this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
173 points (97.3% liked)

News

38215 readers
2084 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So now communities just have to pursue net-negative emissions goals?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Let me know when we can start trading pollution futures. Ideally I can make money by dumping chemicals into a specific reflecting pool.

Nvm, that's just "prediction" markets. Fuck me. I try to make a joke about how ridiculous this reality is by being even more absurd - and it's already a reality. This is why satire is dead.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Making it illegal to be efficient. Perfect example of why the US is too dumb to continue to exist.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

Namely the Republican party. Their opponents have problems too but let's be honest here, things would start looking a lot better.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is simply a fuck you to the rest of the world. “We care so little about climate change that we’re going to intentionally make it worse”

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

"Making it worse sells more fossil fuels. I get kickbacks for that."

[–] modernangel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

if all the icecaps and glaciers melt, which they currently are, Florida is going the way of Atlantis. Never mind making liberal heads explode or throwing marginalized outgroup profiles in prison for fun and profit; you'd think sheer simple self-preservation would mean something.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The mouth breathers either don't believe in global warming, or don't care because they figure they'll be dead by the time the bill comes due. Basically the classic conservative take of "fuck you, I got mine".

or don’t care because they figure they’ll be dead by the time the bill comes due

I don't get people who think like that. Don't they have kids, grandkids? They might not have to suffer the consequences, but their descendants do.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

According to Ben Shapiro they can just sell their houses.

https://youtu.be/X9FGRkqUdf8

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

but atlantis can survive underwater, and can fly to another galaxy. florida is going to become a seafloor soon, if not the various invasive species taking over florida. Plus the MOUSE is whats keeping florida upfloat, both directly and indirectly.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand the purpose of so many restrictive policies. Very overbearing to have a government like that

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

That's the purpose: to be overbearing.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

Florida loves banning things. I don't know how Floridians can handle so much Freedom

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Heh, malicious compliance time: time for net-negative emissions goals 🤪

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

NetInfinitesimal.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Florida-stupid

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Why? What the hell is the problem if they want to?

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Makes no fucking sense. Also this lame ass "government" shouldn't be even allowed to dictate this shit to businesses.

All I can think of is coal lobbyists paying for this shit to happen. Fuck you all; wish you the worst.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

gas/oil lobbyist, adding the largest gas station on earth is funding these governments.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

But where can there be coal in Floriduh?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

HB 1217 also prevents local governments from purchasing items such as vehicles or appliances based on the fuels they use

Technically this allows for malicious compliance "actually we wanted to buy a gas powered engine but the law didn't allow us to specify the fuel"

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I mean... EVs don't use fuel?

All in all, wtf is even the point of this? You have to assume some fuel people gave him money.

[–] Loce@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I mean... Sooner or later cat 5 will struck again, they don't seem to give a shit...

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

From the bill:

"Net zero policy" means any policy, program, or initiative designed to achieve a balance between total amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere with an equal amount removed from the atmosphere.

It really is the exact sort of dumb you can weasel out of. "Our program seeks to be carbon negative" is not net-zero, nor is just setting one of the intermediate goal points as the goal (e.g., instead of net-zero by 2050, 50% reduction by 2035). There are some specific restrictions about cap and trade policies and taxes based on carbon content though, so it's not just the net-zero restriction.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's gotta be some kinda German word for what Florida represents.

horrifyinglyembarrassingexcrementeken.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago

Actually, the word is Italian: Fascista

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don’t know one that sums up Florida, but I know one that sums up how I feel about Florida: Fremdschämen.

Edit: Actually, I guess we could just add Höllenloch to it and get what you were trying to say: Fremdschämenshöllenloch or Vicariously embarrassing hell hole. I’m sure someone whose German is much, much better than mine will breeze through here and correct me.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Net zero? Ok, just pursue negative emissions

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Lol Florida

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I need Temu Trump removed from power asp.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Just waiting patiently for Florida to sink into the sea.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

America and their governments get dumber by the minute. It is amazing how much stupidity one can cast into a law, being blinded by ideology (or better, idiocity).

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago

desantis, you never had a chance at the presidency, never will. stop trying.