this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
552 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39436 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tartarin@piefed.social 77 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Unless they can reproduce, I don't see the issue here.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While the medical concerns with incest don't apply here, the stigma of having sexual relations with a relative usually doesn't take such technicalities into account.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Why should the biological stigma matter when the only remaining stigma would have been social?

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Homophobia masked as incestphobia (not sure if real word...)

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Power dynamics, access/grooming to family members.

The issue isn't about reproduction, though neither of those would apply in this scenario where we assume they were estranged.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seems like none of those apply here though. These two didn't even know they were brothers until they were already together romantically.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I said that.

misread stigma as smegma

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what biological stigma is supposed to mean. Sexual relations between siblings gives most people the ick regardless of technicalities, and that is a social stigma, the only kind of stigma I'm aware of.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think that's all shit we are taught. In highschool there was a brother and sister in the grade above me that were notoriously very clingy with each other and their parents didn't let them take sex ed because that class needed parental sign off and the bible was the only teacher they needed or some stupid shit. Anyway they were seen fucking in the storage room when extra chairs were needed for an event. People just passed it off as twins stuff before, then after it was twins stuff

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, these are social norms, and those are taught.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Biological stigma" would refer to the effects of having an incestuous child.

"Social stigma" would refer to the sexual relationship between people in a close familial relationship, which is clearly not the case since they had no prior relationship.

Since these men wouldn't fall under either category, what other stigma is there?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think we're using the same definition of stigma.

Stigma is a profound, unfair negative belief or stereotype attached to a person or group, causing shame, social rejection, and discrimination.

I'm having a hard time making any of the stuff you're saying make sense with that definition, and the whole word is inherently social.

The fact is that a lot of people think it's nasty to fuck your brother, and that you should stop fucking him when you realize you're related to him. I see the nuance in this situation, but a lot of people don't, and if they maintain the relationship they will have to deal with those people. It's already hard enough to deal with homophobia without this on top.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Would be still legal in Germany

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 15 points 1 month ago

No inbreeding, no problem

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The issue is the fact they are brothers is on the front page of the newspaper. Hope that helps

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you mean that the issue is the fact that they're brothers or that it's been printed in a newspaper with their faces on? Because if they're two consenting adults, they cannot reproduce with one another, and they didn't grow up as siblings, then I too am struggling to see what the issue is, considering that the usual incest-related issues (inbreeding and consent/coercion issues born of familial bonds/hierarchies) are addressed. Seems the only remaining issue is that it's been publicized, meaning they're liable to get shit on by the people for the rest of their lives for something they weren't aware of, had no control over, and hurts no one.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Seems the only remaining issue is that it's been publicized, meaning they're liable to get shit on by the people for the rest of their lives

That's what I was saying yes

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

On the plus side, you cannot get someone pregnant from buttseks. No matter how hard I tried.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can if you try hard enough, but then there are other complications

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Good thing those aren't anything like hemorrhoids

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Super irresponsible of them. Their butt babies are going to be deformed.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 22 points 1 month ago
[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 8 points 1 month ago

I hope they used protection.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

And so what

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

From what I can tell it's less of a shock if they like or play hockey. /s

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Random question for the bi fellas here:

Does gay porn online also have a high percentage of "step" family incestuous stuff? Or is that an exclusively straights problem.

[–] chewables@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It sure does. Step-dads, step-brothers and even step-uncles, as far as the eye can see

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why though?! Who clicks those videos?!

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The most frequent porn watchers don't fantasize about meeting new people to have sex with, they fantasize about having sex with someone that's already nearby so they don't have to go anywhere or do anything.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I feel seen. But like, the furry/fursona version. If I catch desires for them, and they commission a lot of art... woof.

Also like, randoms usually don't want to dive straight into kinks like being facefucked in public or written on, put in chastity, and came on before going to dinner. Whereas someone you already have a relationship with is (typically, ime...) much more open to those kinds of ideas. When I'm horny, the least amount of resistance between ravaging someone gagged and begging, the better.

[–] Signtist@fedinsfw.app 4 points 1 month ago

As someone who frequents those types of videos, I have the same revulsion to my own family that I imagine everyone else does. My fetish is more the taboo of it. I love when people who shouldn't have sex do it anyway. College professor with their student? Yes please. Nun with a confessor? Sign me up.

My wife often joins me in watching these videos, and has introduced me to a few genres of her own. You have a lot more fun when you accept the interests of others, as well as your own.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That makes sense. I don't like it, but I see the logic.

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not straight or bi, but furry, and furry porn has none of that stuff (well, I'm sure it exists if you go looking for it, but it's not like, plastered everywhere).

It's weird hearing about the totally different norms of human porn!

-- Frost

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It definitely exists, but it's rather rare. In the last few years it has expanded; actually today I saw some of it on FA by an artist I watch, and didn't know they drew that. Seems to be mostly father/son, but that might be skewed since I'm gay and follow many accounts that cater to that. Clones too, decent bit and seems to be growing, though slower.

E: cool pfp :3

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

re E: thanks!! *wags* My headmate Ylfingr drew it in Inkscape. :3

-- Frost

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›