this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
222 points (97.4% liked)

News

39093 readers
1418 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s unclear how such an action would help lower U.S. borrowing costs.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

WTF? If anything we should be raising them.

Also, any "jobs report" under this administration is extremely sus.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

Considering they fired the last person who objected to falsifying the report, I would say they're deliberately fabricated.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Well yeah, it's the smart thing to do and prevents runaway inflation, but it's unpopular because it takes money away so he's gonna push for the opposite

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Are threats what trump thinks negotiations are?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Literally yes. He wrote (correction, had someone write for him) a book about it

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago

I'm familiar with the book. I love books and I love reading. The two books I will never read are trump's book and hitler's book. I believe trump has only read one of them (or at least had someone explain it to him).

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

There have been lots of questions about tiny-d donnie's connections to the mob over the years.

If so, it would explain a lot about the way he goes about trying to make "deals" (lol).

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

We will be doing so much winning that you may get tired of all the winning! 🫲🍊🫱

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What…? Seriously, like… what the actual fuck…? Is he threatening to nuke the economy by executive-ordering a halt to international trade if the fed doesn’t do what he says, which is not only deeply idiotic, but also completely unrelated to how bond rates are set…? Is that what’s actually happening here???

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yes he is. Why are you surprised

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That's not how this works.

[–] core@leminal.space 21 points 1 day ago

It’s unclear how such an action would help lower U.S. borrowing costs.

Spoiler: it won't and everyone knows it. Pretending Trump is some secret genius when he clearly isn't just shows where the LA times loyalties lie.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The jobs report is fake. Why is everyone pretending it isn't?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s so beyond the pale too. I mean yeah, numbers have been fake for years now, dating back to before covid even.

But this gigantic estimate, then getting blown out by 3x?! Bruh.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

They were fake before? How? I'd argue that they need to use U-6 vs. U-3, but people have been saying that for years. Usually that data is something people could find for themselves, but most of the "liberal media" reports on U-3.

This administration has shown that no amount of corruption and scheming is beyond them, though, and tiny-d donnie values only loyalty to him, so now the numbers are suspicious.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is so much Russian talking point crap

Provide evidence or STFU

Saying the Fed has always been lying is just trolling to sow distrust.

We have enough already.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well not lying, but not what everyone thinks it is.

One person picks up a side job after getting hours cut at his work? That's a new job created, even if that person makes less than they used to.

A guy gets laid off but registers with a gig app to try to pick up some driving or delivery tasks with spotty income prospects? That person is not "unemployed".

You aren't recognized as looking for work despite having no job? You don't count as unemployed either.

The "underemployed" is probably better to get an idea.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

All true. But done consistently the trend will give you insights into how people are doing.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but situations evolve that change the meaning.

15 years ago, being an independent contractor was relatively rare and pretty deliberate. Now that's just being registered with Uber, Lyft, Doordash. So lots of people stop becoming "unemployed" and become "independent contractors" due to what is essentially a cultural shift. Being an "employed" independent contractor is trivial now, but says nothing about income prospects.

The side job scenario certainly isn't new, so your point is taken there, that number of jobs "created" always could have been either good or bad without context.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

All true

The reason that economists use GDP (probably switching back to GNP in the post Trump world) is because it is easily available and easily sniff tested.

A better measurement would be appreciated if made available

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you have to vote by mail this season take steps to ensure you can get your ballot and get it delivered.

Try to avoid the postal service altogether.

For example in WA state you can print your ballot at home and deliver it to a ballot drop box.

Other states have other mechanisms to get votes counted without having to go to a polling place.

DO NOT TRUST THE USPS.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reps are going to steal the election anyway. Make necessary peparations.

Nevertheless: Solid advice.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reps are going to steal the election

They are certainly going to try.

It's every citizens responsibility to do whatever you can to make it as difficult as possible for those attempts to succeed.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly, they can try, but you better believe we all need to fight this out at the ballot box like our lives depend upon it because if we don’t have this fight now the next fight is going to be way more terrible.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump issued his demands Friday in a lengthy social media post after a stronger-than-expected August jobs report, which could bolster the case for Fed officials to raise rates at their next policy meeting starting Sept. 15.

In his post, the president exhorted his hand-picked Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh, whom he called “great,” and board members to “get smart” and “BE PATRIOTS for a change.”

“LOWER THE RATE OR I’LL STOP TRADING WITH COUNTRIES WITH WHICH WE HAVE A DEFICIT,” Trump posted. “High interest rates put the U.S.A. at a very unfair disadvantage, and I won’t allow that to happen!”

Fucking what?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I’LL STOP TRADING WITH COUNTRIES WITH WHICH WE HAVE A DEFICIT

So glad we have so much "freedom" that we have donnie dictating how all of commerce works for the whole country. Meanwhile, the ghoulish cons keep acting like Teh SOSHULIIZZMS is coming for all of your freedoms!

Also, donnie the dumb dumb is one of those morons that gets triggered by hearing "trade deficit". 🙄

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well you see diesel gasoline is at a record high price, so you don't want people talking about that.

But who knows what this is actually a distraction from.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not everything is just a distraction. Trump has been talking about Tariffs, interest rates and invading Iran since the 90s. He even took out full page ads at one point in the paper regarding some or all of those topics.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I don't know about Iran, but he's been blathering about tariffs since the 80s.

https://www.wpbstv.org/tracing-trumps-aggressive-tariff-strategy-back-to-the-1980s-trumps-trade-war-frontline/

But yeah, not everything is a distraction (from his pedophilia or losing to Iran), this is having a completely incompetent washed-up never-was get to inflict his stupid long-held worldview on everyone.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

The voting changes, immagration and customs attending polling places, and monthslong disappearances of legislators

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol, this is wild even for trump BS. I'd call his bluff and let his supporters see the emperor has no clothes.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

Buddy, they like nude old men, ESPECIALLY around children.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

lol

“If you don’t shoot a hole in this boat I’ll blow it up”

Okay buddy

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where have I seen this move before? Oh, right

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

The Republicans more or less always hold a gun to the head of something normal people care about, but that cons don't really care all that much about. Most of the time I'm reminded more of Martin Sheen in the end of The Dead Zone when they do this.

This particular instance is wild even by conservative standards, because just about all they care about is unfettered capitalism. I'd like to see everyone call tiny-d donnie's bluff here and see what happens.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

that will give us zimbabwe levels of inflation. time to cash out your savings and buy wheelbarrows, thats the next red hot commodity to have.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do it you fucking pussy. Tired of being threatened with a good time.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Especially since it just feels like imperial collapse blue balls at this point. If he did this I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it collapsed the feds. Like remember how bad shit was during COVID? Now imagine that but worse since trade was at least moving then.

Unironically just cutting trade with basically everyone has a solid chance of triggering a bi-partisan succession crises.

I'm tired of waiting for economic collapse, just get it over with already

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“We are all domestic terrorists.”

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We are all domestic terrorists.

These dumbasses think it was really funny to try to appropriate that as some ironic label like they did with "deplorables". Except, it was the DHS that pointed the finger right at right wing extremism when it came to domestic terrorism as a threat. Also, Hillary was right to label a certain percentage of the right as deplorable in their views. I think polling shortly after that time proved it, too.

I think, deep down, these awful people know it, too.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cpac-banner-domestic-terrorists/

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah Hillary was technically correct, but she couldn’t have had worse political instincts in that moment.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Honestly, if the "liberal media" didn't make such a hullabaloo about a big nothing, essentially giving the extremely radical right wing an assist, it would have blown over as just merely being an accurate observation.

Instead, there is all the usual Murc's Law bullshit at play here: Democrats have to be pure as the driven snow and cannot even state the truth lest it hurt the tender feelings of right wing snowflakes; Republicans, who are expected to be awful, and just cannot help it, get a pass on things like bragging about sexually assaulting women and having it written off as "locker room talk".

Republicans are allowed to just about say and do anything and get praised as just being straight shooters that speak like everyday people. Heaven forbid a Democrat were to do the same thing...