this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
213 points (97.8% liked)

News

37762 readers
2688 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Cost savings just when looking at fuel costs, but if you add in the lack of routine maintenance and moving parts that can wear out, the cost savings multiply. There's the big ticket high voltage battery, but typically that's a matter of reduced capacity rather than a complete failure.

[–] dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Not only that but certain models use modular battery packs, so you can replace individual cells when they wear out rather than the whole battery.

So instead of having to spend somewhere around $20k, you may only need to pay $3-4k to replace a worn cell which is closer in cost to a hybrid battery replacement.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Tesla Ford and VW are the ones I’m aware of, but I’m sure there are others.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

if you add in the lack of routine maintenance and moving parts that can wear out, the cost savings multiply.

Time. There's a "time not spent dicking around with dealerships/mechanics" component here too. This is the reason why I bought an EV a few years go. I got fed up with the gas engine maintenance ecosystem and paid my way out. I was literally buying time.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I didn't even consider this when I bought my EV. After about six months I had to look up the suggested service schedule to make sure I wasn't missing anything.

Exactly. First scheduled service with my EV was a joke; it amounted to a minor recall and a tire rotation. I was using regenerative breaking so much, they said that the factory brakes didn't even look worn. The service manager actually looked surprised by this.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago

This is why i didn't even want a hybrid for my next car. I'm tired of changing the oil and still refuse to pay someone to do it. I just didn't want to have 2 cars and i didn't see myself making trips is about with and ev unless the infrastructure for charging is as easy as spotting a gas station.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Great, now can we make them more affordable please?

[–] bo5on@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You probably already know this but paper covers total cost of ownership. I think we agree cost of EVs is significantly inflated but for many use cases TCO is still lower than ICE vehicles. So if you're in the market for purchasing a car definitely worth investigating!

Meh. I'll easily settle for better public transit, thanks.

[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The new Slate mini pick up trucks are expected to be in production this year and come in around $20k new. Used EVs already come in under $20k and are good enough for daily commuting in that price range, perhaps not long distance road trips at that price

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to mention the added convenience of for the most part never having to actively fuel up.

By that I mean, you park at home, plug in a cable, and walk away, you don't actively have to drive to a petrol station and wait a few minutes while fuel is being pumped

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, homeowners and luxury apartment renters only. There aren't any EV hookups in the parking lots of any of the affordable apartments in my city.

I am not saying EV's aren't important, I'm saying that there are huge economic barriers between the people who would benefit the most from EV's and actually owning one.

Hopefully the next political cycle will subsidize charging stations like the Biden administration did.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure there's only one apartment building in my city that has any charging stations. There's one gas station that I know of that's replaced a couple pumps with charging stations too. Other than that, I think there might be just a few businesses that have charging stations, usually car dealerships.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Its not as if this is an insurmountable issue though. Apartment parking lots already have electricity running through them. Where my sister lives in the Midwest, lots already have outlets available at each parking spot so that people can plug their block heaters in during the winter.

[–] Soupbreaker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is not a thing at any apartment complex I've lived in or visited in the south/southeastern US. Also, if you're renting a house that doesn't already have a charger installed, it doesn't make any sense to buy an EV.

Not arguing that it isn't solvable, but for many people, the infrastructure just isn't currently extant, nor is the political will to solve the problem.

If you're renting a house, a lot of people can get away with the standard 110V house plug. I put about 12K miles on mine last year and unless I was on a road trip, then it would charge up at home just fine. Adds about 1.5% per hour and I'm typically not driving it more than that adds back every day.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you are renting a house, you don't even need to install any charger, your garage will surely have wall outlets to plug your tools in, they can charge the car perfectly fine, and slow overnight charging is enough for most people's commute.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don’t know the answer to this but, how does the power demands for charging EVs compare to block heaters?

Also, how do EVs deal with the cold up there? Heating the cabin would take a ton of power.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I dont have numbers so take this with a grain of salt, but I would guess they're probably not too far off from one another. With 110V charging, it'll be slow but effective for overnight charging, and resistive heating elements use an insane amount of power especially when they're trying to warm something constantly in -10F weather.

I live in the PNW and dont have to deal with much cold weather but from everything I've read, EVs handle thr cold just fine.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last winter in Chicago the chargers could not work. Then the range loss is 40-50%. This is better with sodium battery but they are not common yet.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Range loss is not even anywhere close to 40-50% on a heat pump equipped EV. Even at -20°C I still get 75% range from my Ioniq

Yeah, if it wasn't heaters I would be confident that the wattage wouldn't be enough. But it might be fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (9 children)

And yet American automobile companies are dinosaurs who want to kill EVs.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah if I had a charging station anywhere near my apartment building.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This has been in the back of my mind ever since I last rented an apartment. Short of dangling an extension cord off your balcony, there's not much that can be done here. You might luck out and get a job somewhere that has charging stations, but that's a big "if".

This also generates a deep concern in my mind for poor folks that can only afford to rent. As they say, "it's expensive to be poor" and having little alternative but to drive gas-burning cars to/from work is only going to crunch budgets harder as time goes on.

Meanwhile, we can't count on landlords to install these things. My last one was the sort that couldn't be bothered to hire painters that understood what masking tape was; moving day was half spent picking paint out of light switches and electrical sockets.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's the perfect place for government regulation. Start a tiered approach where larger apartment complexes have to electrify a certain percentage of there parking spaces. Every year make the size of the apartment building that has to do this shrink and increase the percentage of parking spaces that require electrification. Also make it a requirement that these electrified spots can't be more than x dollars per kilowatt hour or have them tied to the owner's electrical usage.

There are a lot of ways you can do this, but this is really something that needs to be done through the government for it to happen for low-cost apartments.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Free charging at work for me so it's just a no brainer. I also just do lots of 10-15min trips which destroys ICE cars.

[–] madkins@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Love my EV. For my use case, it's great. A couple things to watch out for that factor into cost calculations : Home charging is almost a requirement. Fast charging is almost as expensive as gas (probably because they've dialed it in to be so), slow charging is, well, slow. You really have to plan around slow charging.

I just had to renew my tag and my other vehicles were $21. My EV was $255. The logic is, since EVs are paying for tax on fuel to go towards road works, they have to make up for it elsewhere. I'm fine with this, but I don't drive a lot in a year and $255 is way more than the tax I would have spent for gas. Also, I'm pretty sure gas tax has been suspended in my state. So I'm subsidizing the cost for ICE vehicles. Check your state for rules.

Lastly, (and this may be more impactful for my EV which is kinda performance biased) driving Interstate miles eats up your range a lot more. I used to put the cruise control on 75 MPH pretty much all the time. I've found 65-67 is about the break even point to get the miles I should.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The real horseshit about the fuel tax thing is that that gas tax gets suspended all the fucking time, but do I get a break on my road tax too? Hah ha, no, fuck you says the Republicans who implement the fuel type fee and then suspended the gas tax.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I could have a sensible small to mid sized EV car.

Or get a jacked up monster truck and be rolling coal everywhere.

/s

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

As well as government remote disable and always-on corporate tracking!!!!1!1

Until I can kit my 1991 Accord with a wholly owned conversion I will not be touching one, nor any other car built later than 2010.

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's new cars, not just EVs

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hence why I said no car made past 2010.... Its in the comment.

[–] speculate7383@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It took me all of about 20 minutes to remove the SIM chip from my 2015 Leaf, following a youtube video that showed everything step by step.

AFAIK, all cars before 2021 still have physical SIM chips, so easy to remove and disable the telematics.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Even if you can't remove a SIM (as in a case of an eSIM), simply disconnecting the mobile cellular antennas and grounding them would likely prevent it ever from connecting to a network.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I clearly do not have good reading comprehension

Understandable

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

My early gen 9 civic is a year or two newer than that, but I think its the last model year it DID NOT have a sim.

[–] madkins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You may be able to. I saw this the other day; really cool project: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8pY5Ntd/

'82 Toyota pickup conversion, BTW.

load more comments
view more: next ›