to school with when they both joined those secret clubs whereby they hire business and government leaders almost exclusively, have assured them, that they won't persecute them. They would have to be punished. And they will be, the republicans are already gearing up for it, fixing elections, and projecting that on the democrats, and using the awesome power of the state to suppress the opposition.

One would've thought the democrats after 2020 at the latest would've realized that to save the republic, and themselves, they would've needed to change strategy, to not be good cop whose mission is crushing popular reform for the rich, but rather to offer popular reform, to win and set up a political machine that would dominate and prevent the republicans from getting in running as reform, and fixing the system.

I'm sick of arguing it, the cheerleaders don't argue in good faith, they can't, they can only obscure the issue with slander, personal attacks, misclassifying the situation. Yet we are grown, we can see what happened, it's beyond dispute. These democrats leading the opposition is tantamount to surrendering to the Republicans. There is no scenario where we don't end up in a fascist one party state under reigns of terror indefinitely with these democrats leading us.

That is step 1, we have to organize to get there, but we can't skip ahead to other steps if that one doesn't get completed. Get your fucking head straight America, we need real leadership.

load more comments (1 replies)

Multiple reasons.

  1. As is always the case when fascism, authoritarianism or similar takes over, things happen slowly, and there's a reason for that: humans notice fast changes very quickly, but not necessarily slow changes. They didn't start building these concentration camps yesterday. This has been going on for a while.

  2. Because at least right now, there isn't the stated goal of keeping people there, but just keeping them there in the intermediate term. We all know where this is going, but it does make it a little more difficult to use that term.

  3. The Trump administration has a habit of suing the press. This has already had a chilling effect. See CBS, BBC, and I think ABC as well. They have decided that it does not make sense financially to fight it, and there are probably a number of lawyers much smarter than I who know what they're talking about. And since most major news sources are profit-driven and public broadcasting is chronically underfunded, that's all you get.

  4. The word "concentration camp" often gets confused with the word "death camp", and we have failed to properly differentiate. How often do you hear about the Nazi concentration camps where they killed people on an industrial scale. No, those were death camps (they had concentration camps as well). But the term has been used wrongly for so long that when people hear "concentration camp", they think "death camp", so calling it a concentration camp, while correct, could make a fair number of people think the wrong thing - as of now, there is no systematic extermination, and I hope we get a handle on this before it gets that far.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If everything is a national emergency, nothing is.

I am appalled at how well "flood the zone" and "move fast and break things" works to destroy a nation. If sanity ever returns, the response to either action needs to be the death penalty. I don't know how to properly write a law for that, but it is clear to me that any lesser response will only cause the bastard to back up, and try again.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The ground work for this was set up long before the bull arrived at the China shop.

Remember the reason he can run roughshod over everything is because Congress and the courts are not doing everything.

Edit: anything

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

I've been calling them concentration camps the whole time. It's obvious that's what they are. Fuck the media outlets.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Because America is the Greatest Country in the World, and the beacon of freedom and democracy. A beacon of freedom and democracy wouldn't build vast concentration camps, therefore we cannot acknowledge that that's what America is doing. We need to keep acting like Trump's biggest failings are liking fast food and stumbling over words.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

and because big money controls the news agencies.

and Americans live a month of horrors every fucking week under Trump, both last term and this one.

and average americans are too poor to deal with their own personal healthcare needs

Or to buy food.

Who are facing very real possibility of being murdered in the streets for daring to speak up, and even if they dont get murdered today, its always been openly bragged about that facial recognition is being used to build vast databases of anyone who dare protest der fuhrer so that they might have to face the horror of some time, months down the road, gestapo thugs could kick in their door and send their underage daughters to oligarchal service camps while the rest of them are, at best, dumped in hostile countries or at worst disappeared and executed.

and despite all that, people are still fighting in the streets. People are still confronting this. They are doing everything they can, while NOT giving trump the excuse he needs to masturbate furiously over his war president fantasies by triggering civil war 2 and ordering the military in to purge everyone who doesnt share his every opinion.

But you keep sitting there, serving your masters agenda of trying to paint the opposition as lazy, and feckless, who are doing nothing more than making fun of what he eats.

It easily reveals who you really are, and what your real goals are.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, 100%. Just one little clarification. Once they are done with whatever they are going to do to those brown people, they aren't going to close the camps and shrink their wealthy agency, they'll just alter their mission...

Which will be slavery. The 13th Amendment allows prisoners to be used as slave labor, and PeeWee Himmler and Trump can't wait to get into the slavery business. Imagine how supercharged the economy and the stock market will be, when 90% of the labor force can be replaced by AI, Robotics, or Federally-managed Slave Labor?

Except this time, they aren't going to racist about it, the Federal government will be an equal opportunity enslaver. Anybody is welcome, all you have to do is be a political critic, or a Democrat, or even a MAGA, if you aren't rich enough. The only ones who will be safe from enslavement will be Sociopathic Oligarchs and their Nepo-Babies.

Here we thought the Mexicans, et al, were going to take all our jobs, when in reality it will be Official Government Slaves.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They've literally openly talked about, for over a year, about wanting to send all the sick and mentally ill to "work farms"

and what are they trying desperately to say is a mental illness? Opposing trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Anyone else just really impressed by how well “the boys” tv show predicted all this?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

No, because I can't shake the feeling that I'll be watching a documentary in a decade or two and learn that these Nazis took multiple ideas from works of fiction meant to be a warning.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was all predicted in The Newsroom 14 years ago. That was the start of media enshittification.

It was also predicted in House of Cards, where social media could be used to influence any opinion in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because the majority of people in the US still think this won't directly affect them.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Had my dad literally and unironically say "yeah but that stuff isn't going to matter to us cuz we live in a small town, there's only trouble in the big cities."

My father in christ what do you think will happen if the single grocery store in your small town doesn't get shipments anymore from the "big city"? Idk. They just think everything can crumble around them but they'll be untouched.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The sad thing is they're mostly right. Life under authoritarianism stays much the same for most people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Not only are people dying inside the camps (as the article correctly points out), but after they are deported as well:

https://www.latintimes.com/four-haitian-women-were-deported-puerto-rico-they-have-now-been-found-decapitated-594261

Or they are offloaded to prisons that are notorios for human rights abuses:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/08/americas/el-salvador-cecot-prison-deportees

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Because it's what the voters of America asked for. Twice.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Cause he has 70 million supporters. And the army. And ICE. And has captured federal institutions.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

With nationwide injunctions forbidden people could be thrown in without habeous corpus and disappeared and there would be no way to stop them. They could stymie and challenge any court cases filed, they could drag out the proceedings, challenge standing, they could move the person around, and not tell anyone.

With the nationwide injunctions they would only be able to get a week or two grabbing people without cause, or hearings. Now the could keep it up indefinitely, each person having to seek relief themselves, if the administration allows them, and each at the mercy of the district they are in.

That decision was a huge betrayal, and we are at the mercy of the worst people in the world and will suffer irreparable harm before we will get a chance to challenge lawless government action, and our media didn't see it, or tell us about it when they did, even media I like. Just further goes to show we have all the wrong people in charge.

Oh there is a national emergency.

Their emergency is "threats to national security" such as foreign-born non-whites like me, cuz half of the country doesn't care about constitutional violations and authoritarianism

load more comments
view more: next ›