this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
191 points (99.0% liked)

News

39263 readers
2536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Parkinson told me that her son—who competently walked the security guard back to their house after politely explaining that he wasn’t allowed to get into cars with strangers—had become distraught upon learning that he had apparently done something very bad.

There it is. This should have ended it. A short discussion between the security guard and the mother, with the mother explaining that her son was fine should have been the end of this, and the security guard could rest easy if he saw the kid outside again.

I'm Gen X and you already know our stories--gone from dawn to dusk in the summer with a stop in for lunch. Why have we done a complete 180 on this? Why are parents so afraid of fucking everything, it seems?

[–] AfterlifeAdventures@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Its the Republicans and their fear mongering, almost every network tv has overflow of cop/crime shows. They think they're tough but whom is the real snowflakes in this country?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

This seems like a big part of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago

Parents are afraid someone will call the cops on the kid, and the cops will call the state, and now your kid could be taken away, or you (the parent) arrested.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And there weren't tracking devices in every pocket back then either.

[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While true, there was a network of mothers who called each other without our knowing about it

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's fair, I definitely remember a lot of "hey, your parents are looking for you," usually while I was already on my way home.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We made tracking easy. Why leave your kid out all day if they have a phone that you can call whenever to make sure they're safe? Why let them go out without knowing where they are if it's so convenient to just put a tracker on them and know where they are at all times?

As soon as we didn't have to trust our kids anymore, we stopped, and as soon as we stopped, we no longer trusted them with anything. That's the issue with convenience - we'll do anything so long as its easy and sounds useful, and we won't bother wondering what the repercussions of that might be.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Elder millennial, same here

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OK, but to be fair, we really really shouldn't have been drinking out of hoses

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I still do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The fact she was arrested is unbelievable.

Admittedly, I wouldn't let my 5 year old have that much leeway, but I don't know her kid or the neighborhood and he seemed pretty capable based solely on the article. I'd probably wait until they are eligible for numbered grades. I was walking solo to elementary school and I made it out ok, so I guess kindergarten might not be much different. I think 7-8 is much more reasonable, but each kid is different.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In a gated community, with private security patrolling. That's probably safer than just being in the backyard unsupervised next to the woods.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

That's fair, though I don't think the security was patrolling. I imagine it was just the gate guard or something, but like I said, it seems like it was something the kid could handle. My main issue is with the fact it was around a body of water where it's possible not a lot of other people were. Maybe he's an Olympic swimmer and would be fine, maybe he has the self restraint that all the Greek gods lacked, but all the sudden the wind carries a feather into the water and who knows from there. Again, I don't know the kid or the area. I don't think this was an appropriate response. I'm just saying for me personally, based on my experience with children in my life, I think 5 is a little young for that activity. I'd probably be fine with a longer walk to a friends house, to school, or to a park. I just don't love the idea of young kids unsupervised near water.

The TV show Old Enough with Japanese kids running errands has kids 2-5, so I'm not saying it can't be done, I just personally wouldn't love the idea.

Edited for clarity

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I walked home from kindergarten. It was like 10 blocks. There were a few turns. And there was never any problem because of course there wasn't.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (26 children)

Officials in the case decided to press charges against Parkinson, and last week she was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and placed on Virginia’s child-abuse-and-neglect registry, where she will remain for seven years.

I am all in favor of delinquency, but I don't understand what delinquent behavior she could possibly have contributed to in this case? Walking in public? Having an interest in waterfowl?

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Ok_imagination@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus who decides the age in which a kid can ride the subway or walk to a gated community pond by themselves?

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago

Age 26 and no sooner, gated neighborhoods just aren't safe /s

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why do so many in the US feel entitled to make decisions for others?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Wren@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

Thank you for your service.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago

Yet another sign of a diseased society. Whether the disease will be terminal remains to be seen.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Back in the day kids younger than this were mature enough to hold a job. Now they can't even walk by themselves.

But seriously, times have changed and society has completely different idea of what acceptable risk for a child is than 30 years ago. They will also prosecute you for letting your kids do things that go beyond the limits they established. Not for actually letting your kid get harmed but just for risking it which will always be subjective. Everyone is scared now (even though crime is going down) and you have to be too or they will treat like you're crazy. For me it's just another reason not to have kids.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

TBF a lot of them died. Humans can be bad at gauging danger. Pre telegraph a child dying is a freak accident and the people of the community would understand it as uncommon, but now that we can collect and transmit data to the extent that we are, we can see patterns about what is dangerous.

I still think there shouldn't be criminal liability for shit like "child walked into unfenced water".

[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When I was a kid I collected toads from a nearby pond and biked to elementary school by myself. I was fine and I know the kids in my area still do this and they're also fine. I don't think this mother did anything wrong.

I kind of sound like an old fart complaining about kids not playing outside by themselves anymore saying this but I'm only gen z. Which is funny cause my 80 year old grandmother says stuff like that, but then also says that this mother should have been arrested.
¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›