this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
61 points (96.9% liked)

science

27925 readers
998 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrBanjo@reddthat.com 38 points 3 days ago (6 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Brighter for less energy is the important bit. It doesn't mean that the lowest brightness has to be higher than it is now.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

But marketers must have number go up! Moar Candles!

Seriously, more efficiency is always good, but does anyone actually test monitors for low brightness performance, how good is the color at 100 nits, 50 nits, 10 nits, how low can they go? It's like reviewers have totally forgotten that dark rooms exist.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, bright sunlight is the worst case for contemporary displays, so you usually don't have that. And you don't want to stare in a lamp for most of the time.

I usually have to help with xrandr --brightness and --gamma, even in daylight, because the darn thing is still too bright on it's lowest setting. What's important for me is therefore contrast, not brightness.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'm more concerned with outdoor signs and billboards at night. There's one near me that's so ridiculously bright that it's hard to drive by there at night.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Could be useful if you want to watch TV outside in the sun 😂

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlFVPnGEb8o

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

you jest but doing work on a monitor outside even with non reflective screen is tough.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Seriously, I already have to put my monitors on nearly the lowest brightness as it is. So tired of extreme bright lighting. Especially offices.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, my finger can only fiddle the brightness toggle so much. Any more and I’m going to be playing Operation with the slider widget.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

bright as the sun you say.

begging for meaningful action regarding how bright outdoor led displays can be at night. Forbskme of them its like they bottled the sun

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like it could be really useful for VR displays. The best optics for VR right now use polarizers to fold the optical path repeatedly through the same lens, but a side effect is that only a small portion of the light makes it to the users' eyes.

Could also extend the battery life of phones; the display is the main power draw for most phones, and the higher brightness make that worse.

I understand why people are reacting badly to these being described as "brighter," but it does also mean "more energy efficient for the same brightness."

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I understand why people are reacting badly to these being described as "brighter," but it does also mean "more energy efficient for the same brightness."

Exactly, it's all relative. What "brighter" really means in this context is more energy converted to light, less energy wasted to heat - which is entirely a good thing.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Fuck all. Of all the problems they could fix, brighter displays is not one of them.

These LED signs light up the night sky. No stars, affects wildlife, hope you don't live across from one, all caused by these blights.

These should be banned.

Darkskies are a right.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

This thread is full of people completely missing the point. How in the world is an improvement to display technology so it uses less power a bad thing?

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Sounds like we should do more of this "discovery" then

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

How about text I can read without a lupe?