this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
356 points (99.4% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9391 readers
447 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Imagine how much money and energy we are wasting by gatekeeping so much stuff. I never realized how expensive it is to avoid collaboration until AI came along.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"While distillation is a legitimate way for companies to produce smaller, cheaper versions of their own frontier models, it's illegal for competitors to leverage it to acquire such capabilities from other AI companies at a fraction of the time and cost that would take them if they were to develop them on their own."

Is this actually illegal or just against their TOS lol

[–] errer@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s illegal because they’ll sue your ass into oblivion and force you to settle before the court can actually rule on the legality of it

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago

Sue China or its companies into oblivion? Good luck.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Was kinda confused at first about how Internet Protocol got mixed up in this

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Same. How could a machine steal its own IP address? It doesn't make sense!

[–] joker54@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can't copyright content not created by a human. Wouldn't this mean it's not IP, instead it's at most trade secrets?

Following that logic, if their trade secrets give themselves away, legally speaking, they are SOL

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How can it be a secret if they gave it away?

[–] joker54@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago

Exactly this.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If only Anthropic and other AI companies were even a little bit caring about the way they abusively scrape and pirate from websites of small creators that have no means to combat them, maybe I'd find it easier to sympathise.

As far as I see it, getting pirated themselves is just karma.

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Man your pfp just made me so nostalgic lmao.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

They train on my open source code without following the license, so throw them all in jail.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

How can something be illegal to do if they did it in another country?

Why are they so against progress? /s

That's tough, buddy.

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

lololololololol

I'm sorry. The sheer ingenuity and creativity here is astonishing.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Chatgpt, cry me a river