this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
95 points (91.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49588 readers
621 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To me everyone should be. Think it's kind of selfish to let viable organs go to waste when people are in need for them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucky_Acid@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In my experience, some of the people that I have met that aren't organ donors are afraid that the hospitals and doctors will do less to save you if you're in an accident so that they can use all of your organs to "save" many more people. It's dumb, but I've met a scary amount of folks who believe that.

[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not entirely unjustified.

A Push for More Organ Transplants Is Putting Donors at Risk

People across the United States have endured rushed or premature attempts to remove their organs. Some were gasping, crying or showing other signs of life ...

A surgeon made an incision in her chest and sawed through her breastbone.

That’s when the doctors discovered her heart was beating. She appeared to be breathing. They were slicing into Ms. Hawkins while she was alive.

[–] YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Why do they paywall all the fun stuff behind being dead

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 month ago

I consent to this

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That part doesn't matter one single shit to me. So what? I'd be dead. It doesn't matter what happens to my body when I'm dead.

For that matter, why should anyone give a shit? Society has this really illogical view on corpses. We place way too much reverence on empty husks of meat. They are dead. Dead. The person who was there is gone. Their body is not them.

And if the person had some dying wish to be buried or cremated or anything like that, you don't have to honor it. That's the thing about respecting the wishes of dead people; they are dead, their opinion matters as much as the opinion of a brick. You don't honor their memory by spending thousands of dollars to put an empty husk of meat pumped full of chemicals into a gaudy box and bury it in the ground next to hundreds of other boxes filled with empty meat husks. You honor their memory by remembering them. That's it.

Have a funeral. Have a remembrance party. Mourn them with stories, with tears, and with an abundance of drink and unhealthy comfort food. The body does not need to be a part of it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

On the other hand, they would have let her die if she was not a donor.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's crazy to see validated conspiracy right there out the NYT. As it reads, seems these procurement companies need to stop influencing doctors.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago

I don't want to provide any profit incentive for my death. Same reason life insurance makes me uncomfortable as well. It's not rational.

[–] finley@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In some US states, it’s opt out when you get ID or drivers license. I think that’s a better way to go about it

[–] this_jury_is_hung@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I very much agree. Also, in a lot of places, that indicator on your license is not legally binding, the decision still comes down to your next of kin.

A system where everyone is a donor by default, but can opt out in a low-effort manner such as sending off a signed declaration, would still allow those with a genuine desire not to be donors the ability to do so, but would greatly increase the donor pool by capturing the majority of indifferent people who simply have not made the effort to opt in.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Opt out is fair at a minimum. Driving is the most dangerous thing we do, and if you’re going to do it, there’s an argument to be made that throwing your organ donor chip into the pot is the least you could do, because you could very well cause an accident someday that costs someone their life.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but as someone who does not drive, I still get a state ID with my organ donor status. If the law is opt-out, it would apply for anyone getting an ID, not just drivers.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If driving is the reason to make it opt out, I don’t see why that couldn’t be changed for state ID.

Though really I don’t see a problem with it being opt out for all. Many places do it that way.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

I know someone who works in the organ donation industry, and that's what's made me question wanting to be an organ donor more than anything. The dilemma for me boils down to 1. You need to not be dead dead for your organs to be harvested 2. We are not really that good at determining what's good enough dead vs definitely alive but seems dead when time is critical, doctors are busy, and there's people actively pressuring for the transplant to happen.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I think few people would object to it if they were told it was an option, but the default is "no" in most countries and many people just don't think to opt in.

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

I don’t even have an organ. Hell I don’t even know how to play one!

[–] comador@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Some people such as myself can neither be blood nor organ donors because their bodies are undesirable.

Examples: Cancer, Leukemia, HIV, TB, Leiden V Factor, etc.

People with such issues are often incompatible donors.

[–] Waldelfe@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Also severe allergies. I've been told I couldn't be an organ donor due to anaphylaxis. You can donate blood with heterozygous Leiden V factor though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

My only problem with organ donation in the US is the recipient gets a huge bill, including $86,000 for the actual liver. The donors family gets nothing.

So if someone gets into an accident and eventually dies, and is a donor, the family gets a massive bill, and the hospital makes $1M from the recipient.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you sit down and give the topic all due fair consideration, yes, there’s only one rational conclusion. However a lot of people just don’t want to think about dying, period, and will switch off on anything that makes them do so. I’m sure there are also misinformed people who think their organs can be freely stolen even if they’re not dead yet if they check that box.

I’m not justifying these people, mind you. I’m just describing how it happens. There is no good reason, but there are reasons.

[–] somebody_to_love@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

People are being a bit cynical in the comments, so I’ll share my experience which is a bit different.

I felt an irrational fear when I checked the box to become an organ donor a few years ago.

I rationally knew it was the right thing to do, but it felt bad nonetheless. Nowadays I just no longer think about it.

So my guess is that many people are scared of it, but no one wants to admit that.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

My dad was an organ donor when his brain died. The next day after the 24 hour period to confirm brain death, I was sitting with my brother and stepmother waiting to have the plug pulled when a lady walked into the room and introduced herself "as part of my father's care team." I don't remember much of what she said because I was focused on waiting for the end and she wasn't wearing scrubs so I didn't really care what she had to say, but she left and after another couple hours I learned that she was from the Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) for our State, my dad was a donor, and they weren't pulling the plug until they took him to a different hospital for organ harvesting.

The rest of that day was a blur but my stepmom was pissed, the next morning my dad's body was in the same room, that lady was apparently fired, there was a new guy and gal as well as their boss to talk with us, they told us they weren't going away. Eventually they agreed to perform the harvesting surgery there so we could walk to the OR with him. We were asked if we wanted a "hero walk" where the nurses and doctors take time away from actually helping people to clap for a corpse being walked down the hall, which was the dumbest fucking thing I'd ever heard of.

I wasn't there when my dad's brain died in the middle of the night. I thought I'd be there as his body functions shut down over the course of a half hour, but instead the last I saw of him before he was cremated was his still breathing corpse being pushed down a hallway. I got a text that his heart had stopped a couple hours later.

Across North Dakota, Minnesota, and Wisconsin there are only something like 350 organ donations a year because the body needs to be either very fresh and preserved or brain dead to keep the organs intact for harvesting. If you are a donor, it is very unlikely that your organs will actually be donated, but if they are, it can add a whole extra layer of shitty to an already awful situation for the family. Obviously this is just my experience and it's probably unusual for people to be fired so it was probably an especially bad one, but you asked and this is my answer to your question. I'm still not sure if I'm going to be a donor next time I renew my license. I don't think I will until I add a stipulation to my will to allow my family to override it if they feel a need to.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I am an organ donor myself but there are a few different reasons people are not

  1. superstition and religious beliefs. Some religions are against it.

  2. a belief that doctors won't try as hard to save them if they can use their organs to save more people

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
  1. Opposite of 2, you’ll be in pain longer because they want to keep your organs alive.
[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mine is reason 2. Ideally yes, the system is set up to not allow for that, but I think we all know that corrupt people tend to find ways around "foolproof" systems.

Mind you, my organs probably aren't worth a darn anyway, but again, some people won't care about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

I know some people fear that they could end up in the hospital with something not life-threatening but the doctors would harvest their organs and kill them.

It's not a rational fear, but people do be thinking that sometimes.

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've got a family member who has heard tell of folks having their organs harvested while still alive, and that's enough for them to say no. Helps them sleep at night, so fair enough. Your peace of mind has value.

Also I think maybe the catholics are against it? It would fit their whole schtik. Can't day I care enough about what they think to find out though.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

While it is the right thing to do, it's the final fuck you from hospital corporations as you still get billed for everything before death, and they bill the recipient >$1M. Organ donation is big money.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There are religions that forbid it. A lot of people just don’t care either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I'm a donor (woe betide whoever gets anything from me) but I totally understand not being OK with it. This guy says we won't need them, but that's unknowable. Maybe there's a bunch of donors at the gate not being let in until the rest of them gets there. But if ever you have a right to claim ownership over anything, it's your body. Your organs aren't collective property others have a right to. You fuck off, these are my organs is a totally reasonable position.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 1 month ago

Conspiracy theories and actual corruption.

People are afraid doctors will kill them to get the organs. Doctors don't want to deal with those accusations so will not take organs without clear consent from family. Some places are actually opt-out, doctors have enough legal protection and public trust is high enough that doctors will take organs without waiting for consent from family. In other places...

I remember some case from Poland where as a part of corruption case doctor was accused of killing a patient to harvest his organs. The patient was allegedly in a coma and the doctor disconnected him from life support to get the organs. This was clearly a witch hunt, all the other doctors got scared and transplantations in the entire country went down as a result.

So in many places people simply don't trust the doctors and will not give consent. There's also a lot of superstition and religious thinking involved.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I mean.....some organs you do not want. Like my colon. You do NOT want my colon.

Logic says my liver SHOULD be dead by now, but somehow I've had no issues. Sooooooo, maybe give it to an alcoholic? Apperently booze has no impact on my liver. How it survived my 20s, I'll never know.

And my brain??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh, sorry. I was just imagining what it would be like if a silverback gorilla decided it wanted to tickle you. Because what are you gonna do? Get tickled by a gorilla, that's what! Oh, also, my brain is weird. Probably don't want anyone being given that.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Does anyone remember the time the US military blew up a Grandma?

I don't give a fuck. Take 'em when I go, if you want. I doubt they'll be any good, but recycling's 'in' these days, so ...

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It wasn't that long ago that doctors had to go grave robbing at night, risking their careers and freedom, just to be able to get access to the human cadavers needed to advance medical science. Christianity has always had a real problem with people adding or removing things from the human body, even dead bodies, and the effects of that are still echoing all around the western world in many many ways.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

As a person who nearly died waiting on a new set of lungs the answers in here are absolutely wild and disappointing for the most part

[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To me everyone should be

Have you ever pondered about the logical implications of this way of thinking?

Have you ever pondered about who has the "easiest" access to organs? It's gazillionaires like Bryan Johnson who dream of "immortality" (Death Herself entered the chat: "LOL"). Needless to say, a humble human being like us in need for an organ is very unlikely to afford it than a gazillionaire does, you probably know it.

So imagine if there were some kind of law requiring everybody's organs to be donated: who do you think would benefit from such a law?

Furthermore, this kind of law would inevitably become a fundamentum for a new law in the lines "every person should give birth yearly" so gazillionaires could get plenty of organs to choose from a broader "genetic pool" (sic). And, suddenly, world would become a dystopian, Matrix-like human farm, harvesteable by a few "powerful", a world where biological human existence got reduced, through the force of the corporations-states joint venture, to being born, raised and indoctrinated by the capitalist system for the legally-enforced purposes of working and reproducing yearly, until, say, the wannabe-god Jeff Bezos in his 300th anniversary demands another liver from the "peasantry" because he took too much whiskey during his last weekend's trip to his Blue Origins LEO Stargate Resort and he needs so badly to be alive next week so he can order another round of "mandated peasantry breeding & layoff programme" at Amazon.

Don't get me wrong: I'm not against organ donation, much to the contrary; I'm well aware there are humans in need for organs and, given I don't really care (or at least I want not to care) about the fate of this biological garment I've been compelled to wear, I'd happily give mine away (if my organs were still functional despite my unhealthy habits)... except, of course, to gazillionaires; unfortunately, I wouldn't be physically around to refuse a rich my organs, best I could do as a disembodied dæmonic entity would be haunting to hell their mansions and resorts.

!nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It should be opt out, not opt in.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Chronical illnesses. For different reasons, both my wife and I are "unfit" both for organ and blood donations.

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I had hep c. Can't be a donar.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You think it's kind of selfish because you're a rational person. The reasons people aren't organ donors are because the thought of surgery makes them squeamish ignoring the fact that you'll be dead and won't feel it, and the other reason is because they think they need to take the organs with them to heaven. It's mostly religious nuts.

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am registered as an organ donor. Recent events and body/organ mismanaging lead me to like to be removed from that pool.

Examples : Someone mom was shoot over in a catapult style to test the strength of a military device, no body was able to be recovered for burial. Not only organs as one think can be used will be harvested, skin and other parts will too. Is all comoditized and the main winners are hospitals and body brokers.yes that's a thing, look it up. I want my family to have closure when that happens not vein part of weird experiments, if I find a way to just hace like the basic organs removed then do the other ceremonies would be much easier to agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›