this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
702 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86697 readers
3625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I like how these only became a problem because Meta made them which meant a bunch of morons bought it.

Hidden and pinhole cameras have been a commercially available thing for decades, even on glasses.

Hell they even made one as a kids toy you could buy.

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 hours ago

Well, morons bought it and the device is directly connected to a data harvesting company. I think that has more to do with it. One lone weirdo with a hidden camera and a home server isn't the same kind of boogeyman

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 20 points 5 hours ago

San Diego ComiCon banned them, and Dragoncon is going to ban them.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 6 hours ago

PervSpecs®

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 41 points 8 hours ago

conference organizers said they have imposed a ban on “Meta-style glasses with recording capabilities.”

Dammit. I was hoping they explicitly called them "pervert glasses" like the headline suggested.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 26 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

So have shirt that says, "If you can read this, you may be recorded for your safety and for quality assurance purposes." That's what corporations do, right? Should solve the concerns?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago

That would make an awesome shirt, actually. Reminds me of the protest shirts on policy affecting RSA encryption, “this shirt is a WMD” or something to that effect…

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Nah. See the specific phrasing allows for you to record them and them to record you in two party consent states

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 99 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

All hidden cameras should be illegal, I don’t care about your “hands free convenience”

This is like anti pervert laws 101

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. If you want to record everything going on from your POV, strap a GoPro to your head and see if people's moods change about it. If they clearly don't want that, they don't want the "convenient" hidden cameras either. Simple as that.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

They don't want people knowing they are being recorded.

A gopro or a phone held up is basically an indicator of recording happening, which people can choose to avoid if they want to.

But pervert glasses don't hold up that signal, and the pathetic attempt to make a signal (the LED) is easily covered or otherwise bypassed so you can creep on people without them ever knowing.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 182 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

Honestly, they should not ban them, and then just low-key encourage enterprising attendees to pwn the devices and any attached accounts. That would be delightful.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 6 hours ago

It's maraudering time

[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 46 points 13 hours ago

This is the way tbh

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WhosMansIsThis@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I prefer the term 'pedofocals'

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Glasdhole still tracks, regardless of brand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 154 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Defcon is not the place I’d want to wear something like that and make myself a target. Of course, I’d be embarrassed to wear them anywhere, but afraid at Defcon.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I was afraid walking into the room with the wall of sheeple just bc I was wearing a button down in spite of being the sole sponsor of the hackathon. I (as instructed) left my watch, phone, laptop etc at hotel and only brought locked down Chromebook and lived in sweaty terror every keystroke. All while they were stoked and loving the sponsor not just buying a logo, and sent me back with like 500 bucks in swag easily to share back home at the office. Still.... Terror.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Fortunately most of the attendees are genuinely good folks, so generally what really happens is just that some data gets scraped and everybody has a bit of a laugh at one of the talks.

I know worse happens, I just think it’s worth mentioning it is actually a group of mostly awesome people.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 79 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

Shit, I’d be scared to go anywhere near defcon with any device.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 32 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I'd go in with an abacus and a notepad.

[–] gex@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Suddenly your abacus explodes after 65,535 beads suddenly appear.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 29 points 8 hours ago

“Hey, where’d all my beads go?!”

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 31 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
  1. Go to Def Con
  2. Wear internet connected camera in bathroom and while typing all passwords
  3. ???
  4. Profit
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 47 points 13 hours ago (20 children)

Like, I guess I don’t understand why these damn things have a camera in the first place. At most they should be roughly equivalent to a smart watch - a display and some controls. Maybe bone-conducting headphones or something for audio. It’d be neat to have navigation prompts in glasses, for instance. Buy why a fucking camera?!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (11 children)

Were it not for the fact that it's the fucking privacy-invading big tech companies doing it, I would admit that there are good use-cases for the camera:

  • Reminding you of the name and possibly previous interactions with the person you're talking to, for instance (if it only did local lookup based on consensual photos you had previously added to your address book). I'm not face-blind or anything, but my memory is bad enough that that would be helpful to me.
  • Scanning, OCR-ing and making searchable any papers you're looking at (hooking to your selfhosted Paperless-NGX).
  • Displaying augmented-reality translations of street signs (which is one of the few reasonable things Google Glass actually did).
[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I've heard they can be also quite useful for blind/vision-impaired users to describe surroundings and read signs, etc.

[–] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Even then I could see people not wanting picture, video, or audio recorded of them even if it is just kept locally for private use. And that's the problem of these glasses with trying to be discrete so people who would have avoided you or asked you to stop recording before having a conversation are left unaware.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›