this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
366 points (98.4% liked)

politics

31081 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump concluded his Republican midterm convention on Thursday by leading the audience in a pledge ... to himself.

Trump asked the crowd to raise their right hands and begin: “I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States.”

The crowd dutifully repeated the line, calling Trump “the greatest president in the history of the United States.”

Trump added: “that loves us so much he can’t even breathe.”

The crowd again repeated the line, but then it got a little harder to follow.

“That I will go out with my family, my friends, I’ll do it anyway, I don’t care if I’m registered or not. I’m going to try and cheat like hell like they do,” he said. “There’s never been bigger cheaters, they don’t care. I am going to go out and I am going to get my friends, my family, and we are going to vote on November 3rd or we are going to vote before that.”

Unable to repeat all of that, the crowd cheered.

Trump realized he lost them and reset.

“Are you ready?” he asked. “Here’s the way you ― “

But he wasn’t ready himself as he got sidetracked by people in the audience. He tried once more to finish, with the crowd repeating after him, but left them behind as he went off on another tangent.

“So help me God,” he concluded.

The crowd repeated that part heartily.

“You know what happens if you don’t vote?” Trump asked. “You go to hell!”

So much blasphemy that he's telling his supporters they're going to hell!

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 4 minutes ago

It feels more like a concert than a political convention lmao

[–] starik@lemmy.today 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

The only thing I like about him is how he humiliates Evangelical Christians regularly. He doesn’t believe any of the shit they do, but he makes them feel like they are gaining cultural power, so they are devoted to him.

This instance is particularly funny. One of the few things he knows about their religion is that they are motivated by a fear of going to hell, so he’s just like “I’ll use that!” If you don’t vote, you go to Hell. So get out and vote, you dumb rubes.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/JHBRMyx_xHs?is=hItSVYU6rL2a_DSy

I can't even. How anyone could be this demented and still be a leader of even a youth sports team would be beyond me, let alone the President of the US.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Go to any backwards town and get 4 people to stand behind you smiling in an extremely tight shot and pretend you're loved by everyone.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He's shitting his pants. Also, he's fucking terrified of the midterms.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

Midterms? Too old for him.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

That's as close to a Nazi salute as he can get without even the American media catching on.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 133 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I think that headline missed the plot.

“That I will go out with my family, my friends, I’ll do it anyway, I don’t care if I’m registered or not. I’m going to try and cheat like hell like they do,

So there are going to be a lot of unregistered Republican voters casting ballots?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 17 hours ago

He also almost said exactly how to cheat and either realized he needed to shut up or the brain fog kicked in to save him

[–] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 101 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So he just authorized conservatives to openly cheat.

The projection is just...

I can't with these people.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 87 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Not authorised. INSTRUCTED.

Let me repeat that: the current sitting president of the US gave an instruction to his followers to ignore the rule of the law and cheat at the election.

Even more brazenly than on 6 Jan 2021, he's literally instructing his followers to dismantle the entire legal basis of the federal state.

Watch it, his next attempt will be to then discredit the midterms' results and claim they don't count so the already sitting representatives stay.

They're getting desperate to keep control, because they KNOW people are going to vote blue. Mamdani's example of successful leadership contrasts the disaster of the cabinet too sharply. People are starting to see through the constant communist scaremongering.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

Not authorised. INSTRUCTED.

It's far worse than that. He's trying to get them to take a vow, to make a personal promise -- literally "so help me god" -- so that those who promise will then believe they will be held accountable before "god" to fulfill.

He's literally trying to make this promise have religious consequences for failing to live up to it in the minds of those who took it.

People who think this is all imaginary have no idea how real it is for those heavily propagandized in this way, who have had their real faith hijacked by Christian nationalist propaganda. It's no joke. It's all VERY legal, tick the box, "You said this and now you're bound by it" with actual threat of hellfire attached at the end. Just like Trump did here. Most of us would laugh; MAGAs do not.

This exact dynamic is why Republicans are so terrified of James Talarico down in Texas: he's offering the MAGAs who have equated Christianity with MAGA Christian nationalism a real off ramp from Trump that allows them to keep their church, faith, and local community.

If you're in a rural area where all you know are the 500 people that live in your mostly MAGA town, and you can't afford to be ostracized or you'll literally have no community left, it's a big fucking deal.

This faux "Christianization" of politics is very real, and that's what he's trying to capitalize on by making the rubes take a "repeat after me, so help me god" kind of vow.

Fortunately, he fucked it up, so they all have plausible deniability if they want it. But that's why he was struggling so hard to get them back on track and to repeat the whole thing: he knew exactly what he was doing, and to what end.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Some right wing nutjob is going to end Talarico too. There is no way they're going to let him win.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 54 points 17 hours ago

So, a direct pledge to him as god-king-emperor in which he claims moral authority over their previous god, and that he has the old god's power of final judgement.

Sigh, I wish with all my heart this were actually binding. I can think of nothing better than these creatures getting an eternity in a pocket universe of trump's creation with him as the supreme power.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 87 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

What a fuccen time to be alive. Could really use a grassy knoll right about now.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Weve had one, yes, but what about 2nd grassy knoll?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Personally I'm not hyped about a President Vance, but it would certainly be cathartic to see him suffer and die. I really want to see him die in prison, we almost had that until they voted him back in while his trials were ongoing.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

As I've pointed out before, Trump dying probably spares us the worst of the MAGA heads, but where Trump wants to lead with charisma and a charged base, I feel like Vance is actually content with keeping power via use of arms. The guy is craven at the thought of having power.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 19 hours ago

I guess we better pledge to cheat like hell or something

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 18 points 17 hours ago

I trust him on this.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The 33% who are too stupid and too racist to care what he says. They just love pulling off his diaper and giving him a sloppy rim job.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Not sure if serious... (I've seen how you comment and post, lol)

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 14 points 18 hours ago

I was totally unprepared for this imagery. Viceral.

[–] boobookittyfrick@lemmy.zip 16 points 17 hours ago

Oh my fucking god I’d say this can’t be real but it defiantly is

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I'm grateful I accepted myself as a godless atheist long before this shit came up. If I was a Christian, a real Christian anyway, I'd be so fucking pissed off by this guy.

I mean, I'm pissed off by this guy anyway, but not in a divine way at least.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 points 51 minutes ago

a real Christian

I wish this myth would die. There are no real christians. There is no real christ. The concept of christ is, "an abusive god sacrificed himself to save us from the violence he'll inflict on us if we don't submit completely to his vague and contradictory commands, which include owning slaves and selling women to their rapists."

Accountability is impossible when we tolerate magical thinking. Innocent people are dying for it.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I almost hope I'm wrong and there is a god so this guy does suffer eternal damnation

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

I actually kind of envy those people because at least they believe that he will receive eternal punishment.

Instead he'll just rot in a fucking grave

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

I'm in the same boat, sort of. I was a true believer, but the words-in-red kind, not like this lot. Got all the way out just in time, and I could not be more relieved. I literally do not know how I'd still be functioning if I were still a believing Christian and this was somehow my own twisted circus-mirror faith being reflected back to me.

Knowing it's all a lie is a VAST relief.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago

Feels like an easy way for him to lose people is to try and get them to "repeat after me", like there is no way helps people think he's snart

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I would 100% go to hell if it meant I no longer had to listen to this orange Russian cum rag.

You make this deal with a demon. You immediately die and arrive in Hell. It's not so bad, you have to walk over flaming coals to get anywhere and the demons inserting fiery brands into every orifice are pretty unpleasant, but you've had worse. You begin to settle into your new life.

A few years pass in this fashion, until one day the demon knocks on the door of your abyssal torture cottage. You ask him why he has come. He says it's time for your eternal punishment to start, and he'd like to introduce you to your new roommate.

fin

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So now the question becomes if we KNOW by their own words they’re going to cheat, why allow them the chance? Why not just eliminate the possibility by eliminating their right to vote? If not, I guess we have to cheat then - we’ve seen what happens when we try to play fair and they don’t, and we can’t afford even a single step more in that direction as it would be the last.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Eliminate the right to vote? So you are saying beat them to the punch in establishing an autocracy? It may come to that, we are no where near that yet.

I support restoring the republic and safeguarding fair elections.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

I agree with everything you said except:

I support restoring the republic and safeguarding fair elections.

Because I support the Balkanization of U.S. Nothing good comes from the continued existence of the this country. Trump's rise to power isn't a fluke, it is merely the natural consequence of courting authoritarianism for the better part of a century.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Such an outcome would lead to a strong man consolidating power, but first would lead to warlords, oligarchs with their own bastions of power, security services left derelict after the collapse of government would turn to highway robbery, aforementioned warlordism, and organized crime.

Then you have what is left over of the military, and whomever consolidates that, is the new supreme leader.

We could talk all day about how it would play out under different scenarios, but the collapse of governments in the US would be a very very bad thing if we weren't organized to institute a better system. That system could even be broken up into several, countries.

Otherwise the new boss is at best the same as the old, and in all probability much worse, with a lot of pain and suffering before that happens. And when that strongman takes power as an autocrat, future autocrats only get worse.

Plato noticed every single republic follows the same formula from representative government through stages of oligarchic repression to "democracy," as defined by the ancient greeks up until like the 19th century when it became a positive buzzword rather than a strong man rallying the population to seize absolute power. Then the autocracy degrades in time through successive leaders and is overthrown and a republic re-instituted.

No republics have since broken with the formula even if they haven't run through the stages yet.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah, an uncontrolled collapse could be catastrophic. That's an argument for building decentralized institutions capable of surviving a federal crisis, not necessarily an argument for preserving the existing federal state indefinitely.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Because I support the Balkanization of U.S. Nothing good comes from the continued existence of the his country.

I recomend you look up the setting for the Shadowrun TTRPG. The federal government fracturing would result in megacorps taking control of various regions of the country very similar to the game, minus all the magic stuff

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, what I really support is the Balkanization of the U.S. PLUS the complete and utter collapse of capitalism as a system. But that gets into a lot more of a nuanced discussion than I was prepared for.

But that game sounds sick, though.