this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41263 readers
1577 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: Old people often complain about young people not having "basic knowledge" and say that younger generations know and understand less of the world than they do.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StrassMav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago

It is a matter of expectations. A person who grew up in X situation believes that Y knowledge is fundamental, while one who grew up in Z situation may of had zero exposure to or need of being exposed to Y knowledge, instead learning T knowledge which they find to be fundamental.

There is a book I have actually, the Book of Basic Knowledge. I would say there is a baseline that makes sense for everyone to know for daily life(basic mental mathematics, how to construct sentences/formulate thoughts, a basic grasp of history to help understand why we are where and who we are, etc.), but some might believe there is "Basic Knowledge," that is outside the scope of that book, because of the logic I posited above. Or some might think that the book goes beyond Basic Knowledge. And some might just outright disagree with what I think is fundamental to interface with the world(though having lived in it long enough, I think what I put is pretty universally needed).

[–] Toasticus@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

It's yet another subjective thing because it varies from person to person. Basic Knowledge from Person 1 will say "common sense, simple math" and Person 2 will say "manners and developing respect". I mean, it's everywhere.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 2 points 1 day ago

Basic knowledge is similar to common knowledge and someone once said: "Common knowledge is not as common as you might think".

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's entirely subjective and one generation's "basic knowledge" may be someone else's "useless esoterica."

For instance, old people jerk themselves a lot about writing cursive and driving stickshift (and winning WW2 somehow???) but don't know how to put their phones on silent.

On the other hand, people are forgetting how to read and how to learn, and I'd say that's basic knowledge... so, case-by-case.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Checkmate, I can write cursive, drive manual all the time, and put my phone on silent 😉

I also can operate an 1890 Victrola.

Am I normal? No.

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All knowledge, even "basic" knowledge, is learned. No one was born with the ability to write cursive or operate a manual transmission. Manual transmission drivers can even spot a newbie on the road when they pop the clutch and stall out. We all learned these skills.

The real issue in modern society is that we aren't effectively teaching the newer generations these skills, whichever ones our society considers basic. Thats a problem far more complex than this post can really cover.

But I don't think it's too much to ask students to have way less screen time (no phones in school and less reliance on laptops/tablets for assignments and lessons.) I'd also go so far as to suggest schools do away with sports if they are unable to meet their academic mandates (school is for teaching academics, sports are a "pass-time" because they were activities we did with the free time we had. If you aren't accomplishing the goals of your institution your institution doesn't deserve the reward.)

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

I think part of it is that the concept of teaching yourself things or learning on your own seems to be vanishing.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Totally!!

My take: the inability for a human to be bored today has killed the love of learning. Bored? Open the Tok and scroll. In ye olden far before times (even before Ye Family Computer of Yore) you were bored as a kid and used your brain to find activities.

When I was a kid and even now, when I'm bored I look around me and do a project or fix something or learn how to do something ive been wanting. I just want to learn all the time. I feel thats really rare now.

I'd agree on zero screens in school,or at minimum, Linux only laptops. Zero tablet bullshit.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Millennial?

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Fair argument. Just wanted to point out that cursive has actual academic benefits. For one thing writing and drawing use both halves of the brain and since cursive is a form of drawing it engages both sides better than writing alone would. The information has a better chance of being retained that way.

Taking notes by hand also improves the odds of the information being retained with the added benefit of having a hardcopy to look back on if you forget. Like a grocery list. Taking notes is labor intensive so cursive was developed as a way to quickly write. Thats the whole point of it.

Luckily some schools are bringing back paper and pencil and teaching cursive because of the unmitigated disaster digital-only schooling has proven itself to be.

Edit Added some of the documented benefits of cursive handwriting since so many people are calling me out. Yes, cursive is good for you. Practice it, take time and improve the letters you write sloppily and you'll learn to love it. I know, I was once like you and had to work to improve my cursive and now I love it.

Cursive writing helps improve brain development, memory retention, and fine motor skills.

Brain and Cognitive Growth

Stronger neural connections: Writing in cursive engages both sides of the brain, unlike typing or standard print.

Better memory: The continuous motion of linking letters helps students remember words and grasp new concepts.

Aids learning challenges: The fluid style helps students who deal with dyslexia or dysgraphia by treating each word as a single connected unit.

Motor Skills and Writing Ease

Finer hand control: Shaping connected letters builds hand-eye coordination and finger dexterity.

Less hand fatigue: Smooth, flowing lines reduce the stop-and-start stress common in regular print writing.

Fewer letter reversals: Connected motion stops young children from confusing similar letters like "b" and "d".

Practical Uses

Reading history: Knowing cursive allows people to read old family letters, journals, and major historical papers.

Personal signatures: It gives individuals a reliable way to sign official forms, checks, and legal documents.

[–] roundabout@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Generally yeah. That was one of the main selling points of cursive

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that cursive has demonstrated benefits, but writing by hand does improve learning, as does reading on paper.

Cursive has a weird cult following. As someone who likes the idea of cursive, it took quite a bit of effort to give up on it. It's only theoretically faster, and it does so at the expense of legibility. I can't read my own writing at speed, and I can´t read Charles Darwin's either.

I started taking up Gregg shorthand to solve this problem. Faster and more legible, even without abbreviations.

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cursive writing helps improve brain development, memory retention, and fine motor skills.

Brain and Cognitive Growth

Stronger neural connections: Writing in cursive engages both sides of the brain, unlike typing or standard print.

Better memory: The continuous motion of linking letters helps students remember words and grasp new concepts.

Aids learning challenges: The fluid style helps students who deal with dyslexia or dysgraphia by treating each word as a single connected unit.

Motor Skills and Writing Ease

Finer hand control: Shaping connected letters builds hand-eye coordination and finger dexterity.

Less hand fatigue: Smooth, flowing lines reduce the stop-and-start stress common in regular print writing.

Fewer letter reversals: Connected motion stops young children from confusing similar letters like "b" and "d".

Practical Uses

Reading history: Knowing cursive allows people to read old family letters, journals, and major historical papers.

Personal signatures: It gives individuals a reliable way to sign official forms, checks, and legal documents.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds plausible.

Basic knowledge is knowing when to cite your sources.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Dyspraxia gang say no to that

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The left/right brain thing has never had any scientific backing. We use both hemispheres of our brain for art and logic.

In addition, cursive is no more a form of drawing than block printing is. And it was historically used primarily to speed up writing and make quills last longer. It is often used in calligraphy, but that's not typically what boomers are ranting about (very few of them know the first thing about calligraphy).

Taking notes by hand does have documented benefits, but I'm not aware of any evidence that cursive is better than block printing (unless speed is a significant concern). And as a millenial who grew up reading and writing both, I can say with certainty that block printing is typically more legible and more consistent across penmanship.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

Did you read your link? It actually does talk about the two sides specializing. Have you ever seen the people who had the connected sliced? You would never say that if you had seen the videos. There is most certainly differences in how the left and right brain function.

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Its well studied and in fact has many benefits. You're just mad your cursive looked like shit and the teacher called you up to her desk in frustration as she tried to decipher an s from a r on your work.

Cursive writing helps improve brain development, memory retention, and fine motor skills.

Brain and Cognitive Growth

Stronger neural connections: Writing in cursive engages both sides of the brain, unlike typing or standard print.

Better memory: The continuous motion of linking letters helps students remember words and grasp new concepts.

Aids learning challenges: The fluid style helps students who deal with dyslexia or dysgraphia by treating each word as a single connected unit.

Motor Skills and Writing Ease

Finer hand control: Shaping connected letters builds hand-eye coordination and finger dexterity.

Less hand fatigue: Smooth, flowing lines reduce the stop-and-start stress common in regular print writing.

Fewer letter reversals: Connected motion stops young children from confusing similar letters like "b" and "d".

Practical Uses

Reading history: Knowing cursive allows people to read old family letters, journals, and major historical papers.

Personal signatures: It gives individuals a reliable way to sign official forms, checks, and legal documents.

[–] zout@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not wasting time sourcing a half dozen research papers on cursive handwriting. Sorry. Read up on the topic yourself instead of knee-jerk hating something you never practiced enough to get good at. Like I said, I was a shitty cursive writer in highschool and years later when I began practicing my cursive I got better and began enjoying it. It is useful. It's a great excuse to not use your phone (spybot) for everything like making a grocery list. These are just facts.

[–] zout@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a lot of assumptions about me in a few sentences! I briefly searched for sources myself, but couldn't find them. Since your comments here read like copy/pastes I guessed you had sources, but it seems it's more like a religion to you; no sources because they're just facts.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I looked and found a probably AI page that conflated every study that looked at "writing by hand" with "cursive." Honestly, the most stupid shit. Cursive is just a form of handwriting with a cult following.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

That's what I found, so it really is a religion.

phone (spybot)

That greatly depends on the phone and app used for note taking.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

to add, the "basic" part is subjective, like you said, and downplaying other knowledge the generation might have.

can't really say what a good diplomatic response for this should be. i usually just shrug and say "sorry" when complained with this.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

If you're polite about it, you're being more gracious than they are being. I think maybe something like, "Yes, I can see where that would be a very helpful skill to have." And maybe it would be a helpful skill to have, and even a further maybe would be that maybe it would even be worth learning!

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Who was responsible for teaching them?

[–] vrek@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it greatly depends on "basic knowledge" definition. I once worked with an new-ish engineer who couldn't put air in her car tires. She told me she tried, she went to an air pump but couldn't figure out anyway to attach the hose. I offered to take a look. Turns out she didn't know that you could remove the valve stem cap.

Another example was another person didn't know you had to file taxes, this is in usa. He knew taxes got taken out of his paycheck. He knew he paid sales tax. He didn't know you had to file taxes and you could either get a refund or a additional bill. Not saying he didn't know HOW he literally didn't know it was a thing.

These were both college grads in stem fields before Ai. That said I mostly place blame for these things on their parents for not showing these basic things.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At my job, I assemble display items (bicycles, BBQs, lawn mowers, log splitters, etc). Been doing this for 8 years. So far, two customers tried to assemble their BBQs but couldn't. Both claimed to be engineers. It's not that difficult if one reads the instructions.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know, I wouldn't consider bbq assembly "basic knowledge"

But reading and looking at the instructions is basic knowledge for an engineer.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their education levels don't matter here. These are examples of things your parents are expected to teach you.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

True, hence my final sentence. Also I would consider these "basic knowledge" which is what the question was asking about.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah. I really think there is only so much people can really keep up where they know it. Preppers pretty much teach themselves stuff that was common knowledge in the past. those older people lack all sorts of basic knowledge. It comes down to what you need to know. The most useful basic knowledge is just reading and reading comprehension and math helps a whole lot to up to a point. Enough to read how to books and such. good to have enough experience that it does not have to explain how every tool works. of course we have video instructions now so hard to say how much that is needed. Still math, reading, writing. They help a lot in general cognitive understanding. I highly recomend elementary logic.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 6 points 1 day ago

I think there’s merit to it — there’s just some stuff you need to know to be a successful person in the world. If you’re a couple generations removed from me, or from a culture that’s significantly different from mine, your corpus of “basic knowledge” will be significantly different from mine, and that’s okay.

[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It’s fine in specific institutional contexts, like academia or employment where training is provided. Basic knowledge would be what’s covered in a 101 class, apprenticeship, or orientation.

Out in the world? People will yell at you for not knowing something, and the something they know is wrong. Don’t bother with those people more than is required. You can’t even expect that everyone makes it out of high school with the same information.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Subjective and this hardly useful.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Basic knowledge at one point used to include car maintenance and cursive.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They think the things they learned as a child are still relevant today.

Sometimes they're right, most of the time they're not.

Like, some people are still super upset that cursive isn't taught in school, mostly because humans don't like being the last in a line of knowledge, because that means they didn't really need it.

For an extreme example, look at the pushback again cochlear implants from deaf communities, especially from people over 40. A significant amount want to prevent deaf children from being able to hear, just because it makes the deaf community smaller.

Even if people don't admit it, we all want our "tribe" to expand. And tribal lines are only racial lines when racial segregation is happening. Segregate all the dead kids into a "school for the deaf" and they're gonna get tribal and want to see that tribe continue to exist even if that means their tribe members are worse off personally.

It's basic human psychology, to tie it back up to your question.

Getting mad at later generations for not learning the same stuff, is just a small slice of that behavior.