this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
657 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30114 readers
2754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s administration is threatening to withdraw federal funding for unemployment assistance in all 50 states as part of the president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

In a letter to the governors of 53 states and territories, acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling warned that the federal government would use “every available tool” to combat “waste, fraud and abuse” within state-run unemployment insurance programs, including “withholding administrative funds from states” for the first time in history.

There is no single national program for unemployment support, though the federal government partners with state agencies to support temporary financial assistance to out-of-work Americans. Nearly 2 million people are currently receiving those benefits, while roughly 229,000 people are filing initial jobless claims every week, according to the Labor Department.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And still the population will sit behind their screens with their keyboards and sgare a few memes and generally be pissed off and oh look its the next scandal and they population will sit behind their screens and generally be pissed off and oh look its the next scandal of the week...

[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Alexa what is a "distraction?"

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

He's gotta do something to pay Iran 300b.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

Projection much, huh?

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Also privilege, Republicans see themselves as privileged, it's not fraud when they do it, they are allowed, it's fraud when others without sufficient privilege do it.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Jokes on them, it's basically impossible to get unemployment here to start with.

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Where is here?

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

pls no, this would make the crime rate skyrocket

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's the idea. Make it so the poor have no choice but commit crimes and then lock them up for it

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's what the federal cabal wants.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What the fuck are they trying to do? Why would they wanna destabilize the country?

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Peter Thiel and a bunch of the other billionaires want to carve the US up into city states, they’re not particularly secretive about it either. The point is to destroy the country

It’s a quiet revolution most aren’t even aware is going on

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I look forward to the day people stop thinking it will end in 2028

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is there any literature on this?

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Project 2025.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 11 points 7 hours ago

Because in its an excuse to send in soldiers, try to justify martial law, suspend elections, and otherwise drag the country deeper into authoritarianism. It's not quite a dictatorship yet, after all.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

An actual traitor president and it looks like we're just gonna ride it out with our fingers crossed.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Does that equal an amount intended for ballrooms or Iran?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

Have to imagine this will disproportionately hurt red states and then they'll blame it on Obama or Biden or something. Really hoping some state will withhold federal taxes but I know our leaders are too spineless for that :[

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

If you take the top 10 states by unemployment rate, half of them are red states. Top 20, almost 3/4.

[–] Haze@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

California funds its own unemployment benefits, of course Trump is too stupid to know this.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

It says they will take funding from states that don't comply with their bullshit so I'm sure the red states will be fine

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Then, magically unemployment will go down and they'll call it a success. Even though all that's happened are fewer people qualifying for unemployment, and more than likely it will result in a net increase in unemployed people.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There's not really a mechanism for withholding federal taxes

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Sounds like something easy to fix, just don’t pay them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 39 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

What he wants:

  • desperate people who work for scraps
  • riots, so he can call in the military and call off the election

What he (hopefully) gets:

  • a revolution

Seriously, why aren't billionaire villas burning? Why is Mar-a-Lagos still standing? I'm surprised how much the American people are willing to endure.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Armed revolution results in U.S. military drone strikes on blue states. I am not joking. This is Pete Hegseth's handpicked military; they're waiting for a revolution to crush.

I'm not necessarily saying a revolution should or shouldn't happen, but you should absolutely be aware of the circumstances on topics like these. Plus, people have tried to attack the president. So many times that it's seemed for a while that these are selected shooters. They've all failed thus far.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Trump's war of choice in Iran was an unmitigated disaster. I can't imagine how poorly they would respond to domestic guerrilla warfare

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Horror. Abject horror would be the result.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

If it's like Iran, it looks like he'd try to fight this weaker force, lose anyways, and then push the cost on all Americans, which would just grow the insurgency. His incompetence extends to military strategy.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I’m surprised how much the American people are willing to endure.

At this point I'm convinced we're the weakest generation of Americans in American history. And the fact that our history really isn't very long doesn't help make that feel any better.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

IMHO it doesn't get any weaker and lower than exterminating indigenous people or owning slaves.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, just book a trip to Florida and burn down Mar-a-Lago. Why hadn't I thought of that before?

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you seen the French protest? I don't say one man should go to there and burn it down, but I would expect big, violent protests there.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The French only have to protest in France. Imagine the French protesting in Moscow. That's the distance from Utah to Florida. Utah isn't even the furthest point from Florida. Tell some Frenchmen to go march on Russia and protest until they get their way. Now picture that playing out.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Surely no one will gun you down within 200 yards.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

If they start shooting protesters things will escalate. That's how civil wars start.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 50 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

But by now, everyone either knows or refuses to acknowledge that the President is a notorious pedophile.

A sudden spike in unemployment followed by waves of debt default, foreclosure, and police actions on the unemployed would seem to be the more pressing issue.

This just feels like the Iran "Today's bombing a girl's school distracts from who the President was fucking in 1997" Epstein War bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Hahaha, do it. I'll get the pop corn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 33 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"Lets do something fast and stupid so they stop talking about me starting and losing a war."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 32 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

the "fraud" starts and ends at the oval office. investigate that s.o.b. first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Check me if I’m wrong but the only thing he can cut is the administration funding. The actual benefits are funded by a type of insurance companies pay into. Trump can’t take that away.
All this will do is make processing claims a bitch.

He’s such a dick.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 12 points 13 hours ago

I dunno if you've noticed, but he can do anything he wants because there's no opposition.

load more comments
view more: next ›