this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
100 points (94.6% liked)

politics

30253 readers
2853 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Internal National Park Service documents seen by The Washington Post suggest visitors should “avoid prolonged exposure” in unhealthy areas

July 4 fireworks in Washington, D.C. may cause hazardous levels of pollution around the National Mall, according to a report. ​

More than 850,000 pyrotechnic effects are set to be launched from areas surrounding the Mall, West Potomac Park and the Potomac River throughout the display, Freedom 250 says, to mark 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.​

However, internal National Park Service documents obtained by The Washington Post suggest particles from firework combustion could create “very unhealthy” conditions in central D.C this weekend.​

The health warning is another potential blow to Trump’s planned celebrations, following the appearance of algae-blooms and peeling paint in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The commander-in-chief was also reportedly “livid” at the crowd size at his kick off event for the Great American State Fair.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Perfect time to include some gun shots.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Well this is true to some extent about all fireworks shows. So it's mostly just a "how bad is it" kind of judgement.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, July 4th is the bane of asthmatics, PTSD sufferers, and pet owners and has been since fireworks displays have been a thing. I’m totally here to shit on Trump, but let’s also shit on every city that does it as well. ‘It’s an important tradition to raise the AQI to 200+ and spray heavy metals everywhere’ only holds water for so long, and it’s not only bad when Trump does it.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

17,000 pyrotechnics per minute, for nearly an hour.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That does seem rather like a lot.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 12 hours ago

Over 100x the rate of fire at the Battle of the Somme

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 7 points 13 hours ago

I hope that pool catches on fire

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Not surprised, he's the kind of guy who blows his paycheck on several automatic boxes of fireworks and lights them all at once. "It's going to be huge!" but you can't see much and it's over after a couple of minutes.

... and sets them all off before it gets dark.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 13 hours ago

And the last ones set off cause a fire.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Would be a damn shame if a group Group of freedom folks used the sound of fireworks to cover gunfire and explosions.

A god damn shame

[–] Solitaire20X6@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

also expected to cause hazardous pollution: you-know-who