this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
104 points (99.1% liked)

News

38143 readers
1870 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Obviously there'll be a bunch of title-only readlers making quips...

Police urged people to “strictly avoid” the area around the airport in Tomblaine to allow emergency responders and law enforcement unrestricted access to the crash site.

Sounds like it didn't make it far off the ground.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, most crashes, especially bad crashes, happen during takeoff and landing. Once you're actually up, the engine is likely to continue running fine, and even if it doesn't, you have sufficient altitude and airspeed to glide to a reasonable landing.

[–] Lupus108@sh.itjust.works 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Worst aviation disaster in history happened on the ground. Tenerife Airport disaster

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Your own source says it's the 3rd worst.

[–] Lupus108@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

The disaster is the third deadliest aircraft incident in aviation history (after American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175), and is the deadliest accident in aviation history.[1][2][3][c]

The other two are the planes that hit the world trade center on 9/11. I always understood disaster to be describing more of an accident, but obviously it can also describe a terror attack where someone intentionally crashes an airplane, fair enough.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 0 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Small plane pilots are usually trained to maintain minimum altitudes to allow for that exact scenario. Airliners can fly with just one engine, that single engine Cessna can't do the same when it's only engine stops working.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The minimum altitude is actually part of even the amateur pilot license rules: at least 500 feet at all times except during takeoff and landing, plus single-engine planes are suppose to, when above an inhabited area, be high enough to be able to glide out of it before reaching the ground (which is why, for example, in cities you see helicopters following rivers and large avenues).

Further, something like a Cessna 150 is pretty light and designed to go slow (cruise speed is something like 90 knots - so a bit over 100km/h) and thus has a low stall speed and can glide quite well (remember that the air drag force is proportional to the square of speed, so a plane whose stall speed is low doesn't need to trade as much potential energy - i.e. height - to offset the loss of speed from drag and stay above that stall speed).

It's the stuff designed to go really fast - like jet fighters - that pretty much can't glide because aerodynamic designs that optimizes for speed (and agility) actually reduce lift (and thus increase stall speed).

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A Cessna, or pretty much any light aviation plane, can glide quite well.

Most airliners can too, provided the RAT is working. See "Miracle on the Hudson"

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Most airliners can too, provided the RAT is working. See “Miracle on the Hudson”

Also the flaps.

The stall speed is much higher if flaps can't at all deploy.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

Well they experienced gravity in a different way. Rest in peace.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Sufficiently kitted to bail out if they’d just had sufficient warning I presume. Sad.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It was near a runway, so they were probably just taking off (if they were landing I'd assume they wouldn't have the divers on-board). So even with the kit they wouldn't have had enough altitude

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That’s a good point about not being onboard for landing. Either way, I don’t mean to make light at all.