Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
Well those would have gone on my bucket list, but then towards the end, as I was searching for them to name the chemical responsible;
He and his team are still trying to identify the chemical compound responsible for the hallucinations in L. asiatica. Current tests suggest it is not likely related to any other known psychedelic compound. For one, the trips it produces are unusually long, commonly lasting one to three days after an onset of 12 to 24 hours, and in some cases even causing hospital stays of up to a week. Because of the extraordinarily long duration of these trips and the chance for prolonged side effects such as delirium and dizziness, Domnauer has yet to try the raw mushrooms himself.
A few days to a week? I'm very much reconsidering.
80% of the neurons in your brain are in your cerebellum
~~Pluto is smaller than Russia~~
Edit: this fact seems to rely on a contested measurement for pluto. I guess it would still be true if we look at volume but that's kinda weird.
What
Edit : apparently, counting surface areas, it's wrong, but by surprisingly little
Maybe the factoid first became popular when the USSR existed
I see 17 million sq km for Russia, and 16 million sq km for Pluto.
Idk I saw something like 17.1 for Russia and 17.4 for Pluto
Yeah it seems that Pluto got bigger since I learned this fact, and AI summary is also out dated
Edit to add: I hope it's obvious I meant our estimate of the surface area of Pluto increased, not that I think Pluto is growing.
Out of curiosity, if they had Ukraine–would they then surpass it?
98.62% of the uranium-235 in the Little Boy bomb was blown apart before fission. That leaves 1.38% that actually fissioned. That was 0.7 grams of U-235, about the size of a bb and the weight of a butterfly that destroyed Hiroshima.
Shows you how much energy is required to be matter
That is wild. I can not imagine how devastating the nukes of today are in comparison.
Quantum mechanics
A. Spooky action at a distance
B. Schrodinger’s cat
C. God does play dice
D. One of the most well tested theories in science
E. Is the underpinning for semi-conductors and lasers
The people who deny reality exists ("Schrodinger’s cat") do so specifically because they want to preserve locality (no "Spooky action at a distance"), because Bell proved in 1964 that physical reality is not compatible with locality. If you accept that reality is not local ("Spooky action at a distance") then there is no reason to deny realism ("Schrodinger's cat").