this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
383 points (99.2% liked)

Climate

8570 readers
740 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago

I'll be honest, I don't really care. None of these laws mean anything if the government is completely rebuilt from the ground up. Every single thing this admin does will be worth so much burned toilet paper. All the grifts ill gotten gains will be liquidated and confiscated by whoever the fuck hangs them all in the streets, as is most likely to happen. All the bills that say shit like "no regulations on AI evar!! Lol" or "Donald Trumps name on everything, including mt Kilimanjaro for some reason" will be meaningless.

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 1 points 29 minutes ago
[–] ZpbkPEcaHhIveqdR@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

You sound as if you think the democrats are a progressive party

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

They framed it as a way to “protect American energy from leftist legal crusades punishing lawful activity.”

Aren't lawful actions already protected by, you know, the law? By definition, the only legal punishments that could happen are for illegal actions. This doesn't even make the slightest bit of sense as reasoning. They didn't even try to manufacture justification.

Anyway, when the justice system no longer can be relied on to provide justice, extra-legal methods must be taken to ensure a just society. Them doing this could be either of two things, or both. It's them actually protecting dirty energy companies, as it sounds, or it's them requiring vigilantism to stop it, which gives them justification to crack down on "the left" and anyone else who stands against them.

Edit: Also, they consistently say that climate change isn't real, and yet they feel the need to pass a law that explicitly is there to protect against the harms of climate change. Either it's real, and they should pay (especially since they knew about it and mislead the public, which this also explicitly protects), or it isn't real, and this law is pointless.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

the actual way to solve “leftist legal crusades” (if they exist): anti-SLAPP laws that punish frivolous lawsuits… but that would hurt them more than “leftists”

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 4 hours ago

aside from like only 2 dems in congress, almost every other one is complicit.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 4 hours ago

You mean progressives? Because Dems as a party are not against carbon

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

They will express greatly concerning concerns, and send a moderately worded letter.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Do they realize that this will lead to more physical sabotage against oil infrastructure? If they get rid of any non-violent means of mitigating concerns, they leave only one option.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

After what the americans have mustered against a fascist takeover I don't think the rich are very scared about someone trying to "sabotage" the oil infrastructure...

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Right wing violence (which includes neo Nazis, fundamentalist Christians bombing abortion clinics, etc) and fundamentalist Islam attacks make up the overwhelming majority of political violence in the USA but left wing violence exists. And of that left wing violence the majority is what they call “ecoterrorism”

It’s not obscenely common (tbf no political violence is “extremely common” in America, statistically still very unlikely) but it does happen. It’s just far less publicized because “some people bombed an oil transport line/hummer dealership at night/etc” is not nearly as clickbaity as “weird scumbag with a manifesto about great replacement theory posted to 8chan shot 35 people”

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes they can barely keep the regime in place with the violent revolutionary clashes going on every day.
The US land of the free guerilla makes Hamas look like boy scouts.

[–] fira@lemmy.today 17 points 12 hours ago

Another unpopular move by the party of pedophile supporters

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 24 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Frankly? The United States is not a two parties country. It’s a no party country. Ever thought about why monopoly laws from the eighties no longer exist?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 4 hours ago

There is a communist party. And a green party. And like 10 more, depending where you live.

The problem is not that there are not progressive parties. The problem is that the US is not a democracy, and it's designed so only one party can win elections

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 13 hours ago

Reagan was an antichrist, yes

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They should be making people aware of this, but those stupid laws can be repealed just as easy as they are made.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

Such a shame your media is bought up by the wealthy!

But who will repeal them and why would they?

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

They never do.
Either they don't try or they are powerless and blocked in some way.
Suckers fall for it every time.

[–] ActualGrapesTasteGreen@piefed.zip 28 points 15 hours ago

Oil burns a little too readily for them to be taking non-violent options off the table. A paper warehouse is nothing compared to this potential.

[–] core@leminal.space 63 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

If they remove our legal recourse, do they think we'll just shrug and be like "guess we have no options"?

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

yes, americans are weak and subservient.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 41 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That seems to be exactly what Americans are doing right now about everything. So yeah.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

You’re right. No one is throwing molotovs at techbro houses or burning down warehouses or anything.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Makes it easy to call us all "terrorists" before they drug us and send us to "wellness farms"

[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That’s exactly why you all need to stop acting like sheeple and start a revolution.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 13 hours ago

I mean you're preaching to the choir but the seething mass of liberals don't even know what liberal means

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 70 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Why? Most democratic officials are closeted republicans.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

This isn't really true, though some are. It's just that both Democrats and Republicans are almost all owned by the owner class, so support any corporate protections. That isn't anything that Republicans own. It's both parties.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

and funded by big oil, gillibrand is the most blatant one, she even received an "award from them.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Right. How else is Jeffries and Chuck going to afford their beach front property in Gaza if they don't receive million from the fossil fuel lobby.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

they just ask aipac for more dollars, which is basically us tax money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Conservatives. The comic book villains that came to life and terrorize an entire planet.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

clearly the only option is killing all of the politicians

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

You are now moderator of: HexBear

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Congratulations, you have made The List.

[–] Steve 24 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

Democrats aren't saying anything because on the real issues that effect everyone (economics) the two parties are almost perfectly aligned.
Have been since Clinton won.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

When will people realize that these are actual enemies to our country and are KILLING US

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

After a handful of perfectly preventable climate disasters if we had acted with force 10 years ago, people will suddenly go "how could God do this to us!! Why couldn't da gubament have done anything to protect us!!"

Fucking idiots. I hate these people with a cold passion.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

100%.

No other nation/individual/extremist group/ideology on this planet could be causing America more harm than the Republican party. They are oppressive. They strip rights. They flagrantly violate the Constitution. They crush the middle and lower classes.

They are absolutely America's enemy and the enemy of Democracy in general.

load more comments
view more: next ›