this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
199 points (98.1% liked)

politics

30845 readers
2454 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

I mean he attacked Iran as a distraction from the Epstein Files coverup, soooooo it's not like he started off making rational policy choices.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

NK is big on money laundering and crypto scams. I wonder if some of that ended up in Trump's pocket.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 26 minutes ago

You can count on it

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Trump is everything chauvinists were afraid would happen if a woman was elected president.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also everything Republicans were afraid would happen if a commulist got elected

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 27 points 1 day ago

It's all projection. They have poor empathy and don't understand other people, so they just imagine themselves.

[–] subarctictundra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Underrated comment

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Has he ever made a rational policy choice?

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

No, he has only ever thrown temper tantrums when he doesn't get his way. His staff are the ones that try to turn each of those tantrums into actual policy choices.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What explains all the irrational policy decisions made before now?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing, it's just more lip service from the media while the world crumbles.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 0 points 1 day ago

The Atlantic really is shit

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Huh? He's going to punish South Korea for not joining his Iran war, by warming relations with North Korea, who are supplying Iran in the Iran war?

So he's pissing off both Taiwan and South Korea, while also trying to have a trade war with China, and also win the AI compute war. Good going.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

There's no point trying to discern any kind of strategy here.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When has he ever made rational ones?

[–] wicked@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

Didn't his net worth increase by something like 2.2 billion dollars as president? (..so_far.gif..)

Must be really good at predicting the markets, somehow. He's perhaps not that irrational when you consider his actual priorities (himself and his family), not whatever he is saying (MAGA).

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago

Does being blackmailed count?

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

His age, incompetence, his pettiness, his hubris and his inability to accept truth ALSO drive him to make stupid choices.

It was funny when he only hurt himself, but as president, it's a war crime.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not rage, it's very clearly dementia.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Dementia often induces rage.

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Hey South Korea, I would do yourselves a favor and hack the US + leak the Epstein files. Just saying.

[–] echo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

His narcissism, stupidity, and racism are making him make irrational policy choices. There is nothing new about this.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Driving him? That mother fucker left rational far behind, crashed the car, stole the ambulance and drove it off a fucking cliff

[–] BarnWolf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Everyday trump and his maga dogs dig the US deeper and deeper into isolation.

He was always known for such rational choices before though...

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

He does not need rage to make irrational choices.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Why would SK do that even if they wanted to, they have the DRK and China to worry about.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of all the irrational policy choices that Trump is making due to his illegal war, lowering the scale of military exercises with South Korea is pretty low on the list, especially as North Korea has been cashing in its weapons cache so Russia can continue fighting Ukraine.

I know that the South Korean military tends to need more training due to conscription, but I don't think that North Korea is choosing to be a major threat right now. You even have the South Korean President wishing to finalize a peace to the Korean War.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

FFS North Korea is supplying missiles to IRAN !

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Canada be like... welcome to the club!

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

We assume too often that his decisions are actually his.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Have any of his policy choices been rational?

[–] trainsrkool@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

just realizing this now?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago