this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
162 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30411 readers
2782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago

That's roughly $250 per American citizen. Why aren't we all getting refund checks?

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And will the companies be sending some refunds to their customers?

Lol. No.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m still boycotting most US companies.

Costco gets a pass though. They sell Canadian veggies and food, and they generally treat customers well and have good return policies.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Plus their $5 rotisserie chicken is the envy of the world.

Or at least the envy of this guy who lives hundreds of kilometers from the nearest Costco, over 1600 when avoiding Sweden 🤷🏻

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I buy two whenever I go. When I get home I break them down, we have two of the leg quarters for dinner, freeze the other two leg quarters for a future dinner, pull off and shred the white meat to freeze for various future uses, then the carcasses get thrown into the pressure cooker with some aromatics for homemade stock.

And a nice little eight piece wings for a chef snack.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

I am so happy for all these poor billionaire corporations. They are finally receiving the compensation they deserve for the massive financial strain of passing tariff fees onto consumers!

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The United States government has returned $81 billion to businesses….

…. that consumers paid for and now the business just made extra profit.

Pretty sure that was the plan all along.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why exactly does USA has a senate when president can just behave like a dictator anyway and do whatever he pleases to further his grifting bullshit?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The whole Trump presidency showed that Congress is not working as the check on the executive it was meant to be. The US won't survive for much longer if they don't enact reforms after Trump is gone. I also have a feeling Trump is just gonna pardon everyone on his death bed (or at least his family) and no one is going to face any consequences for everything they did.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Pardoning only works if someone is found guilty. You cant preemptively pardon someone to basically give them immunity like the president. In theory anyway...

Edit: im wrong

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

I thought that changed after watergate for some reason. Guess i was thinking about the part where the acts have to have already happened

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it’s not working because the current congress doesn’t want to act as a check.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Nothing is working because no one in a position of power wants to act as a check. This is working because everyone with the ability to actually do anything, loves this. This isn't a Congress problem or a courts problem. This is a problem with enforcement.

He has broken 10,000 laws all across the board from child rape to money laundering and racketeering to actual laws governing the president and nation, but everyone in an enforcement arm of government supports white supremacy and patriarchy and they think this is the only way for them to stay on top of brown and black skinned people, women, and queer people.

This isn't a trump problem. He's just the head of the pimple. America is full of pus. It must be drained and dealt with or another head will form right after the first. Everyone with a government gun wants this to happen. Everyone with a government gun will continue to push this just like they did before trump, and they will "elect" another.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Pardoning shouldn't have any relevance or validity if it was done by a crooked idiot like Donald.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

None of us will be getting a dollar of that money back, and we paid for it. All of it. This is an $81b windfall to corporations.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You paid for it twice: once with your own money when you bought things and the companies passed the tariff costs on to you, and once with your taxes when they refunded the tariffs to the companies.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Again. This isn't the first time corporations got "justice" or "help", at our cost.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

*holds wallet open in vain*

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kudos to the photographer who took the pic right as drumpf had that ridiculousslook on his face.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, it must be hard catching him looking odd, due to the excellent hair and make up.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

And they spent it all so now they have to print money to hand it back.