this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48148 readers
1689 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The 9[am] to 5[pm]" is a common term for one's regular job, on the basis that normal people start work at 09:00 and finish at 17:00. I've worked a few jobs and closest I've ever gotten to this is 08:00 to 17:00, which I gather is standard.

Are there real jobs where people actually start at 9 and finish at 5?

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I have not found one. If I come in at 9, leave at 18, or 18:30, if I come in at 8, same. So I come in at 9.

But in general here it's a 9 hour day with an hour break for lunch, that makes the 8 hour workday.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So this gets back to why I point to the 70's as sorta being the height of things. Both the song and the movie 9 to 5 was based around how poor shlubs had to work 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, with barely enough to get by on including you know going out every week. Anyway I am unsure if anyone does it now but I know as recently as the 90's if you worked for certain old school businesses like banking you could actually have a job that was 9 to 5 and you got a lunch that was compensated. Get this. It was often an hour. So you worked 7 hours a day and got paid for 8.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 1 points 47 minutes ago

I work 7.5 hours and get paid for it all, even my half hour lunch.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 1 points 54 minutes ago

I work a 9-5 office job in the USA but it’s seasonal and there are people who work different hours so that the office can stay open til 7

Yes, I do.

Officially I’m 9-5 with an hour for lunch.

[–] zout@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

In the Netherlands: blue collar mostly 7:30 - 16:00, white collar half an hour or an hour later.

junior software developer in Europe, my work hours are 9-5, with an hour for lunch. In reality I work a bit shorter hours because the daily's at 10, and nobody really cares how many breaks I take as long as I get the work done

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 13 points 5 hours ago

No. Companies have stolen 2 extra hours from us. They used to include a paid lunch hour in those 8 hours. Now, it's not only 8-5, but we don't get paid for the lunch hour.

[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 4 points 3 hours ago

I work 7:30 - 15:30. I hate waking up so early but it is nice to have time to run errands.

[–] mech@feddit.org 42 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I work from 8:30 to 16:00 with a half-hour lunch break, so 7 work hours per day.
It's paid as a full-time job.
If I collect too much over-time, I get a stern talking-to from my supervisor, who could otherwise get in trouble with the works council and the owners (cause they'd get in trouble with the union and the law). So I make sure to go home on time.
I have 42 days of paid time off I HAVE to take, plus unlimited sick days.

I could have made 50% more by chosing a different employer, and 3-4x as much in the US.
But why the hell would I? I'm able to save up 1/3 of my take-home pay as it is, and that's after pension and healthcare are accounted for.

[–] snowydroopz@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Wait wait, what type of country treats its citizens like humans?

[–] mech@feddit.org 29 points 6 hours ago

I live in Germany, but that's not normal here, either. I deliberately chose an employer with a strong union and high worker solidarity and was lucky enough to switch jobs when my skills were in high demand.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago

One of the jobs I had was 9am to 5pm for about a year. For me, that was practically heaven because prior to that it had been 9am to 6pm for a few years, and the shorter hours didn't come with a pay cut.

It got weird later because I took on a rotating shift pattern and more responsibility, but some of the day shifts were still 9 till 5.

Then I jumped ship to a different company that had 9am to 6pm again, but that turned out to be preferable to the hell of not being able to sleep properly.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Usually 8am to 5 30 or 6pm for me.

We are supposed to record 9 hours of work on our timesheet daily. Sometimes there isnt enough work but then you just do goals or organize shit or read some how to's. I hate those days. I like being busy.

It is long days though. A 6 hour day would be fantastic but I'd get nothing done. Today, I spent 4 hours opening a program on several different remote PCs because it kept crashing.

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 19 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 2 points 1 hour ago

That's all it took to get the song in my head lol

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 27 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

From what I've heard 9-5 was a thing before employees were given a mandatory 1 hour lunch break which was counted as non-work time. So basically the work schedule was shifted to account for break time no longer being counted as part of the work day.

Of course I've never looked into it, so there's a good chance it's not that :p

[–] grue@lemmy.world 55 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You mean, before employers stole our paid lunch breaks and gaslit everyone into forgetting about them.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 10 points 6 hours ago

Yeah that :3

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This is correct, lots of places that were 9 to 5 would give people a lunch half hour or a lunch hour that would technically be on the clock. When lunch hours became mandatory employers went well fuck that and made it so you didn’t get paid for your lunch. Most people don’t realize off the top of their heads but 8 to 5 is actually nine hours.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It would be interesting to see a filter of responses by country.

In my experience:

  • Architecture / Eng / Construction Industry (Canada):
    • 8-5, summer hours, loosely enforced.
  • Software Industry (Europe):
    • 9-5, several extra weeks of vacation, loosely enforced
  • Software Industry (America):
    • 9-6, moderately enforced
  • Software Industry (Canada):
    • 9-5, summer hours, loosely enforced
[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Technically no, in actuality, yes. I can start and finish as long as my hours are my contracted hours, but I have a daily meeting at 9 so I start my day with that meeting everyday. And then if I work normally, I finish at 5

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 11 points 5 hours ago

I believe in wresting back any amount of control/time we can from the system.

So my job has me coming in at 8:30-9:30am and leaving at 3:30pm every day, thanks to training my boss and working the system.

And honestly I am switching to a hybrid WFH job because even this is too much office time.

They don't give me a window, so I am letting myself get recruited elsewhere.

[–] azdle@news.idlestate.org 16 points 6 hours ago

I currently work 8:00 to 16:00 and no one has complained about my working hours yet. But, I'm a software dev working remote with coworkers in several different timezones, so the exact time I start and end my day really doesn't matter.

At a previous job I worked 9:00 - 15:00 for several months when I was depressed and no one complained about that either. 🤷

[–] Ele7en7@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Yes, I work 9 to 5

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

All but one of my jobs (excluding hourly jobs as a teen) have been 9-5, the one that wasn’t was 9-6 with the justification that we had a 1 hour lunch in the middle… but like… I’ve taken a 1 hour lunch at every job… so I have no idea why that company was such a stickler for that. Basically no one did shit after like 4pm anyways

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 6 hours ago

1 hour lunch means you are expected to leave the office (or at least not work). Some countries get really strict about a one hour lunch break where you don't do any work and so it is carefully enforced there.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Way back when I had fixed working hours, it was usually 0800 to 1600

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 8 points 6 hours ago

Strict working hours are important for jobs like assembly line work where if you are not at your station nobody else can do any work. Often they do build enough slack in that they expect you can take a couple bites here and there between doing your work. Though this isn't the most sanitary so it isn't common anymore.

For anyone doing work that doesn't depend on others being at their station at the same time a strict shift doesn't make sense, and there are not many assembly lines left like that (the assembly lines I have seen lately are much shorter and your team of 10 needs to work the same shift but your team can choose lunch time, and if you get the team's work done faster everyone can even get an extended lunch.

[–] bran_buckler@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

All of my jobs have been 9-5, lunch included. I think the key is whether you’re paid hourly or by salary. I’ve almost exclusively worked at tech startups as a salaried employee.

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

US Midwest 9-5 jobs are normal even when not really sensical for all businesses. Very much a control and “you sit here cause I pay you to.” I worked a place that expected 8:30am - 5:30pm with an hour lunch break. Salaried work. I worked hourly at a distribution center that was 8:30 - 5:00pm with half hour lunch.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Yes. I do. Dealership mechanic. 9-5

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Factory jobs are 6-14 and 14-22 (and 22-6 if there's a rush), and office jobs usually 7-15, including a 30-min break. Then there's the service sector, depending on when the shop opens...

[–] valar@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I have worked 9 to 5 in every office job I've had (salaried). Including lunch.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 6 hours ago

I could come in an hour late and skip lunch break to make it 9-to-5.

I work 7-4 with an hour at lunch.

[–] plactagonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

I don't know anyone that has it that strict.

On shift work it is standard to get 6:00 - 14:00, 14:00 - 22:00 and 22:00 - 6:00. And most people I know that have office work usually have some flexible arrangement like you have to work 8h and have to be here for meetings 9:00 - 13:00, so some people arrive at 9 and leave at 5 or you can arrive at 6 and leave at 2...

Other jobs like teachers, doctors... have just completely different schedules each day.

[–] roguelazer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

There are still some of those that I'm familiar with, mostly entry-level white collar professional jobs like "receptionist" or "desktop IT".

Beyond that, the 9-5 is dead, though. A lot of the rest of American white-collar jobs are 24x7 where you're expected to respond to slack or email within a few minutes all day, and probably also be in the office 8-10 hours per day. And working-class jobs have all moved to unscheduled part time nonsense where they'll give you 29.5 hours a week (to avoid having to give you benefits), but won't tell you which 29.5 hours until the last possible moment.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Don't I wish ..I'm there 8AM TO 5 fucking PM

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago

When I started my current job it was a proper 9-5 with a half hour paid lunch.

They've now switched us to an hour unpaid lunch, but everyone basically just ignores it.

And in both cases many of those hours are downtime.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

I've spent 20 something years ostensibly working 9 - 5. But most of those years I've also on call for server downtime, and crunch-time is sometimes a thing.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Nobody wants that, but it still beats working 09:00 - 21:00

[–] illi@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Technically. I work 8-17, but there is a 1h lunch break.

Usually the mandated lunch break is 30min so 8-16:30 would be the norm here.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Where do you live? In Germany it's common to work only 8 hours on a work day. I've had jobs in software development where you had flexible enough times that you could choose to work 9-17:00, though flexible times isn't quite what "9 to 5 job" implies.

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That would be illegal though, above 6 hours of work you are required to take a 30 minutes break.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

True, it's usually 7,5h work days if you're not doing overtime or part time.