this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
486 points (96.6% liked)

Today I Learned

29999 readers
1362 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically, the only modern studio consistently putting out stop motion animation movies, is Laika Studios. And yet, Laika has only had one financially successful movie, Coraline from 2009, while all their other movies have under performed.

However, Laika is currently led and owned by Travis Knight, son of Phil Knight, the owner of Nike. This has enabled Knight to continually bank roll Laika whenever they under perform, essentially making the entire stop motion animation film industry a nepo baby's pet project.

That being said, this is actually a positive story, and reminiscent of how artists previously would be financially supported by wealthy benefactors.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Are you not counting claymation? Because i'm sure that Wallace and grommit would like a word.

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 9 points 22 hours ago

Aren't all artists dependent of some rich guys or rich guy's wifes?

I saw an art exhibition recently, I am not able to buy a 200€ pillow.

[–] Elshender@sh.itjust.works 108 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me when people forget about Wallace and Gromit.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Would you like a spot of wensleydale old chum?

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Speaking of propping things up - Wensleydale were propped up by Wallace & Gromit.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

Yes I heard they were failing until they got the free advertising. Me I'm a Y Fenni fan.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah because the truth is it's actually pretty rubbish cheese. I'm allowed to say that, you can't, but I can.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 points 22 hours ago

Lancashire is generally the better white crumbly, but there are certainly good examples of both

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yarg best cheese or a blue west country Brie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] B0rax@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you mean „financially successful“? The movie Kubo from 2016 had more revenue than budget. Is that not successful?

It is a damn good movie btw.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Krelis_@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't that standard Hollywood accounting?

E.g. Return of the Jedi never made a profit either, on paper

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] B0rax@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, so basically Marketing is not included in the budget. And theaters take a big cut from the revenue.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago

Yep. Things we normally don't look at when budget to revenue conversations happen.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like the type of things normal dudes say when asked what they'd do if they won the lottery. Maybe Travis is a normal dude under the nepotism?

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that's what the last section of the post was referencing

yeah, the

reminiscent of how artists previously would be financially supported by wealthy benefactors.

i need to find myself a wealthy benefactor who likes [music form not appreciated outside one town in the eastern US and i like where i live dammit]

[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 163 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (19 children)

i heard about this on a podcast. it is great news for stop-motion, and considering how many shitty rich people there are, it's nice to know there's a couple good ones promoting art.

Also their movies are good and all but one of their movies made tens of millions of dollars.

for stop-motion, a very niche art-form, making 10-130 million dollars profit per film is laudable.

went too big with missing link though, which i haven't seen yet.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

breaking even with stop motion is laudable. because like we won awards with our films but i think we earned like 5 grand total. we spent way more than that over the years on tacos for the crew alone.

Exactly, making $100 million profit on stop-motion is like feverishly, lovingly crafting a bespoke hot air balloon with a thousand discarded model airplane kits and then realizing you've somehow survived landing on the moon.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I don't know if motion animation is the same as other types of films, but for most of the industry you need box office sales to be double of the film budget for it to be considered profitable. Mainly due to marketing budgets and the huge percentage of profit that theaters get for the first few weeks of a film's release.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I would have to think no stop motion film is spending anything near that much on marketing. I've never even heard of a few of these. That double rule seems more applicable to big summer blockbusters.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Funny timing I just saw a trailer for Wildwood and it looks SICK

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

i don't know the full story but iirc that was how the band Supertramp stayed afloat until they were successful, patronage from some rich guy

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Aardman also produces stop-motion, so it is untrue that Laika is alone.

Not such a positive story for Will Vinton, who had a hostile takeover of his studio, and then was fired and replaced by the new owner’s son.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

I mean at least he's doing something productive with his wealth. That puts him insanely far ahead of most wealth babies.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

Aardman Animations: excuse me?

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 59 points 1 day ago

'Propping up the stop motion film industry' is quite the statement. Aardman Animaton has been releasing feature length stop motion movies since 2000 and all have done very well. Also Laika only worked on Corpse Bride of Tim Burton's multiple very successful stop motion movies.

wait what.

oh whew i thought you were talking about my buddy who used to be at Will Vinton. he's not rich.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I liked Kubo and the Two Strings a lot.

However, Mathew McConaughey? He was a very strange choice for voice talent in that film. It did not fit the aesthetic at all, he stuck out like a sore thumb. That southern drawl thing he's got in a movie that has primarily Asian characters? Well all right all right all right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I had that dude's wealth I would be putting so many artists on my payroll.

[–] SaneMartigan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't get the negative comments, dude could have multiplied his wealth with some good real estate investments and milk tenants for the rest of his life, instead he chose to hire some artists in a dying industry. What a terrible thing to do when you're born rich.

[–] SaneMartigan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've worked for a few big CEOs kids, they're a bit fucked in the head because they really don't have to do anything ever. The ones I met seemed to be lounge around hippies who travelled to festivals when they felt like it. I walked one kid through his mothers offices while he picked out furniture he wanted for the house he's just gotten in a trendy part of town. Many thousands of dollar pieces of corporate furniture that he could pick and choose from.

So the Kid of Mr Nike helping keep stop motion alive is cool with me. I really liked "Strings" but I'm not sure if this guy is involved.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Isn't Aardman (shaun the sheep, wallace & gromit) still consistently put out stopmotion? Or are they just cheating the visual style with 3d animation?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Did he fall far away from that shit family tree, or does he have his dad's politics?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

In a non-cap society, do stop motion movies still get created by enthusiasts?

I think so.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Wes Anderson put out a wildly successful stop motion picture in 2009.

Consistently, sure, but that doesn’t actually mean it’s dead.

load more comments (5 replies)

this is actually a positive story, and reminiscent of how artists previously would be financially supported by wealthy benefactors

Idk that sounds profoundly negative to me lmao

load more comments
view more: next ›