this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
280 points (99.6% liked)

News

37935 readers
2979 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago
[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where's Pam Bondi asking for the Death Penalty?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t you mean Todd Blanche?

Bondi is probably vacationing in a pile of corruption cash right now.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 23 hours ago

Still can't get over the fact that the acting attorney general AND the Deputy Attorney general AND the Librarian of Congress is just one sleazy personal lawyer named Todd 🤦🏻

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Minnesota doesn't have a death penalty. Unless he's brought up under the right federal charges we'll be paying for this piece of excrement to rot in prison.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Due to the mandatory appeals, additional court time, and increased cost of death row incarceration during the trial, life in prison is usually less expensive for the tax payer than the death penalty.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know, still I hate we're wasting money on them.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As someone who's anti death penalty for any case, I'd prefer we waste money on incarcerating people if we must, rather than risk killing the wrong person. People have made entire careers out of justifying why an (usually) innocent person has to die, using a lot of junk science (bite mark, hair, thread analysis, a lot of CSI stuff is absolute bullshit or at least no better than 50/50).

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The death penalty is nothing more than "mob justice" if you ask me. I still think pedophiles like some of our politicians should get the guillotine because they make me sick, but hell even a murderer I wouldn't want death penalty for.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's only a niche case I'd be for it, someone like a Timothy McVeigh. Now if we have rehabilitation instead of punishment prisons.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Still the same thing. While you may rightly claim mass murder/terrorism is worse than singular murder, the same logic applies. Why should we waste time and process on this vile person, and what if we made a mistake?

[–] Darkonion@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Have the death penalty, but only if the lead prosecutor goes down with them and can only ever be involved in one at a time (ie they can do another if the one is appealed and stopped). Prosecutor doesn't have to be in jail while they wait, but their lives end simultaneously and under identical conditions.

[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Regardless of what this case is about, I think it's wrong to offer plea deals that negotiate the sentence below the death penalty.
Even if I'm 100% innocent, I'm gonna take the plea deal instead of risking my life in court.
If there are crimes so serious that they warrant the death penalty, there should be a trial. And if we're okay with letting this person live, why did we consider taking their life in the first place? It's a very coercive way to do "justice". Admit to the crime or else we might kill you.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think I would valueblife without parole over a death sentence

If your remaining life is going to be nothing but prison, why does it matter if it's a couple years or couple decades?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 23 points 23 hours ago

That an argument against plea deals in general. Prosecutors regularly throw more extreme charges into the mix to scare defendants into taking a plea. Whether the choice is death or life in prison or 10 vs 3 years, the underlying corruption of the defendant's decision making is still there.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago

Plea deals should only exist to implicate other perpetrators in a larger conspiracy.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Plea deals are disturbingly common, too. Like 90+% of serious crimes. Prosecutors seem scared to actually do their jobs.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because with the amount of people that get arrested, they know the entire system would grind to a halt if everyone actually had the means to take their case to court.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

All drugs should be legal and regulated.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 23 hours ago

It's not so much that they're scared.

It's more that they've found the "high conviction rate regardless of guilt and therefore easy reelection and campaign donations" cheat code.

And that they haven't been stopped from using it to pervert the "justice" system beyond any semblance of fairness or, well, justice.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How much you wanna bet he's getting some of that $1.776B terrorism fund after SCROTUS allows it

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So I guess this "man" must be white because political motivated murder is a shoe in for terrorism charges

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not that he's white, it's that he did it for the right team.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Whiteness didn't help Mangione dodge terrorism charges.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Weren't Italians and Irish considered "dirty whites" back when "America was Great"?

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 day ago

You MUST understand he's a GOOD Person who had a BAD day!

-People who want to Give Luigi the DEATH Penalty!

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago

Don’t do sloth dirty like that.