this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
258 points (99.2% liked)

News

37488 readers
3656 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. intelligence assessments suggest that President Donald Trump’s war in Iran has done little to slow the country’s nuclear capabilities, according to a report. Ensuring that Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon was one of the key objectives laid out by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the beginning of the war, which started on February 28. Two months on, Tehran’s nuclear program remains broadly unchanged since last year’s U.S. attack, according to Reuters news agency, citing intelligence sources familiar with the matter. The Trump administration’s Operation Midnight Hammer campaign in June 2025 pushed the timeline of the country’s nuclear capabilities back by nine months to a year, and it remains broadly unchanged now as the U.S. military has largely avoided striking nuclear targets this time, according to Reuters. Before last year’s 12-day war, U.S. intelligence agencies estimated that Iran could produce enough bomb-grade uranium to build a bomb in around three to six months, according to the outlet.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Let's not forget who stopped it: Mitch "I believe he did it, but I'm voting NOT GUILTY" McConnell.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And for stealing TS-SCI classified documents

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And his 34 felony counts of falsifying information he was even convicted for

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or for raping and sexually abusing all those women and children over the years

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And for selling military secrets to Saudi Arabia, or skirting election policy by suggesting Israel ignores Biden's attempts at a cease fire during the election cycle.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Or for violating the Emoluments Clause.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 57 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He's just told everyone in the world they need Nukes or the US might attack them randomly. I'm pretty certain Iran will speedrun Nukes or just buy one outright from Russia now.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He has, but in fairness Russia told everyone that when it invaded Ukraine, who had nukes and gave them up! And also Trump told everyone again last year when he first attacked Tehran last year… and when he did the coup d’état in Venezuela.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention how North Korea is a lot more untouched than it otherwise probably would be.

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

North Korea was untouchable from the beginning due to all the artillery it has embedded in the mountains, aimed at Seoul. The Korean peninsula was a hostage situation whereby the North would destroy Seoul at the first sign of trouble and nobody, not even the USA, was able to do anything about it.

North Korea sought nukes not for security but to give it options for further extortion.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

Oh bullshit

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also NK low-key has (had?) unofficial backing from China.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Has, though its been reduced as China doesn't really care about coal anymore which was the main trade export.

Also Russian support as NK artillery supplies and troops have been used in Ukraine. There was talk about the defect rate and it is a thing that will contribute to Ukraine difficulty after the war in mine/undetonated munitions-clearing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

They certainly should.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, the scary part of all of this is its likely to reverse much of the progress made for nuclear deproliferation. The reason that deproliferation became possible was because the post-cold war stability of those nations with large stock piles led to enough trust that other nuclear powers did not actually wish to use them that they could all collectively start dismantling them.

Enter Trump 2.0, bump up the crazy from last time but remove the career officials with any amount of sense that tempered his worst notions and replace them with violent, stupid, fascist yes men. Now he's breaking international laws, invading countries and kidnapping leaders, and preemptively bombing nations he's not at war with while threatening to kill their entire civilization... all while sitting on the world's second largest known remaining stock pile. And the country with the most is also in year 4 of an increasingly desperate invasion of Ukraine and butting heads with other nuclear powers.

To say the trust of the world has been shaken is likely an understatement. Those without nuclear weapons are probably justified in wanting them, and those with them are probably wondering if they need more.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Absolutely. We've pretty much shown that having a nuclear weapon is the only deterrent that matters to the US. They'd be stupid if they didn't rush to acquire them.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago

Iran should consider nukes ASAP.

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago

M orons

A re

G overning

A merica!

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

so about $75 BILLION (they claimed $25B but aren't accounting for a lot of stuff) to push it back 9 months.

But hey it worked, we're not talking about how Trump trafficked and raped young girls with Epstein.

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

You forget all the money made from manipulating the markets! Release the Trump*Epstein files!!

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

You mean giving them a compelling reason to pursue nuclear weapons at all costs as the only means of securing their sovereign status has NOT made them stop trying to get nuclear weapons.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Trumps extended war just took the heat off of him for being a fucking pedophile

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Much as I abhor Iran's ultaconservative theocracy (the USA's too for that matter), I can understand that them having nuclear ability would be about the only way they could be secure from attack.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So then what is the goal of that war?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

To justify and further enrich the American military industrial complex

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Slow it as much as possible

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Siphon as much money as possible while corroding the economy as much as possible

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago

This is sempiternal

Over and over again and again