this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
451 points (98.3% liked)

Risa

6844 readers
6 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 80 points 8 months ago (5 children)

This guy wiped out an entire race with a thought and your plan is to do what exactly?

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Me personally? I’m going to back away slowly without giving him my name.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 31 points 8 months ago

It's like that scene in "The Dark Knight"

Lucius Fox : Let me get this straight, you think that your client, one of the wealthiest and most powerful men in the world, is secretly a vigilante, who spends his nights beating criminals to a pulp with his bare hands, and your plan is to blackmail this person?

[Reese's face falls and Fox smiles]

Lucius Fox : Good luck.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

With a thought, because he was pissed off, and Wesley's big brain idea is to fuck with him. Picard had the wisdom to shrug and go "whatcha gonna do?"

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure Picard could get a hold of Q and make a deal.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Q would have said,

"Oh the Husnock? Horrible, simply horrible species. Good riddance. Did you ask me here to give Uxbridge a medal or something? Because he certainly doesn't deserve it! Why I've already genocided three species this morning and didn't even get a thank you."

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago (3 children)

That guy put himself in solitary confinement, forever. What could the feddies do to him that is more fitting?

[–] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 8 months ago

Cruel and unusual much?

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pipe in an endless loop of "Baby Shark" and Justin Bieber?

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Taylor Swift. I've got that "wildest dreams" one stuck in my head. It's an anxiety thing.

[–] sirblastalot@ttrpg.network 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is it really confinement if you can leave of your own volition?

Also, hang him.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, let's put a noose around the neck of someone who is essentially a god.

[–] sirblastalot@ttrpg.network 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What's he gonna do about it? Besides, Picard already bosses around a god all the time.

If you really are too scared, we can make Sisko do it.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Sisko would probably have a fit.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 55 points 8 months ago

I mean, I sort of imagine it to be less the "rule on the books" part, and more the "do we actually have the physical capacity to enforce those rules" end of it. They cant really imprison him (I mean while he's feeling guilty he might stay willingly, but they cant keep him in if he eventually changes his mind, so itd more be him imprisoning himself). Trying to despite the futility of it would seem somewhat dangerous, because again, if he should ever change his mind, you clearly dont want to seem hostile to something with that kind of power, especially when you dont have it. Saying "Our law is not sufficient for you" could just be interpreted as the most diplomatic way given his mental state to justify leaving and not returning.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 44 points 8 months ago (3 children)

To be fair Janeway wasn't around at the time, so they didn't have any examples of genocide to go off of.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Didn't Sisko wipe out a whole planet because fuck you Eddington?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He just made it uninhabitable by humans. Not exactly the same as wiping it out, but since it forced displacement of a whole planet, it was genocide.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think genocide requires death

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It doesn’t, according to the actual definition.

[–] Metz@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I would love to see the source for that. e.g. Oxford Languages says

the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The dictionary isn't a legal framework or international organization. The UN has a convention on genocide:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Item (c) comes the closest to what Sisko did, but he did it in a way that gave them a chance to get out, so it's not a perfect match. Forcing conditions for removing a group probably wouldn't qualify under any of these. That said, it can be a factor in Ethnic Cleansing, but the Maquis aren't really an ethnic group.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Good to know

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Phlox, Janeway, Sisko

Damn. Lots of genocide from the good guys.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Why not Phlox?

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If the Federation was in the business of putting higher beings on trial, don't you think the second they learned Q was human they'd slap him in a courtroom so fast it'd make his head spin?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Hold up. Q is human??

Fuck me. That's big spoilers. When am I gonna find this out?

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Later on we find out he was just 2 Q kids in a trenchcoat pretending to be human

[–] HeapOfDogs@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I summon thee, @Stamets to do your duty

[–] OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago

Q was turned into a human by other Q. It lasted for an episode

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

He is in one episode.

[–] WhereGrapesMayRule@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Shut up, Wesley! We must be circumspect with those who could visit genocide upon US with a thought. Also, don't bring up how often I challenged Q when he could have done the same or I'll just tell you to shut up again.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

COMPUTER TURN OFF THAT NOISE

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Genocide requires intent. Whereas this alien just had a fleeting moment of anger at the time of his wife being murdered.

Can he really be tried for genocide? It's hard to say, but I'd say not. We all have dark intrusive thoughts, and in this instance it had disastrous consequences.

It's all moot anyway. If you have no means or intention to enforce a law, does it really exist?

[–] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 7 points 8 months ago

Second degree species slaughter

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Ah, a heated gaming moment. We've all been there.

[–] Samy@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's why manslaughter is different than murder

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Genocide requires intent.

Is that actually, legally, true?

In other words, does the word identify the cause, or the effect?

Can he really be tried for genocide? It’s hard to say, but I’d say not.

How so? The facts seem self-evident.

It’s all moot anyway. If you have no means or intention to enforce a law, does it really exist?

You can still classify someone though in such a way, in hopes that in some future time you can enforce the law on them, having being previously judged as a criminal.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 points 8 months ago

Yes, genocide is intentional, it's in the definition.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Genocide does require intent, yes.

[–] JAM@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The heat-of-passion is something to argue to mitigate culpability. Yes, he killed an entire species, and wasn't exactly justified, but his emotions and passions were inflamed by the aliens murdering his wife making his actions involuntary.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah but we aren't talking heat-of-the-moment shoving someone into traffic during a bar fight, we're talking heat-of-the-moment naughty thought during an aerial bombardment from a hostile force where his wife was killed.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Genocide is systematic.

This was instantaneous.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

Yea, but genocide is like way to much paperwork