this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
770 points (99.9% liked)

Science Memes

19992 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 24 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

While not specifically science, my engineering department on board ship started slapping Mechanicus purity seals on our equipment to keep it working.

[–] Warm_Bowl_of_Peas@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Are you an Ork from Warhammer 40k? LMAO

[–] LonelySea@reddthat.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Sounds about right for engineering nerds. I was a deckie and y'all were basically wizards as far as I was concerned

[–] QueenMidna@lemmy.ca 24 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

While not specifically science, my engineering department on board ship started slapping Mechanicus purity seals on our equipment to ~~keep it working~~ appease the machine spirit.

FIFY

[–] Jayve@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

Praise the Omnissiah.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 14 hours ago

The supervisor actually killed them, plot twist

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 39 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

microbiologists would do live sacrifices of animals if they even suspected it improves success rate

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Several billion mice would like to tell you a secret

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There's a computer working on it right now. Let's hope it doesn't get destroyed for some dumb reason before it is done.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm feeling pretty shitty that they demolished my house to build a fucking bypass

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

The Secret of NIMH?

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 21 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

and then some bozo says that biology is just complicated chemistry and chemistry is just complicated physics and we can simulate physics

curious thing is that i never hear biologists or chemists saying that, only some physicists and techbros. just trying to simulate your way out of small organic chemistry problems will make you even more hopelessly lost than you were before

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago

As a (micro)biologist, I totally support that notion. Biology is, indeed, chemistry, which is in turn physics, which is in turn mathematics.

The problem is, good freaking luck simulating biological processes on a physical level. We do biology and not physics, because it's a reasonable shortcut we have to make to work on what's important without waiting another millenia for a decent enough physical simulation.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why I'm a geographer. We know what we are.

I get to gleefully embrace my role as generalist who fanboys over real science.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What is a geographer? Seems like a super broad category. Are you a cartographer? Surveyor? Or do you just like, talk about mountains and the shape of the coast line?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

That's the thing: we do a bit of everything. I work in the development department for a very small city with a LOT of complicated development. We have a dozen employees for the wholencity, so having a wide skillset is necessary as I wear a lot of hats.

I am the GIS department, half the Planning department, lanning, and code enforcement. I analyze stormwater discharge, review rainwater harvesting water treatment plans, Dark Sky compliance, and other plan review I'm needed for.

If I have to get too deep into complicated engineering, construction code, or legal issues, I coordinate all third-party review services. I also handle any interlocal development-related issues (county and state compliance and water, fire, and school district).

I also act as the recording secretary for most public meetings, handle non-police Open Records, and run the city website.

I'm always stressed and super busy, but I'm also someone who thrives on spinning plates and chasing squirrels versus being bored doing the same thing day to day.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the relation between those isn't wrong but like... we can't simulate complicated physics. At least not at any reasonable speed.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

some people would tell you that we can simulate small bits of chemistry but it's flat out wrong (i might be biased as i've wrangled for a year with computational chemists about results that don't conform to reality) and even then errors are so large that's it's useless

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I was involved with a project trying to simulate growth of a crystal cluster a couple of years ago. The guy doing the coding said it would be easy. It never worked and never came remotely close.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 1 points 1 hour ago

in my case the size of the system was so small they didn't have that excuse, yet they were only ever able to get correct results after experimental data was handed over to them, zero predictive power, useless

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 17 hours ago

Model fetishism

[–] grue@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A Story About 'Magic', from ESR's "Jargon File"

Some years ago, I (GLS) was snooping around in the cabinets that housed the MIT AI Lab's PDP-10, and noticed a little switch glued to the frame of one cabinet. It was obviously a homebrew job, added by one of the lab's hardware hackers (no one knows who).

You don't touch an unknown switch on a computer without knowing what it does, because you might crash the computer. The switch was labeled in a most unhelpful way. It had two positions, and scrawled in pencil on the metal switch body were the words ‘magic' and ‘more magic'. The switch was in the ‘more magic' position.

I called another hacker over to look at it. He had never seen the switch before either. Closer examination revealed that the switch had only one wire running to it! The other end of the wire did disappear into the maze of wires inside the computer, but it's a basic fact of electricity that a switch can't do anything unless there are two wires connected to it. This switch had a wire connected on one side and no wire on its other side.

It was clear that this switch was someone's idea of a silly joke. Convinced by our reasoning that the switch was inoperative, we flipped it. The computer instantly crashed.

Imagine our utter astonishment. We wrote it off as coincidence, but nevertheless restored the switch to the ‘more magic’ position before reviving the computer.

A year later, I told this story to yet another hacker, David Moon as I recall. He clearly doubted my sanity, or suspected me of a supernatural belief in the power of this switch, or perhaps thought I was fooling him with a bogus saga. To prove it to him, I showed him the very switch, still glued to the cabinet frame with only one wire connected to it, still in the ‘more magic’ position. We scrutinized the switch and its lone connection, and found that the other end of the wire, though connected to the computer wiring, was connected to a ground pin. That clearly made the switch doubly useless: not only was it electrically nonoperative, but it was connected to a place that couldn't affect anything anyway. So we flipped the switch.

The computer promptly crashed.

This time we ran for Richard Greenblatt, a long-time MIT hacker, who was close at hand. He had never noticed the switch before, either. He inspected it, concluded it was useless, got some diagonal cutters and diked it out. We then revived the computer and it has run fine ever since.

We still don't know how the switch crashed the machine. There is a theory that some circuit near the ground pin was marginal, and flipping the switch changed the electrical capacitance enough to upset the circuit as millionth-of-a-second pulses went through it. But we'll never know for sure; all we can really say is that the switch was magic.

I still have that switch in my basement. Maybe I'm silly, but I usually keep it set on ‘more magic’.

1994: Another explanation of this story has since been offered. Note that the switch body was metal. Suppose that the non-connected side of the switch was connected to the switch body (usually the body is connected to a separate earth lug, but there are exceptions). The body is connected to the computer case, which is, presumably, grounded. Now the circuit ground within the machine isn't necessarily at the same potential as the case ground, so flipping the switch connected the circuit ground to the case ground, causing a voltage drop/jump which reset the machine. This was probably discovered by someone who found out the hard way that there was a potential difference between the two, and who then wired in the switch as a joke.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

reminds me of this copypasta

As someone who works on a big robotic mingun for the Navy you would not BELIEVE how close to home the Adeptus Mechanicus hits for me. For starters we have written procures that need to be followed to the letter like a ritual and deviating from it at all, especially during a spot check can get you in serious trouble.. Technicians are also really goddamned superstitious and for good reason. If you accidentally cut yourself on the equipment, it will start to work as if it's accepted your blood sacrifice. The mounts also all have names and their own personalities. If you do anything that displeases the machine spirit's they will not work. My favorite story I was told by one of my instructors in school was the time a bunch of Aegis techs sacrificed a live chicken to their their radar and sealed its bones inside a metal box and attached it to the radar console, after which it started working flawlessly. That is until the CO came by and saw this box stuck to it and ordered it be taken down. THE MOMENT it was taken down, the radar cut off and REFUSED to work. After countless man hours of troubleshooting this thing and finding nothing wrong, they have to fly a tech rep out to figure out what the hells the matter with this thing. They tell him what happened and his response? He puts the box back on the console becuase he knows what sort of black magic runs this equipment and lo and behold it starts working again. Whoever originally made the Machine Cult got it spot on what kind of culture a bunch of technicians would develop if left on their own for a millenia

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 10 points 15 hours ago

i love this story

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The Jargon File in general is such a treasure

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I like the koans page

Tom Knight and the Lisp Machine

A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.
Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: “You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong.”
Knight turned the machine off and on.
The machine worked.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 11 hours ago

seeing that jargon file has an extensive page on retrocomputing feels like figuring out that there were archeologists in ancient egypt

load more comments
view more: next ›