this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
1018 points (90.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38702 readers
6313 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 215 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (59 children)

Also you guys are fucking idiots.

“If you don’t pick a better candidate then I’ll just let the one who wants concentration camps and to erase all of Palestine win”

Like, seriously, look at the big picture. Do you think Kamala who would have still supported Israel would have been worse for Gaza? It’s literally not possible. You guys fucked up the entire planet in your pride.

Now I’m not saying the DNC isn’t wrong, they’re fucking morons. But you guys just gave up on global warming, gay rights, trans rights, Gaza, any sembles of the environment, public health, the entire “justice” system, the courts, your immigrant neighbours, all people of colour in the US, and women’s rights.

I cannot express how much I fucking hate people like you right now.

Go ahead and downvote me. “But it’s not right”. Yeah? We’ll choosing to let this happen is leagues worse. You guaranteed the genecide in Gaza would be the worst it ever could be you fucking morons.

Go out and pressure the DNC to not be shit, but don’t fucking say there’s no difference between Kamala and Trump.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 104 points 1 month ago (14 children)

i'm glad i'm not the only one shitting on 3rd party/abstainers every chance i get. high and mighty morality police, usually saying shit like "kamala was always going to lose" while simultaneously trying to push the 100% guaranteed fail action of 3rd party or sitting out.

whether they're actually russian propaganda trolls or not hardly matters--they're shit human beings either way

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Agreed. But I'm not going to publicly endorse a dead-end DNC loser before it's necessary. The DNC needs to act like people aren't required to vote for them and field a candidate that can actually win votes.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 30 points 1 month ago

That's valid! More than valid it's necessary. Show resistance against weak DNC libs AS LONG AS POSSIBLE, but possible ends when it's time to vote. Then always choose the option that is best or, if necessary least damaging.

If you don't vote against the biggest fascist, you are helping fascism along.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 51 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yes! Primaries primaries primaries.

Go and primary every single DNC candidate that isn't good enough, get better democratic candidates wherever you can. Put even more energy into primaries than into the election itself! But when the decision comes down to Churchill or Hitler, you better vote for fucking Churchill.

Everything else is just throwing the minorities and the future under the bus as a cost of doing business.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wanna know how to pressure the DNC to pick a candidate you like? Go fucking vote for them in the primary!

Typically, the primaries get 1/10th the turnout of the general election. That means that a very small number of people can sway the primary. Go stump for your candidate. Make phone calls, talk to your family and friends and community, explain why your candidate is the better choice.

The lack of a primary in 2024 was fucking awful, but guess what? Chances are, there is a primary going on for your state right now, get to work!

[–] punkcoder@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (26 children)

Try telling that to someone who supported Bernie, but before you do that you might want to go back and refresh youself on what happened. The DNC is a diseased carcass, change isn't possible.

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 26 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yeah...

To the people "wanting to teach the DNC a lesson", in the nicest way possible, you're fucking idiots.

They threw literally ever other minority group under the bus, and got absolutely nothing for it - if anything they actually got less than nothing, because Trump wasn't just going soft on Israel, he was actively cheering them on!

I will never understand the mentality of choosing that hill to die on... Like couldn't you guys have waited until Trump was at least off the board first.

Man was literally on his way to a lifetime in jail and bankruptcy, that he got out of scot-free because you guys decided 2024 was the time for a protest vote.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Go out and pressure the DNC to not be shit

How about you go out and draw the rest of the owl there? The main power we have is our right to vote, and you're saying we shouldn't use that to pressure the DNC to put forth a pro-worker anti-war candidate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

This continues to be the stupidest, least productive way to think about elections. The lesser of two evils argument may be true, but it failed to motivate people to vote for Kamala in 2024 (or Hillary in 2016, for that matter). You can bitch about protest votes or an apathetic electorate all you want, but at the end of the day, you don't win elections if you don't get votes, and, "yEaH, bUt TrUmP iS wOrSe," didn't get votes. If the Democrats once again run a candidate who doesn't reflect their base and once again lose the election, it will once again be their fault for repeating a losing strategy that produces losing candidates.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MTZ@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I'm a leftist who absolutely voted Harris, because the other option was horrific. I was not in love with Kamala but I did feel that she was a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar better option. But I will not lie, I know several people who were basically exactly like the people you are talking about. It's disheartening.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)
[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 113 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Its funny how people act as if kamala lost because she supported genocide

No lol, leftists hold miniscule power in electorate, kamala lost because she ran a shitty campaign and neo liberal economics will only make things worse for incumbent.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

neo libs must choose… either there is not enough progressives to demand a progressive candidate so they are not a large enough block to have changed the outcome OR they are large enough bloc to demand progressive cannidate and the democrats ignoring them cost them the election.

and they always pivot talking points

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Schrodinger's Left: small enough for Dems to ignore, large enough to make Dems lose

[–] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The enemy is both strong and weak.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

America doesn't have a left wing. America has a right wing and an extreme right wing. The closest to an actual leftist that America has is Mamdani, and America's so-called left wing politicians tried their best to make him look evil.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don’t forget Bernie and AOC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itistime@infosec.pub 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Some factors for losing:

  • People were already salty that Biden even decided to run again, and then he forced a different candidate upon the voters.
  • Status quo
  • Woman
  • Not white
  • Zionism apologist
  • Obviously dumb strategy to ditch the “weird” name calling, and placate the right.
  • I not sure what to call it, but there is definitely an issue in our country of picking the “popular kid”, or “cool kid”

Her loss was a combination of many factors, including the support of genocidal Zionism. Do not ignore it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I voted for Kamala, but I was pissed we didn't have a fucking primary. If we had a primary, we might have gotten Bernie on the ballot, or Elizabeth Warren, or Butegig, or anyone else. But instead Biden claimed to be running, then dropped out at the last minute so opps no time for primaries. I'm salty as hell that democrats didn't get a choice. It felt deliberate and coordinated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also I don't think voters appreciated having her shoved in at the last minute.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Kamala lost because it was obvious from the beginning that she was a bad candidate whose only hope of becoming President was to be parachuted into the role via the 25th Amendment once Biden's mental state truly deteriorated. Unfortunately for her and the DNC, Biden's condition declined right as a key presidential debate rolled around, and his declining cognitive health became so utterly apparent that not even Reddit's tyrannical cabal of power mods could cover it up anymore.

Before that debate, even merely suggesting that Biden was senile would have gotten you labelled a Nazi and banned from at least a dozen subreddits.

THAT is why she lost to a convicted felon.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Its very hard to discern the real reason Harris lost in the election. Especially with interference the Right orchestrated with mail in voting and voting IDs, they tanked the left's momentum while gassing Trump's reelection with actual fraud. The results of numerous investigations was that if someone committed fraud or voted twice it was for a Republican candidate... but don't worry isn't not like Trump controlled the swing districts and threw away votes for Harris.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 75 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Harris chose to lose the most winnable election in history because Democrats know they can punish voters for being disloyal simply by allowing Republicans to win. If you demand too much from Democrats they will throw the election. It's essentially a hostage situation, you must give unconditional support to the Good Cop or the Bad Cop will beat you to death. You don't want the Bad Cop, do you?

If we don't abolish this system we're all going to die.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 45 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Only a moron would have looked at the two options we had and not picked Harris.

Was she a good candidate? Actually yes if you look at her Senate voting history. She was closer to Sanders than any other senator. She also, as VP, supported investigating Israel so they could bypass the law requiring us to give support.

Did she run a good campaign? Absolutely not. But, she basically had no time to actually run one. She needed money, fast, so she softened her stance on some things to secure it.

Was it a bad move? Yes. Was it a bad enough move to let Donald "I'm going to be a dictator on day one and you'll never have to vote again" Trump win? Absolutely not.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Do you think you're going to be able to reason with someone who literally just said that the Democrats threw the election on purpose because online leftists "demanded too much"?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Harris chose to lose the most winnable election in history

Dems already shat the bed in 2022, handing Republicans a narrow majority in the House because they refused to pursue Congressional criminal misconduct from the prior administration or do anything about state voter disenfranchisement or gerrymandering while they controlled the federal government. Nevermind the clown car of corporate toadies and unloveable hacks they larded up with corporate donations.

Little reason to believe they'd do better in 2024, given that Biden made "supporting a genocide" and "rolling back COVID benefits" his central platforms for the next two years.

How is an election "winnable" when your party is married to policies everyone hates? It's like complaining about Mitt Romney losing in 2012, when Obama was underwater. The GOP trotted out an absolutely odious corporate turd - a man who literally penned the editorial "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" four years earlier - and married him to a nepo-baby who hates social security as VP. Of course they fucking lost.

You don't get to talk about an election being "winnable" if you insist sandbagging the primaries to run loser candidates in the general.

2024 was Trump's election to lose. He capitalized on people's disgust with liberals. He leaned heavily on TPUSA, QAnon, and other effective social media campaigns to juice MAGA support. He promised to bail out TikTok, the only company that wasn't run by an American oligarch, while Biden was threatening to run them out of business. He rallied his base voters while liberals embarked upon the worst internal voter suppression campaign since 1968. And he did it all as fascist tendencies in the US were cresting.

Harris wasn't running a winnable campaign. She was struggling (badly) to bail out a floundering Biden debacle.

If we don’t abolish this system we’re all going to die.

Everyone dies eventually. But this government seems intent on accelerating things.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 42 points 1 month ago (7 children)

By that logic, no one should have supported racist America and colonist Britain against the Nazis.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schmoo@startrek.website 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (17 children)

So we're just going to hash this out every single day for the next 2 years, huh?

Edit: I do find it interesting how many replies to this comment are vague enough that you can't determine which side of this argument they're on, but I guess I did start it myself.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Imagine a group thinking Palestine swung the needle at all on US elections. ROFL...

That is getting close to "flat earth" level of denial.

Kamela ran a horrible, lame, corporate platform.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

DNC will throw an election before moving to the left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The meme is unironically true though. I hate the candidates that the dnc puts forward, but I hate the opposition more. 2016 and 2024 kinda shows how the meme is unfortunately rather accurate, and I heard plenty of people advocating for not voting for Kamala because of stances that trump was objectively worse on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If Trump runs again you’ve fucked up. He can’t just run for a third term.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Trump can be long dead and buried, yet I feel like he's still going to be running in every US election for the next few decades. The majority of his supporters have only doubled down on his brand of politics, so there will always be another Trump.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Have the republicans even bothered to give a name for 2028?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fact that they've been memeing about Trump having a third term tells you how excited they are about their actual prospects.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 18 points 1 month ago

Here in Texas, our leading candidates for Senate (James Talarico) and governor (Gina Hinojosa) are taking refreshingly reality-based positions on Gaza and seem to be developing campaigns aimed directly against billionaires. I like what I've been hearing

load more comments
view more: next ›