Fuck off with this "accused" bullshit.
He was found by a judge to have raped her.
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
193 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30324 readers
2994 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
He was found by a jury to have raped her. The judge agreed.
He could have taken a simple DNA test to exonerate himself.
He chose to pay her off instead.
Hmmmmmm
That was my thought exactly. You can call Trump a rapist without worrying about libel or slander. A judge has basically given everyone permission.
Not if you're sane washing him from his side of the line. They're complicit.
Does Don John have a Rape Victims section on his Wikipedia page yet?
Be the change you want to see
She is his adjudicated rape victim, not accuser
"Justice" Department...
New name needed.
Just Us Department
Love how the article is still pretending she was a victim of alleged assault despite courts ruling she was raped. Wow AP, you have fallen.
Courts ruled she was sexually abused, not raped. The judge said the assault fit the colloquial usage of "rape" but not the narrower legal definition.
Not that it really matters. Trump is a rapist.
Potato, Potato.
Oh, so the fully non-biased presidential attack dog agency is going to determine ~~if~~ she lied?
Think she'll be eligible for any of that $1.8B 'weaponized prosecution' fund?
Accused?
Wasn't he convicted of that rape?
It was a civil case, not a criminal case. That's why Trump's an "adjudicated rapist" instead of "convicted rapist". And yes, there is a difference. That difference being his requirement to compensate her financially, rather than him be sentenced to "federal get-fucked-in-the-ass prison".
I think the main difference is actually the burden of proof needed. For civil cases, it's "the preponderance of evidence," and criminal is, "beyond a reasonable doubt".
However, that doesn't mean he is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Just that it didn't need to be proved in court to get the ruling.
He wasn't convicted. He was found liable since it was a civil suit.
She accused Trump, the court convicted him.
Disgusting.
Trump blubbers about "lawfare" to the tune of $1.8 billion and then does this...
Rules for thee but not for me.
Pretty on brand….
Projection
They are probably investigating all of the Epstein survivor too. Nice way to spend the taxes of your citizens USA.
Why is it even being called "The Justice Department"? At this point just call it The Trump Department.
“Trump’s tax funded lawyers”
For fucking what?
For intimidation.
It's the implication.
Dead link?