this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
207 points (98.6% liked)

News

39093 readers
1418 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A step in the right direction....

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

"This is great news!"

Is what I said when this was news a week ago and extremely widely posted...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 47 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Um, why is age verification needed at all in any personal OS?

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

So they can data breach it with no reprocuaions.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A question for the ages...

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

A question about your ages.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Won't someone please think of the children?!

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Of whom we require photographs... for reasons.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Age verification is evil. We need to take this and run with it

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Operating system open source exemption, but not open source app exemption

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Ok, that’s it. Asahi project, I hope you get to the M4 chip soon, and I gotta figure out how to got Photoshop, illustrator and InDesign running on Linux. :/

It’s been real, macOS, but if you card me, I can only say “fuck you”

Edit: and for all of those kind souls who wish to offer me Adobe alternatives: as a professional who has to use these Adobe apps everyday: they are really is no alternative. But thank you very much for your effort.

However, anyway, if you can help me to get any Adobe cc apps running in Linux, I will be eternally grateful— grateful enough to reveal how I’ve been getting them for free for 35 years. (it’s stupidly, easy, so easy that I don’t want to publish it and expose my loophole)

But it is both super easy and super legal— I found an easy and reliable way to game the free trial system. and I have been using it for decades.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

ignore the entire ecosystem of "professionals" who don't use adobe. like maybe it's true with your clients or whatever that you have to use adobe, but it's not a function of you being more "professional" than other people, shove that.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I don’t have to ignore them. I can just make $300,000 less per year. But I’d really rather not. There are those who pay me, and those who don’t. after all, I have a job to do.

The decision is pretty simple and pretty binary. Either I use professional software and get paid accordingly, or I use the software of children and LOSE MY JOB AND NEVER GET ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL DESIGN JOB.

I can use Adobe software and make the big bux and work with professionals, or I can use children’s FOSS software and struggle to find work and get paid nothing. that’s just how it is.

Anyone who tells you differently is lying to you.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

software of children

children’s FOSS software

Just gonna blatantly disrespect all the incredibly hard-working and brilliant people who not only use, but also develop open source tools? On Lemmy? Lol

Dunno homie, you sure you want to run your Big Boy Pants(TM) solely-viable professional corpo-rental big-bux ware on a "children's" operating system? Careful, you might not get paid!

Sincerely glad you're making it under current conditions in the creative field though. That's great.

But also it's a small world. If your wealthy moneybags masters demand proprietary shit, that's fine. We gotta get our bread.

But don't go trashing everybody else or their hard work. That's not gonna earn you any good will here nor anywhere else.

Anyway, there seems to be progress being made in this direction: https://www.xda-developers.com/someone-finally-got-the-adobe-cc-installers-working-on-linux-with-wine/

Best of luck to you.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 19 minutes ago

lol that’s a lot of words for “I have no clue what I’m talking about“

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 4 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

There’s always some idiot who will argue. It’s always an idiot who’s never worked in the industry, and will never work in the industry.

You’re wrong.

And you’re gonna die wrong. And poor, without a job in the design world.

No matter how much you kick and scream and cry, you’re never gonna get a job unless you use Adobe products. Lie to yourself all you like, you’re just fucking wrong.

Nobody wants your kiddie software, and no one will ever pay you unless you use the big boy stuff

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if launching the photoshop installer in proton on steam would work

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Well… starting with the Creative Cloud installer would the place to start, I suppose….

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Is it the right direction if you'll be unable to visit websites without having OS age verification?

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 2 points 9 hours ago

That's why god made a VPN. Come in from outside the country and it bypasses it all.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Websites not worth visiting IMO

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 8 hours ago

It would kill Linux adoption, though.

Although I'm sure Ubuntu and Red Hat are already working on implementing it.