progressives are the only ones doing their damned jobs.
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
130 points (99.2% liked)
News
36292 readers
3147 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
tax incomes more than $1 million
They'll just take out loans against stock and live off of that money. It doesn't count as income and is also not taxed as capital gains.
That's a huge loophole that needs closing.
Yup, need to tax leveraged assets.
Everyone who says "$1 million is not a lot of money" is an idiot who probably doesn't have $1 million themselves and never will.
It's not "retire and live a life of luxury" money, at least in many parts of the world.
It's a lot of money in terms of paying down debt and covering rent for a while, though.
A million dollars to someone or something that regularly generates tens to hundreds of millions, if not billions, every year is not a lot of money at all.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. But my understanding is that income taxes are illegal in WA so this would require a constitutional amendment. Is this that amendment? Or some law that's going to pass just to be struck down by the court and waste everyone's time?
The 1930 statute states that we can't have a "graduated tax on property". Since then, it has been accepted that income/money was part of that property definition. If that were the case, then any income tax would have to be a flat percentage for everyone. The state supreme court overturned that in 2023 when we instituted a state capital gains tax. Their new ruling is that a tax on the transaction of goods or capital does not constitute a tax on ownership of same. That means income is taxable at variable rates now.
I was wrong
So no more tax cuts for the rich but also nothing to help the working class? aka nothing has changed? I don't see that as very "progressive"
Upvoting because you simply admitted you were wrong. It's nice to see some human interaction once in a while.
Maybe I'm misreading your comment, but that's not what's happening here.
This is a new tax bill being proposed, that would add an additional tax on people with incomes over a million dollars, bringing in nearly 4 billion dollars every single year in additional income.
All they did here was remove a provision that would have ended a tax on businesses making over $250m/yr, which would make Washington lose $550m.
So...
no more tax cuts for the rich
Correct, at least the one tax cut that would have otherwise been in this bill.
nothing to help the working class?
Incorrect, this money would expand the Working Families Tax Credit (sales tax rebate for people with lower incomes), cut some additional sales taxes (which are regressive taxes) on hygiene products, in favor of this progressive income-based tax, and fund the public school system, healthcare services, and most other services Washington provides.
This is aimed at reducing, and hopefully eventually eliminating, the state's reliance on regressive taxes like sales taxes, in favor of progressive taxes, like this one, on high income earners.
aka nothing has changed?
This is an additional 9.9% tax on incomes over a million dollars that doesn't exist already. This is $3.7B that would not otherwise be spendable by the Washington government on public services, and it would help to close the budget deficit, which currently would require taking hundreds of millions of dollars from the state's rainy day fund.
I don’t see that as very “progressive”
So to wrap that up, what I'm saying here is this is billions of dollars going to public services, as well as removing some regressive parts of the tax system, while now not giving massive tax breaks to corporations.
If this bill doesn't pass or hadn't been introduced to begin with, Washington would have cut many public services, kept more regressive taxes, and lost much of its rainy day fund.
Well, happy to be wrong
quote i'm replying to was retracted
...nothing to help the working class? aka nothing has changed
Sorry for the snarky tone but you should probably read the article fully before making statements like this. There are a number of benefits to children and working class families from this change.
Democrats in the House committee also worked to put in a sales tax exemption for diapers and moved up a scheduled rollback of sales tax on technology services that the Senate had added.
Budget writers in both the House and Senate are counting on billions in revenue from the tax to cover the state’s operating expenses starting in 2029. Without the tax, the current supplemental budget plans included hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to child care subsidies over the next four years.
Last I read, doesn't WA currently have some of the more regressive taxes in the country?
we’re pretty close to being #1!
Yeah. There's no income tax, so it's sales tax and excise taxes all the way down.
Is it illegal or something to have property tax brackets? Why does every single state, county, and municipality apply a flat rate (excl. allowances)?
Article VII, Sec I of the state constitution says
"All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of property within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax..."
So taxes on things need to be uniform (so, like, 2.5% on ALL property or ALL Doritos).
The voters approved a bracketed state income tax back in the day, but a lawsuit from it basically said "income is property." So they could probably do a flat tax on income, but those are stupid.
But that same article also says "All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of property within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax..." and pure value doesn't constitute a different class.
That's basically what I remember backed up by two searches on Google, so sorry if I'm wrong.
The voters approved a bracketed state income tax back in the day, but a lawsuit from it basically said “income is property.”
The state supreme court overturned that ruling in 2023, though. Income is now considered a transaction of property, so an income tax is no longer a tax on the property itself, but the transaction thereof.
That's good to know! Maybe the legislature will overcome the aversion to an income tax and fix some regressive structures.
It might be a matter of language but "uniform" doesn't really convey "flat" IMO. I would take it to mean the authority couldn't say this building or subdivision has a different tax rate than the one next to it if they're in the same territory. That makes sense if you want to avoid governments using taxes as a way to punish a specific individual or business.
Can they do a flat tax with a non-flat rebate?
Great news, but, just status quo.
These same lawmakers started an asstroturfing campaign on social media, specifically Reddit subs of Seattle and Washington attempting to get people to more openly support the current plan by answering questions.
It backfired immediately as all the top replies are asking why it's not an across the board sales tax cut for everyone struggling? Why is it only tax exemptions for specific cases?
Another big question that they still refuse to answer is why not write the law so it won't eventually go lower or start impacting middle/low class in just a few years? These are very easy to write in and adjust for inflation/wage increases.
Democrat lawmakers are silent on purpose and the silence is deafening even for progressives.