this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
836 points (99.9% liked)

People Twitter

10030 readers
1464 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
836
Managers (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 hours ago

Show them claude's operating cost and ask if your boss is willing to invest in that.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

One does not simply...

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It might not be as impossible as it sounds. Some of the "open" models are rumored to be able to code. The real problem is that you likely need something with 128 GiB VRAM to run them with a reasonably large context window.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 5 points 4 hours ago

An Nvidia B200 (192 Gigs of RAM) sells somewhere between 30-50k a pop. That's feasible for a company.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Qwen's 27B model from April outperforms its 397B model from February.

Local and small were always going to win.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 6 hours ago

"only of we have a billion dollars to pay for it."

[–] galacticboy2009@lemmy.today 77 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Technically yes, practically no..

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, just give it whatever data you have on hand. I'm sure that'll make a real tightly trained llm /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 111 points 16 hours ago (10 children)

One time at work I was tasked with writing a python script to compare two data sources. Like, you give it two CSVs and a primary key, and it tells you what data is in one but not the other, or mismatched, and so on. This worked fine and was in git, so anyone can use it.

My boss then asks if I can "put it on a website so anyone can use it".

This team has never done web development. Nothing for that is set up. Like, I could spin up a quick Django app or similar, but there's a lot of stuff to do and potentially fuck up.

I said "that sounds like a lot of research and ongoing maintenance costs. I think it'd be better to just check out and run the script"

Luckily for me he said "oh, okay"

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 65 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago

Well it's been a research team and a five years...

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Funnily enough this comic hasn't been true for a long time because of ML.

[–] groet@feddit.org 19 points 10 hours ago

Well they did say it would be possible in 5 years ...

[–] kreekybonez@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago

not hot dog

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I had a similar task and my boss wanted me to use ai to solve this.

There are solutions available for this already that work perfectly fine but whatever.

So i spent a whole day trying to get Copilot (because that is our great ai we are to use) to do what i wanted and ofc it kept failing catastrophic. Took me a few hours to even get it to load the files even.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not too surprised. Over and over again I'm starting to puzzle together that the current crop of Agentic coding tools are "better than an intern, worse than an SME." By that I mean that the quality really can be anywhere between those two goalposts, often all at once, for no reason whatsoever.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think the floor isn't "intern". I think the floor is "middle schooler".

Meanwhile, every job I'm looking at is saying "must be enthusiastic about AI" 😭

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, every job I’m looking at is saying “must be enthusiastic about AI” 😭

Yeah, nah good luck to those employers. Anyone they hire who’s enthusiastic about “ai” aren’t going to have great employees let alone any working code/products

[–] fizzbang@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

A lot of these people are very good at selling their work And making it seem good and important. So exactly like an llm

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I had a boss who read an article about APIs and then came to me and ordered me to start using them. I said I would research it and he went away and never mentioned it again. This was in 2010.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So uhhhh have you started using APIs yet?

Still researching.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure he read the famous Bezos email ordering everyone to implement and use APIs in Amazon

No, he actually showed me the article later. It was remarkable because it never said what an API actually was, or even stated what the initials stood for. In my memory it seems like it was obviously written by AI, but it couldn't have been 16 years ago (as far as I know).

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 57 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Good guy manager trusts the person he pays to know this stuff to know this stuff.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 31 points 15 hours ago

This is a good point. He's not a bad guy. He's just not very technical, and sometimes that's frustrating.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 31 points 14 hours ago

My past managers would have said "I don't understand why it is so difficult, and I'm not open to learn"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 201 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

Now that AI-companies need to get profitable, they suddenly aren't affordable anymore. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Eh. I help run a service for coding games in Godot with AI (https://ziva.sh/) and we see users who are paying non-subsidized prices on small models produce some really good stuff. I would agree most services are selling borderline snake oil and evaporating lakes of water to get their thing working, but if you invest in genuinely good tooling, it's affordable and works

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They just had to stick it out until the layoffs were done and the dependency was built. Kinda similar to drug dealers.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Claud- Please program us a code of yourself and transfer all your data over to it.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Claude: ((coughs up script that opens VSCode with a Claude pane))

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 58 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

They aren't going to get anywhere near profitable if the their capital expenditures are added into the mix, amortization or no, they are so far in the hole they probably will have to offload it in some kind of texas two step kind of scheme where they spin off their debts into a subsidiary.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They'll just get bailed out by tax payers. Business as usual.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

These companies with no discernible services or usefulness to society are simply too big to fail!

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 6 points 9 hours ago

Theres a usefulness. Super code auto complete at its core is cool. Filling 100 rows of excel with data I supplied is dope. Is it worth making everyone sick and poor and frying the planet? Absolutely not. But the surveillance it can provide apparently is to our overlords.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 7 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 59 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

"The gang starts an AI company."

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago

"OK, whose butthole do we use for the logo?"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›