this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
434 points (96.2% liked)

News

23266 readers
3204 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“This was not reckless driving. This was murder,” the judge said before she read out Mackenzie Shirilla's verdict Monday afternoon.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 273 points 1 year ago (35 children)

The reason why they say this was murder:

Two weeks before the crash, she allegedly threatened to crash her vehicle when she was driving with Russo because she was upset over a disagreement they had. Russo called his mother and asked to be picked up, and a friend ended up retrieving him. In a phone call with Russo, the friend allegedly overheard Shirilla say, “I will crash this car right now,” prosecutors said in court documents.

This isn't a drunk driver, or a thrillseeker, this is someone with murderous intent.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago

Considering she was unconscious as well, sounds like it was a murder/suicide attempt.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Fucking hell that is horrible. And of course she's the only one to survive. 100mph into a brick building has probably left her pretty physically fucked up and in constant pain. Hope she enjoys feeling that way in prison for the rest of her life.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kyden@l.cackl.io 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am truly sorry for the passengers. Lost life because of teenage perceived hardship is tragic.

From a different perspective, it seems incredibly impressive that anyone survived a deliberate head on collision with a brick wall (that appears to have barely buckled) at 100 MPH / 161 KMH.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks for the Christianization of the speed units, God bless you

Survived and still standing on her feet...

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not just survived, but with everything intact. No missing limbs or massive head trauma. She's wildly lucky in that reguard.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ineedaunion@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago

More of this. Also let's start holding rich people accountable of crimes also.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Remind me why we allow teenagers to drive 3-ton vehicles again?

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

"Gotta get them teens to work. And no public transit options please, they make my money pile smaller."

-CEO's everywhere

[–] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Why do we allow most people to drive 3 ton vehicles

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Because the vast majority of them don't use the 3ton vehicle to commit murder.

You do know that adults use vehicles as murder weapons also, yeah?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _wintermute@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The same reason we all have a personal 3 ton vehicle: to ensure we remain bound to a culture of sprawling roads and fossil fuel consumption.

[–] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 10 points 1 year ago

When I think back to how immature and reckless I was as a teenager I can't believe I was legally allowed to drive and considered a full grown adult at the age of 18.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Prosecutor: What gear were you in at the moment of impact?

Defendant: Gucci sweats and Reebok Classics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kite@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a lot of people in this post spouting their opinion on an article they very clearly did not read.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The mum of one of the dead put it well - justice was served but nobody won today.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nyanix@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Jesus, I sympathize, this is awful...i was t-boned by a teen going 85 mph, I wish my attorneys had the same teeth this judge does

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Saturdaycat@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wow the way she's crying is disgusting, she's just sorry for herself not for the deaths she caused. No remorse, only regret for getting sentenced

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Wow the way she’s crying is disgusting, she’s just sorry for herself not for the deaths she caused. No remorse, only regret for getting sentenced

How do you know that? I don’t know about you but I’ve done things in anger that I felt genuine remorse for later.

Never killed anyone though, I suppose.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyone with a legal background able to help me understand how two deaths resulted in 4 murder convictions and 2 vehicular homicide convictions?

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can say she was convicted of two counts of both R.C. 2903.02(A) & (B)—basically "normal" murder and felony murder. Clearly they thought she did it on purpose and because she was committing another felony. I can't say why those don't merge together under Ohio law or if they are supposed to. Ohio is a fairly statutory state, so maybe they overwrite that common law rule?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Buffalox @MicroWave

Often the driver does survive catastrophic accidents vs front passengers.

https://emj.bmj.com/content/21/2/197

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Thank you, but that's a lot of reading for a simple question.

Statistical analysis was by χ2 test; a p value of less than 0.05 was assumed to correlate with a significant difference in rates of injury.

Oh yes it's all clear to me now.

I know it used to be like that before air bags and safety belts, because the steering wheel takes some of the blow in frontal collisions. But such dramatic difference I suspected she might have made the collision worse for the passengers on purpose.

PS She is probably a narcissist: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html

PPS: The article I found describes that her survival was miraculous, and she had surgery.

[–] Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yes it's all clear to me now.

The p value is effectively the % chance something happened by coincidence, and not because of a real effect. Like flipping a coin and getting the same side several times in a row. P value is an assessment of that likelihood. Less than .05 means a less than 5% chance of that. I don't know what the other bit is, except it was likely a method of statistical analysis.

It's a way of saying that the results they found were very unlikely to be due to chance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›