this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
1293 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40520 readers
4848 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

As someone who is an expert in one area and as dependent as anyone else in others, and who also hates appeals to authority -

To me, the correct stance is that any should be able to question things that don't make intuitive sense or that one suspects might be a perspective motivated by financial considerations instead of expertise.

Note that I said question. Not invent your own replacement fever-dream explanation.

Questions require good-faith attempts to find information and understand.

Not pitch something where its main virtue is that it makes ignorance feel good actually.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

There's a reason peer reviewed studies are so important.

It's literally other people with knowledge on the subject questioning the results of a study until everyone agrees to the conclusion.

It's not just one person pulling something out of their ass and saying "Look! This thing!" and everyone just going along with it. It's questioned and proven multiple times.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I just want people to trust. Being skeptical and wanting to learn is perfectly fine, but also, people do go to school for these things for years, you know? Have a little a faith they aren't lying to you.

By "you" I just mean people generally, of course.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 2 hours ago

You're both spot on. We live in a deliberately low trust society with grief merchants heckling experts for the sole intention of division.

I don't know how we can get back to a high trust society, but it did exist once, and I think the first step to it is education and the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine in the media

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I dont mind if people stream but sometimes the exaggerated thumbnails with their stupid exaggerated expressions is so fucking weird. Like it smells like LOOK AT ME.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 31 minutes ago

Use the "dearrow" browser expansion. It's a game changer

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

they basically started the whole pseudoscience movements, a couple of fake diseases: morgellans, Chronic lyme was all coined by midwestern moms having psychosomatic, delusional parasitosis events. i went to other forums, and the symptoms they described are not of infectious diseases, by some mental illness they describing.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Good luck making the pigs stop eating slop

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

We need to start tellingmtjmem to close their mouths because we dont want to smell the shot in them whenever the pigs start talking.

Maybe we shouldn't perpetuate dunning-krugerization such that everyone feels they fully understand the effects of a magnetosphere on orbital mechanics after a one paragraph explanation. The sense of 'ownership' and 'mastery' people seem to have of a field after ~~ingesting~~ licking like two facts is really disappointing.

[–] uberfreeza@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Based on what I see in this thread, I find more of an issue to be media. Mainstream media can walk the line of truth and falsehood and make people think a certain way. Anyone who sees that can be redirected to an online source, which can be anybody from Jane/John Infantbrain to legitimate scientists. Being an influencer doesn't preclude being a specialist, academic, etc., but the average person isn't going to determine or care for the difference.

[–] VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world -5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

You say this, but I got banned from a sub for being a corporate shill for trying to explain to what I'm pretty sure was a 13 year old kid that AI is not going to dissapear and that it's not just a fun toy used to make shitty TikTok videos

I would explain what AI Agents were and how they worked and what they did and I was told I was a troll that like to suck my bosses dick... and then I was banned

My job? Software engineer. Been one for over 20 years.

Those same people that called me a troll, a shill, a company man that liked to suck my bosses dick; the mods that banned me; they are all probably here right now talking about how stupid it is that people don't listen to experts...

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're a 1 week old account, and all you've done is shill AI non stop (with arguments that are wrong and uninformed).

I think that supposed 13 year old is smarter than you, and I also think the mod was probably in the right.

Oh, also. AI as in LLMs and agents is not the future. The fact that you're a software engineer means nothing, you either are a bot or drank the kool aid. And after seeing you say lies such as "AI is already not a failure" or that is has done new things "more than any other invention in human history", I don't know if I should believe that you are a software engineer.

[–] VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is what I'm talking about...

Deep Learning had a major breakthrough around 2012 with ImageNet. What we know today is already 14 years old. It wasn't as good as it is today, or as accessible 14 years ago, but it was around. And people really think the world is just going to decide to forget we invented it any day now

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 minutes ago

Oh my God shuuut uuuup, we don't care!

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Idiocracy has become a documentary.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago

Idiocracy had leaders who were actually wanting to make things better and hired the smartest people they could.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 30 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Masters degree in AI here.

Every day I feel like medical specialist during highest anti-vax craze. No matter what I say, no matter what kinda research and articles I cite social media and advertising simply scream louder and more often.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Same. AI/ML background long pre-dating GPT; trying to navigate my career is sending me to an early grave from the number of charlatans and rich idiots flooding every part of the industry, talking complete nonsense, and getting an army of devoted fans who make shit memes dissing "luddites".

I can't participate in any AI-related forums any more because of the sheer number of twats pontificating about nature of sentience, who think "backpropagating" is something you'd find at a swingers' party.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah AI-related forums are absolutely apeshit. Online discourse is pretty much either "AGI is here, use AI for everything, no questions asked, no criticism accepted" or "AI is the coming of anti-christ, end to humanity and even looking at AI products should be punishable by death".

No in-between online.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 29 points 17 hours ago

Maybe if the people in control of AI weren't quite literally the most evil people currently on the planet, more people would understand. Also the fact that they're all trying to cram it into every aspect of our lives, despite it being a demonstrable failure doesn't help.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Says someone on alt right pedo platform Twitter. He's not wrong, but come on. The irony.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 22 points 21 hours ago

With a blue check. Which means they paid the pedo techno fascist.

load more comments
view more: next ›