I'm not convinced that there's anywhere near as many straight people as straight people pretend there are. It's gotta be closer to like fifty-fifty split between straight and bi/pan/ace/and so on.
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
679 points (98.7% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
38247 readers
5407 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sexuality exists on a spectrum, imo. There are a few people who are totally straight, a few who are totally gay, but the vast majority fall somewhere in the middle. I do not feel that sexuality is a binary for most people. Of course, I could be completely wrong. I'm no scientist.
I know everyone says it, but labels are pretty useless.
Even terms like "masculine" and "feminine" hold so much dumb baggage they're both functionally useless.
I know guys who want to be subservient to pretty girls, and girls who want stocky girls to dominate them.
Sexuality doesn't fit neatly into boxes, even in the best of circumstances - so much of it is contextual, and is pointless to attempt to pin down.
Labels are just succinct words/phrases that try to give people some approximate idea of where we fall on a handful of vast spectrums. They're not meant to be 100% accurate.
I'm probably pansexual, but I tell people I'm bi because that's a word most people are familiar with. And even then I'm like 80-90% into women. So I don't really fit neatly into the bisexual box, but that label conveys enough relevant information.
Is that you, Robert California?
No, I'm his Mexican half brother, twice removed. I'm JosΓ© Colorado. Nice to meet you!
God I wish they'd stop removing our Mexican brothers
Yeah this is what I've always thought.
I believe I'm straight but if a guy presented feminine enough I'd be attracted to them. Only problem is I don't like penises but if you can hide it I'm all in
I'm not even convinced we really managed to universally agree to uniform definition of what straight actually is. As long as that's the case people, who want to be "normalβ, will just stretch and twist the definitions to fit in, if they can fit in that way.
That's a problem with everything though. No matter what definition for something you come up with, even if most of population agrees with it, you'd have aggresively vocal minority that will try and push it other way to conform it to their perception/goals etc.
Straight means that, for example, as a man you are sexually attracted only to women. Already met people who dragged it into the "feminine people" camp instead and people who dragged it into "feminine women" camp. I tend on the other hand to stick into the tried and tested too much so I find both irritating xD
I more had "only/exclusively" vs "mostly/usually" in mind. But yes. There is also the question of whether its about gender or sex; homo-hetero being viewed as "same-opposite" vs "same-different"; what you wanna do with them β¦ sex, relationship or both. Some think samesex intercourse is fine as long as you don't want a relationship . And what even does attraction mean.
I see it as different things, you can fall for one gender, you can feel sexual attractive for another but most of the time do they sync. So that made also sense why some had crushes on the gender they wouldn't be together with.
It all clicked when I got to know a girl who could fall in love with men and women but couldn't enjoy having sex with guys even tho she tried to really liked it with the guys she fell for. And that also made me understand what pan really was because I thought it was just bi with extra steps but when gender identity, gender romance and gender sexually was all different things then it all made sense.
I struggle to believe that anyone is 100.00% straight or gay. Like, really? You're straight, sure... But there's not one person? One situation? One perfect storm of circumstances where you'd try swinging the other way just a little bit?
100% gay here and so far it continues this way.
Trust me, it is very frustrating to be around people who you would gladly fuck your brains out, but your brain is like "eww".
Personally, there is not one person in the gender I'm not attracted to that even vaguely seems interesting that way.
Might as well be thinking of grasshoppers or something.
Why's that?
I don't think the human race would have survived 50/50 split
So bi and pan people don't fuck and make babies?
That would imply at least 30% is bi/pan.
And even at 80%, early humans already had it really rough. There seems to have been 2 near extinctions of modern humans in the far past, so when the population is about 1000, having 200 not contribute is pretty big. Especially with the higher mortality rates early humans had in regards to birth.
It's more likely the percentage started extremely low and increased over time as population stability increased, since then it would reach a point where 10-20% not having kids wouldn't be as big a deal since there would now be hundreds of thousands or even over a million.
Honestly it's weird how adamant people are there have always been people who solely preferred one sex over the other. While it's generally true for modern society, people wouldn't have even understood what you mean in ancient times by "sexual orientation", really. I mean you could obviously explain it and people could answer to a degree, but...
Well, think of this, we have left and right in our languages. We all know those are relative terms. My left and your left are different, most of the time. Anyway, there exists a tribe who don't have relative words for directions, and they only use cardinal directions, all the time. As in if they're hanging a painting, they'd say "no, no, a bit to the north" instead of "left". On a tangent, it makes them very much immune to getting lost as they have incredible sense of direction for that reason. My point being that to us it's simple that you just use left and right, why wouldn't you, when people know what it means and it's simple. So why doesn't that tribe use them? Idk, it's just not in their culture. Just like such strict classifications of sexual orientation weren't much of a thing in ancient and prehistoric times.
Bill And The Romans Talk About Sexuality | The Eaters Of Light | Doctor Who
Cornelius: Yeah, don't worry, Bill, Lucius will look after you.
Lucius: Shut up, Cornelius!
Bill: Ahh, Lucius, erm, right, listen there's, erm, something I should explain.
Lucius: What?
Bill: This is probably just a really difficult idea. I don't like men that way.
Lucius: What? Not ever?
Bill: Nah, not ever. Only women.
Nah...not ever.
Lucius: Oh. Alright, yeah, I've got it. You're like Vitus then.
Bill: What?
Lucius: He only likes men.
Vitus: Some men. Better looking men than you, Lucius.
Lucius: I don't think it's narrow-minded, I think it's fine. You know what you like.
Bill: And you like both?
Lucius: I'm just ordinary, I like men and women.
What the fuck am I watching?
Thanks, now i'm asexualΒ²
This doesn't help, I only have more questions now!
About your sexuality?
Well no.. but actually yes
Can't wait for the inevitable South Park episode about their love story.
Holy, i saw the pictures but now after seeing the video i wish i was born without eyes.
π¦π¦Raw Milkπ¦π¦ ποΈπποΈ
"I am so hetero."
Now I am straighter than ever...
~~Thank you.~~ π
There was a comedienne that stuck a line in my head " I'm attracted to men, but I don't find them attractive"
Similar.
Charlie Sheen said that he didn't pay women for sex. He paid them to have sex and then leave.
That actually kinda makes sense though. He was saying he didn't want a relationship, just the sex part. I'm sure Charlie Sheen would have no problem finding people to have sex with that didn't require payment, they would just expect a relationship as part of it.
As opposed to other dude, who just was gay and was trying to sound like he wasn't gay.
A comedienne is a lady comic. She is saying she wants men but doesn't find them attractive, which as a straight lady, makes absolute sense to me. Especially as I get older I wish I was bi, women age better (or more women age well is probably a better way to put it), and it would be easier in some ways. But alas, it's men for me.
One of the few funny 'Cathy' cartoons ever.
Cathy and Irving are talking and Irving asks Cathy what she wants in a man. He has to be a self-made millionaire; who is not materialistic. He has to love pets; he can't own any. He can't be afraid of commitment; he can't have any exes.
Irving goes off. He points out that what she wants is impossible.
Cathy asks Irving what he wants.
"A beautiful virgin who loves sex."
Another win for the blind and deaf people.
Do I really want to know?
Probably not.
I dunno, i thought the first 30 seconds of the 2 minute video on nyposts yt were good for a laugh
Whatever you are, everyone has preferences. I'd prefer to be younger and more attractive but I'd also prefer that in a partner even though I'm not that myself. I love the vibes of older people but not many older people have taken good care of their bodies. I get it, it is difficult.
Ngl, I grew up thinking I was gay, but...
Was it a magic trick all along?
There are a few gay men looking at this video.
That's it.