this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
19 points (91.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47797 readers
1125 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are wealthy Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc. families that have been multimillionaires for a few generations (maybe even billionaires), but my question is: how did these Black and other families of color maintain their wealth through racist times?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mech@feddit.org 33 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Racist ideology is a tool used by the rich to divide the poor.
If you're rich enough, you're "one of the good ones".

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

Racist ideology is a tool used by the rich to divide the poor

I don't think this is true most of the time.

In the case of black people in america though, we see that most of the hate towards them is via ideas of them being criminals or poor and lazy. If you're rich, you circumvent all three of these things. (Because rich people apparently can't be criminals heh) Whoopee!

I think rich people generally don't start shit with their neighbours or social circle, rather if they do it's more like passive aggresive shit that all neighbours are made to suffer equally. So that might be part of it.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 14 hours ago

Money can be a great whitewasher.

Also you have the means to easily move out of a country and into a more pleasant clime

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Racism is largely a tool BY the wealthy elite to divide the poorer class. If you are in the elite, you don't participate in it.

[–] trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 16 hours ago

I mean, you are technically still benefiting from the racist systems set up by the elite even if you are working class, so you're still technically (unwittingly) participating in it. But you can (and should) still do your best to not actively advance the system.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I would say they participate in it the most, since it helps maintain their gluttony.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Black people of wealth maintain that wealth by exploiting labor.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

So do whites, what's the point?

[–] yellerbadger@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

This is a super broad topic and is going to vary a lot by who the exploited and exploiters were and what type of society was present. I'm going to stick to Africa and the US white/black relations because that's what I am the most read up on though I am nowhere near a historian.

Generally, POC got to keep their wealth or amass it if they were performed some sort of function for whites or were not perceived as a threat which would invite confiscation. Sometimes Europeans were not interested in settling a territory but were interested in extracting capital from that territory. In such cases, Europeans would rely on a few natives to do their bidding and those natives may have even had some administrative role. Think the Dahomey raiders of Benin, the Tutsi of Rwanda, Americo-Liberians (although technically not natives). There were those like the Ethiopians who resisted conquest and colonization altogether but I don't know much about them.

When Europeans settled/colonized a land and thus extracted resources and administered that land themselves, IMO those POC's best bet to maintain wealth was to not draw white ire. In the US, black people tended to do okay in DC as there was some access to well paying federal jobs and for the most part the federal government prevented race riots in the capital city. To this day, the DC and broader DC/Maryland/Virginia area tends to hold more successful black people. There were some black enclaves in Wilmington, NC ("The place for black opportunity"); Tulsa, OK(Black Wall Street); Atlanta (Sweet Auburn) and elsewhere where black people were well off financially. They made money through commerce with other black people until that white ire befell them. The Wilmington and Tulsa Riots destroyed those black communities. Atlanta had a race riot as well though successful black communities persist there.

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Segregation actually helped with that. While most communities were exploited and failed, some took off.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 14 hours ago

Tulsa and Wilmington are two examples of reactions to black people starting to build themselves up, as per the American Dream.

And as an NC grade school student, do you think Wilmington was mentioned at all in any history class? But we learned all the governor names...

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Why would you assume they wouldn't?

[–] communism@lemmy.ml -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You know that there are countries where the majority of people are Black (ie all of Africa...), or majority of people are Asian (ie all of Asia...), or majority of people are Hispanic (ie LatAm... not to mention that "Hispanic" is not a racial category in LatAm—there are white settlers, indigenous people, Black people, etc in LatAm too), right? You know that non-white countries also colonise and plunder, and may have colonial wealth from that (eg Japan)? You know that inequality and class exist in these countries and some families will be wealthy for the same reason that families are wealthy in majority-white countries? And you know that white supremacy is not the only racist system in the world—in a place where Hindu nationalism is the order of the day, for example, being a brown Hindu is not going to cause you disadvantages in society.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Old money" vs. "New money" is a particularly American concept, though.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 0 points 14 hours ago

I don't think I'm familiar with the term. If it just means inherited wealth, though, I'm afraid that's a thing everywhere there's private property.