this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
580 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

19315 readers
2201 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 75 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Wish granted. Electrons, being a human construct, have now always been defined slightly differently. Just as Franklin got the polarity wrong and you still use his labeling system, J.J. Thompson will now have fundamentally misunderstood the nature of the electron, leading to a cascading assumption by later scientists that the number of electrons in a neutral atom is one greater than the number of protons. Even though this completely breaks the math of quantum mechanics, everyone is just used to subtracting one at this point. This is a minutely worse world, but as a bonus, every physicist who sees you will now be preternaturally certain that you are personally to blame. You're welcome."

[–] Juice@midwest.social 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It is way too common to confuse the abstractions we use to understand reality with reality itself. Like the scientists who work with this stuff are really consistent in keeping the two separated, but the moment a theory gets in the hands of a journalist or god forbid a politician, it starts wreaking havok

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're making the electrons gay!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Never met a gay electron. They're always so damn negative.

[–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is way too common to confuse the abstractions we use to understand reality with reality itself. Like the scientists who work with this stuff are really consistent in keeping the two separated

I wish this was true. I remember seeing a physicist talking about how the laws of physics are mathematical in nature and that the laws of physics needed to exist before the universe do the universe is made of math. I don't think the vast majority of physicists have a philosophical grounding for the types of ontological claims they make. Even less so since "shut up and calculate" became the professional axiom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 127 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Former situation: there is one electron

New situation: there are two electrons

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago

This is getting out of hand, now there are two of them!

[–] Rokin@leminal.space 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It also works for metaphysics. Reincarnation is real and there's only one soul, just bouncing around through all of time and space in an endless loop.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

heck yes! been looking for this for like ten years now

thanks for the share

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

There is also an animated version by Kurzgesagt

https://youtu.be/h6fcK_fRYaI

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

That was a great read. TIL. ✨

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

I always liked the idea that the genie rules, when they're presented, are not laws/rules so much as hard physical limits. You can't wish for more wishes because the genie just doesn't have that much power. They're powerful, but they're not God with a capital G. The genie tries to add a electron to every atom in the universe. If fails and collapses with exhaustion before it's even finished adding one extra electron to every atom in your body.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 77 points 4 days ago
[–] RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 56 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Genie is being lazy and interprets that as: Add one electron to the universe, and attach it to any of the atoms available.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's not Interpretation, that a whole different thing.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Add one extra electron to all the atoms in the universe -- adds one electron to all the atoms but not one each for each atom

Edit: typo,typo2

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Genie interprets as "every atom now shares this one extra electron"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can someone ELI5 what would happen?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (6 children)

You know how when you put magnet faces together with the same polarity, they push against each other. If you squeeze them together they will pop away. When an atom has an extra electron, it makes its charge more negative. If all of the atoms have extra electrons, all of their charges will be more negative. Now imagine every single atom in the universe was suddenly the same polarity and began pushing all other atoms away. I'll let your imagination take over from there.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

For some reason you just explained the probability of the big bang. Some idiot made a wish, and poof, new universe.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You've clearly never met a 5-year-old

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Extra electrons make atoms go 'splodey.

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When I was younger, I would often splodey too when thinking about Carmen electron

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh, I see. I read it wrong at first. I thought it was saying add one electron total, I didn't realize it meant one to each atom. It makes a lot more sense now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago

Ha! Tricks on you. There was only ever one electron in the universe anyway. Now they can split the work and get twice as much universe done.

[–] Zkuld@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

no need to go to such lengths, it's enough to add one singular extra electron anywhere to brick the whole universe

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

You’re always so negative …

Diabolical…..

[–] MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Barbaric.

Just make ionic bonds a little stickier for a minute.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

What if it’s one extra neutron? >.>

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Or make every living thing deeply aware of each of their atoms at all times

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›