this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
485 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

84748 readers
4593 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

Musk’s claims include breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment.

Seriously. A billionaire is accusing another billionaire of unjust enrichment ? Every billionaire ever is by definition guilty of unjust enrichment. There's simply no other way to become a billionaire.

The company, which is aiming to build the world’s first fusion power plant, does not generate any revenue but has been valued in the private market at $5.4 billion.

This is honestly insane. A company that produces nothing and is almost certainly a scam is valued at $5.4 billion? Valued by whom?

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 128 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Doesn't Elon do the same thing such as when SpaceX bought a fleet of Cybertrucks?

Just sounds like how the rich move wealth around to stay/look wealthy.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or when SpaceX bought Grok?

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or when Tesla bought SolarCity

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

OR WHEN THIS MOTHERFUCKER STOLE OUR MONEY AND CONSISTENTLY EVEN RIGHT NOW CONVINCED US THAT ITS OKAY THAT WE'RE NOT RANSACKING EVERY PUBLICLY LISTED PERSON OR PROPERTY THAT ENABLE(S/D) IT?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I dont know that people really recognize that its their money being stolen.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or when grok bought Twitter

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Even if proven and convicted, none of these rich fucks will ever see any consequences beyond a slap on the wrist fine -- almost certainly a fine much smaller than the profits they made through this fraud. And then, just out of spite, they'll appeal it in a higher court and get the fine reduced or tossed out entirely.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Correct. Sounds like extracurricular activies are in order.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

You have WAY too much faith in the American court system. Don't worry, you too will get disillusioned. Just give it some time.

[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago

Nahh... He's too rich. As long as he doesn't overtly steal from the rich, he'll be fine. There is no accountability for people that wealthy because wealth is value and power in the western world. Steal from the poor, you get rich; steal from the rich, you go to prison..

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

also questioned Altman about a $10 billion computing deal with Cerebras, in which Altman holds a stake worth $3.2 million.

It's a $20B deal. Covering just first 3 years of full datacenter lease. It's a bit strange of a deal where 3 year lease payments are higher than cost of datacenter, and an Nvidia alternative would have better economics, even if Cerebras can do some things well. Altman with a personal stake, can explain OpenAI's generosity in the deal.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He sucks almost as much as musk. Thiel is still supreme vermin though.

[–] hypnicjerk@piefed.social 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

how the fuck does he have those kinds of assets despite never coming close to delivering a profit?

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He profits just fine. The companies not so much.

Except NVIDIA, they're making shovels and shitloads and he probably gets something under the table from them too.

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just like the circular deals 90% of the "profits" we've seen reported by these AI companies is just fake money

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Like altcoin exchanges, except real companies are now the altcoins

[–] vane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

OpenAI has raised a total of around $180B. He just took ~1%.

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You thought he was non profit? Dudes probably pocketing 30-40% of the companies money

[–] Zier@fedia.io 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's just another con man shoving snake oil on society.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Just another conman with a physical location. You can't hide from 8 billion people.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI clowns? Self dealing?

Surely impossible.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only two industries left in America: gambling and fraud. And AI is definitely in the 'fraud' category.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

It’s also kind of gambling on getting useful results

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

How much is that percentage wise? Because 2 billion of Nvidia ain't that much

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This was a well-discussed standard corporate recusal.

Which ignores his obvious influence outside of the vote. It is "standard", but it doesn't change a damn thing, which of course, they all know very well. They all sit on each other's boards, and exclude, as well they can, any other shareholder from gaining a seat.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

It’s surely not self-dealing. It’s his AI that does business with those companies, not him, so it’s all legal.

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I continue to wonder why haven't the American people done what they should have been doing already and.... do what they need to do?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The well armed and tremendously violent police who visciously beat or kill citizens all still walk free in the US. Anyone who admits to not loving fascism is legally consideted a violent terrorist. Thats the math american citizens are working with. And the dems are barely any better than the repubs. Thats before we even begin to talk about US support of massive crimes against humanity, unanimous from both parties.

[–] chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

what does that mean here? if sam altman was gone, the looming AI problem is solved? realistically, what exactly do americans need to do