this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
216 points (97.0% liked)

politics

29444 readers
2451 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The world’s No. 1 bro-caster, who has expressed some buyer’s remorse over his endorsement of Trump, stood directly behind the president, who was seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office signing an executive order to ease restrictions on medical research and treatments using psychedelic drugs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 2 hours ago

Well at least we can all pop some shrooms and trip balls as the world ends.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

Kind of ironic that the multi-decade war on drugs that included things like MDMA, psilocybin, LSD were being done by the cons, as a way to "own the libs":

https://eji.org/news/nixon-war-on-drugs-designed-to-criminalize-black-people/

The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.

The Republican Party has always been full of Republicans.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You can kind of see this as a general win for anybody who is a fan of using psychedelics for treatment of mental health issues, but it's important to point out that both of the people mentioned in the headline have ulterior motives for this move.

Trump wants to get Joe Rogan back on his side after he alienated him with his Iran antics. Joe Rogan is one of the biggest conservative megaphones in the nation and he can't afford to have him be talking shit about MAGA before the midterms, so he'll throw him a bone about this one issue that he doesn't give a fuck about anyway.

Joe Rogan is doing this to be able to hopefully one day self-administer psychedelics, not get meaningful treatment or aid from a professional to guide him through the process and change himself for the better.

I'm not sure which of these two are being more selfish at this point.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, it's an EO, too, so can be overturned on a whim, so it might be hard to make any long-term research/business plans based on just an EO, especially from this dumpster fire of a "president".

The Democrats should make it priority #1 to reverse and pave over everything with the taint of donnie on it, but in some cases I fear they may overcorrect, and I hope this is not one of them.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago

Remember way back like 1 week ago when there was an article saying JoE RoGan TuRnS on MaGa. Fuck that. Once a fascist, always a fascist. Just stop paying attention to him.

[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

took me a few reads to realise the headline wasn't saying he was tripping while signing it

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 117 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I can't wait for the day when we no longer have to hear about these two.

[–] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Whenever Rogan has a guest on that I think will surely push back on what Rogan is and has been doing in regards to Trump, I watch it just to see if they will say anything. And I'm disappointed every time. I thought for sure, when I saw Bill Murray was on with Joe Rogan, I thought for sure that Bill Murray was gonna push back, and he didn't at all. I naively thought that someone like Bill Murray might be able to get Rogan to see reason.

And then recently David Cross was on Rogan's show, and David Cross is really funny, and I like him. He's super political and he didn't push back at all. Not even a little bit, it was like, what's happening!? I mean, I don't want to give David Cross a hard time about it, but it's like, why did you go on his show? And then not even say anything about how Rogan has conducted himself with Trump.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I mean, I don’t want to give David Cross a hard time about it, but it’s like, why did you go on his show?

Probably for the exposure to further his career. Disappointing but he may not actually care about what he says he does.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry the media will still report every time they show their faces or say something stupid

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Can’t show your face after your dead.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Rogan told reporters he learned about the medical benefits of psychedelics from an interview on his podcast with W. Bryan Hubbard, the CEO of the nonprofit Americans for Ibogaine — who stood next to Rogan in the Oval Office — and former Energy Secretary Rick Perry.

The fuck? Who let Rick “and the third thing i can’t remember” Perry in there??

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 47 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Joe Rogan did help to get this guy elected. I hope that is remembered during Nuremberg 2.0

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If we've built a society where Joe Rogan has political influence then that's our fault more than it is his

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Propagandist have always existed and in Nuremberg, they were executed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Joe Rogaine is proof that no matter how much money you have, you can't buy a full head of hair

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

Perhaps with this easing of restrictions on psychedelics they’ll find some new combination of shrooms, horse dewormer, bleach, and toilet seat coke that will bring it back. At a minimum that combo will have you thinking your hair is back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 43 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is only an executive order. We know those are meaningless. I’m curious if there will actually be research on something that could go back to being illegal at any time.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 22 points 20 hours ago

It might be meaningless legally but we've also learned that the various 3 letter agencies just do whatever the fuck he says anyway.

[–] Vegan_Joe@piefed.world 60 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

This, and accidentally legalizing hemp weed are possibly the only positive things to come out of this whole debacle

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This and reducing marijuana to Schedule III are two popular policies that Democrats are fucking stupid for passing up. If Democrats ever regain power, I do hope this might motivate the party to fully legalize marijuana, psychedelics, and other low-risk drugs like amphetamines.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

If Democrats rescheduled marijuana, they wouldn't be able to use the issue to win future elections. I love how Biden waited until last minute to demand the rescheduling of marijuana. If he had done it any sooner, his attempt might have been successful.

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 21 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

no one tell him about November

https://wakenbakery.net/november-2026-hemp-ban-thc-products/

In November 2025, Congress passed H.R. 5371, which rewrites the federal definition of hemp to use total THC instead of just delta-9. This means THCA — which converts to delta-9 when heated — now counts toward the legal threshold. The law also caps finished products at just 0.4mg total THC per container, which would make even a single 5mg gummy illegal.

What Products Are Affected?

  • THCA flower — Raw hemp flower that converts to THC when smoked or vaped. Sales have surged 340% since 2024.
  • Delta-8 and delta-10 THC products — The gas station gummies and vapes that exploded in popularity.
  • Hemp-derived delta-9 gummies and edibles — The legal edibles sold at cannabis cafes and online.
  • HHC products — Synthesized from hemp-derived CBD.
  • THC beverages — Infused seltzers, coffees, and lemonades.
[–] Vegan_Joe@piefed.world 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Fuck.

I'm reminded of that early South Park episode where Chef explains that the best way to make a baby cry is to first give it candy.

Then, once the baby is happy, only then do you take it away.

The best way to hurt people is to lift them up first, so the fall back down hurts twice as much...

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 6 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, I'm sick of it too, I'm a regular THC user and this round, I may bite the bullet and quit entirely. Fuck this entire country.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago

He also ended NAFTA, which was a good move for Mexican proletariat

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yea, but doesn't go into effect until November. THCA flower is already banned, but edibles and THCA carts are still legal until then. I'm keeping hope that something will happen before though.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 21 points 20 hours ago

But the same clown killed the NIH....so now we can legally not research anything.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

I was planning on doing some independent research on my day off anyway.

[–] resolute_clover@sh.itjust.works 10 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Trump needs to take some psychedelics.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Psychedelics doesn't magically make a bad person into a good person, just look at Joe Rogan. Though I am all for putting the entire admin deep into a k-hole that they will never escape from

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You dont think hes been part of a thing at some point where they take the pineal gland out of a living person?....

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

There is only one cure for lead deficiency. Leading more effectively, ahem.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 20 hours ago

Honestly psychedelics turned my opinion on living around when I was younger and I was just messing around recklessly with them (I mean, Not too recklessly, safe tested doses and that, but I’m not a doctor!)

I do not doubt it could be helpful or useful ina therapeutic setting, especially when administered by people who know what they’re doing.

But we all know Trump is doing this to win back Rogan, who he needs to keep the roid bros in line

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The president also joked about getting ibogaine for himself as he pointed to a study that found that people who took the drug experienced a massive reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety within a month.

“Can I have some, please? I’ll take some,” he said. “I don’t have time to be depressed. You know, you stay busy enough, maybe that works too. That’s what I do.”

Anybody seen my violin?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't believe for a second that he suffers from depression or anxiety. He's a carrier - he induces it in others.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

It can be both

load more comments
view more: next ›