249
Learn.Microsoft.com is going to be pissed.
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
249 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
7111 readers
672 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In fact, most of the time I run into this it’s big corps who should know better, but don’t.
They won’t delist LinkedIn and Microsoft and Reddit. They just paid billions for Reddit content feeds.
So is SFGate. I can't even bother with their bullshit articles anymore. You have to click back 3 TIMES just to get out.
Google actually doing something good for once?
Oh, right. Not being able to press back prevents you going back to google.
Why would a browser give a site the ability to do this in the first place?
There’s quite a few reasons why having the ability to change the history of a particular browser session can be helpful. The major one is handling user flow in single page applications where the browser doesn’t see page changes but the application does so you add history despite a new page not being completely rendered. Thus it gives the illusion of moving pages and changing URLs without burdening the browser with the action. It’s a pretty integral feature and there are plenty of sites that make it malicious.
That's asinine. The outcome of browsers giving incompetent web designers enough access to muddy the function of users' back buttons was predictable from the start.
If only they would obliterate Facebook then! Facebook is notorious for doing this when getting to forum posts from google and I'm trying to go back to google, and it it pisses me off.
lol, I'll believe it when I see it. Something tells me that there's gonna be a list of "approved" websites, that also just so happen to increase their adsense buys around the same time....
I wish that the back button would send me back to the page + page position that I was on when I (the user) clicked a link or entered a form. I've never had a desire to revisit automatic redirect pages, so imo default behaviour should be to send the user back to the point of the previous user action. To me this seems easy and logical to implement, but I've never seen it, so maybe I'm missing something and it's not that easy.
That sounds like default behaviour, at least in Firefox, if a websites loaded as a static page and doesn't dynamically load its content after page load.
Since they mentioned redirect, I think they take an issue with the scenario of ‘click → more pages load and redirect you after each load → back’ that will repeatedly land you on just the last redirect page and then promptly redirect you forward to the newest page you tried to go back from
If it's default behaviour for static pages, but not for dynamic pages, then it's not much of a default. As a user I want ui actions to be consistent, the unknown stuff that happens in the background shouldn't change the behaviour of the ui. Firefox now mostly gets around this issue by opening search engine links in new tabs (I can't recall if that's standard for Firefox or if I had to change settings, but I've been using it for years like that), but this wouldn't have been needed if using the back button was reliable.
I found this 2022-2024 discussion with a few examples of the back button not working as expected: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-needs-to-do-something-about-back-button-history-loading/td-p/4678
I found no announcements of a fix. I also haven't had much occasion of noticing a fix, since new pages open in a separate tab for me.
Except Facebook right?
So is google banning single page applications or just the malicious behavior described? Hate when their announcements are so cryptic
Single page application should be blocked. Give me real links.
As long as it pretends that it has multiple pages, I don't see the harm. Not re-fetching and re-rendering navigation elements is a good thing, and you don't have to break the back button, address bar, and so on to do it.
Honestly, there should probably be a standard HTML attribute that tells the browser that internal links will always send this element in the same way and it should not be re-rendered.
It's called "frames" and we've had them for years. I feel like there's a meme template that would fit this...
Frames absolutely obliterate the back button and address bar, though.
Tldr?
Pressing the back button must take you back to the previous page you were on or else google will lower your page rating.
It's a rather short article...
(N)TL;DR: back should mean back. Sites that continue to make back do something else will get lower rankings in search results, which means reduced traffic and revenue.
Google has users still? Less tech savvy people have been hijacked by Bing, more techavvy people have bailed years ago. Right?
The least tech-savvy people don't use Windows, but Android or iOS, where Bing isn't the default search engine. (Slightly more tech-savvy ones may also use Chrome on Windows.)
As a tech-savvy person I still use Google a lot because DDG just doesn't give equally good results much of the time. There are many web pages that are indexed by Google, but not DDG.
I highly recommend kagi if you can justify the cost. It is genuinely how Google used to be in terms of search quality.
Thanks for the tip, currently I usually get what I want from DDG and Google (almost never use any others), but if I ever become dissatisfied I might try it.
Google has 89% of the web search marketshare according to statcounter
Why am I suddenly seeing hexbear here
Wdym "suddenly"? Checking my user profile on hexbear it appears that my posts to lemmy.zip communities have been federating there for a long time. Your instance doesn't seem to defederate them, don't know if it ever did; mine certainly doesn't and I don't remember a time when it ever did.